Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention

A sample of 524 car owners living in a metropolitan area of Sweden answered survey questions measuring intention to perform collective proenvironmental behavior, awareness of egoistic, social-altruistic, and biospheric environmental consequences, personal norm, and ascribed responsibility. A measure derived from the survey responses was used to classify individuals in prosocial vs. proself value orientations. A structural model was estimated positing that proenvironmental behavior intentions are causally related to personal norm that in turn is causally related to ascribed responsibility and awareness of the different types of environmental consequences. Prosocials differed from proselfs in that to them social-altruistic consequences were more and egoistic consequences less salient.

[1]  P. Stern Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. , 1992 .

[2]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects1 , 1995 .

[3]  S. Schwartz Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[4]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[5]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .

[7]  P. V. van Lange,et al.  On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give‐some dilemma , 1989 .

[8]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A Normative Decision Making Model of Altruism , 1981 .

[9]  Knowlton W. Johnson Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[10]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Altruism and helping behavior : social, personality, and developmental perspectives , 1981 .

[11]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[12]  S. Komorita,et al.  Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction , 1995 .

[13]  B. Thompson,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLE SIZE, ESTIMATION METHODS, AND MODEL SPECIFICATION ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FIT INDEXES , 1999 .

[14]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Moral Norms and Environmental Behavior: An Application of Schwartz's Norm-Activation Model to Yard Burning1 , 1978 .

[15]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[16]  Joseph R. Hopper,et al.  Recycling as Altruistic Behavior , 1991 .

[17]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[18]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[19]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Governing the commons , 1990 .

[20]  Introduction and Literature Review 1. Introduction and Literature Review , 2022 .

[21]  Accentuation under serial and non-serial conditions: Further evidence in favour of the relative concept , 1973 .

[22]  Kirsten L. Stoutemyer,et al.  Water Use as a Commons Dilemma , 1991 .

[23]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[24]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[25]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Recycling and Morality , 1996 .

[26]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation , 1988 .

[27]  Eliminating Racial,et al.  Introduction and Literature Review , 2003 .

[28]  Russell Blamey,et al.  The Activation of Environmental Norms , 1998 .

[29]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[30]  P. Schultz,et al.  VALUES AS PREDICTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES: EVIDENCE FOR CONSISTENCY ACROSS 14 COUNTRIES , 1999 .

[31]  Lawrence J. Axelrod,et al.  Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? , 1993 .

[32]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[33]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[34]  Darhl M. Pedersen,et al.  MODEL FOR TYPES OF PRIVACY BY PRIVACY FUNCTIONS , 1999 .

[35]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[36]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Research on motivation : a review of the eighties and early nineties , 1994 .

[37]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[38]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms , 1985 .

[39]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[40]  H. Staats,et al.  Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior1 , 1999 .

[41]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[42]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour , 1999 .

[43]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[44]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  T. Gärling,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS, MEASUREMENT METHODS, AND RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1999 .

[46]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[47]  Charles G. McClintock,et al.  Social values: Their definition, measurement and development. , 1978 .

[48]  T. Gärling,et al.  THE ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY IN RESOURCE DILEMMAS , 1995 .