Predicting negative appendectomy by using demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION Acute appendicitis (AA) is still the most common acute surgical disease. While negative appendectomy (NA) is inevitable, one of the greatest challenges a surgeon faces when treating patients with a primary diagnosis of AA is to decrease NA without increasing the morbidity and mortality rates. This study was conducted to evaluate the frequency of symptoms, signs, laboratory data and the diagnostic values of these findings as regards avoiding NA in patients with a primary diagnosis of AA. METHODS In a cross-sectional study, 1197 patients with a primary diagnosis of AA who underwent open appendectomy in two general military hospitals with a primary diagnosis of AA were evaluated over a two-year period. Data were compared between the two groups; namely those with AA and the ones with NA. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, Kappa and odds ratio correlation coefficients and the logistic regression model. RESULTS The mean age was 24.1+/-0.25 years. There were 911 (76.1%) males. Rate of NA was 18.2%. The regression model revealed that being younger (<21 years old) (P=0.049), being female (P=0.001), having a lower percentage of polymorph nuclear (PMN) cells (P=0.024) and a lower heart rate (P=0.021) could be regarded as independent predictors of NA (P<0.001). CONCLUSION Obtained results indicate that female gender, low PMN percentage and pulse rate, and age below 21 years can provide important diagnostic information in addition to other diagnostic workups to prevent unnecessary laparotomies.

[1]  P. F. Jones,et al.  Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  C. McCabe,et al.  Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. , 1996, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  E. Ghersin,et al.  The Role of Selective Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Acute Appendicitis , 2002, The American surgeon.

[4]  E. Paulson,et al.  Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. T. Wilcox,et al.  Have the evaluation and treatment of acute appendicitis changed with new technology? , 1997, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[6]  R. Andersson,et al.  Meta‐analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  J. Borer,et al.  Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis: common features discovered in cases after litigation. , 1994, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  N. Tzanakis,et al.  A New Approach to Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[9]  P. Bagi,et al.  Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis , 1989, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[10]  D. Hale,et al.  Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[11]  L Graff,et al.  False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  R. McLeod,et al.  Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. , 2003, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[13]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Does this patient have appendicitis? , 1996, JAMA.

[14]  P. Thomas Maingot's Abdominal Operations , 1985 .

[15]  S. Eriksson,et al.  The diagnostic value of repetitive preoperative analyses of C-reactive protein and total leucocyte count in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[16]  Seymour I. Schwartz,et al.  Principles of Surgery , 1891, The Southern Medical Record.

[17]  M. Radford,et al.  Probability of appendicitis before and after observation. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  Trevor Smith Ethics in Medical Research: A Handbook of Good Practice , 1999 .

[19]  G. Dunnington,et al.  High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[20]  Stewart C. Wang PRINCIPLES OF SURGERY, 7th Edition , 1999 .

[21]  P. Nyström,et al.  Repeated Clinical and Laboratory Examinations in Patients with an Equivocal Diagnosis of Appendicitis , 2000, World Journal of Surgery.

[22]  Hubert John,et al.  Appendicitis diagnosis today: Clinical and ultrasonic deductions , 1993, World Journal of Surgery.

[23]  A. Sparnon,et al.  Active observation of children with possible appendicitis does not increase morbidity , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[24]  F. Lewis,et al.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. , 1975, Archives of surgery.

[25]  P. Nyström,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Disease History, Clinical Presentation, and Inflammatory Parameters of Appendicitis , 1999, World Journal of Surgery.