Habitat selection by the pale-headed brush-finch (Atlapetes pallidiceps) in southern Ecuador: implications for conservation

The pale-headed brush-finch (Atlapetes pallidiceps) is threatened with extinction due to habitat loss, but very little is known about its ecological requirements. We used multiple logistic regression to study habitat selection of this species at landscape, territory, and nest site scales in order to make recommendations about effective management. Habitat selection by the sympatric stripe-headed brush-finch (Buarremon torquatus) was examined with the same methods in order to analyse interspecific resource partitioning and potential competition. The pale-headed brush-finch selected semi-open habitat types with intermediate scrub heights, and avoided forests. Nest sites depended on the presence of vines or bamboo. By contrast, the stripe-headed brush-finch chose dense habitat with low ground cover under tall vegetation and avoided semi-open habitat. The two species had overlapping territories but differed significantly in microhabitat use and the use of vegetation strata. We found no convincing evidence that the stripe-headed brush-finch displaces the pale-headed brush-finch from optimal habitat. The preservation of semi-open scrubland maintained by low-intensity grazing is suggested for future conservation of the pale-headed brush-finch.

[1]  M. Conroy,et al.  WOOD THRUSH MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE: EFFECTS OF FOREST MANAGEMENT FOR RED-COCKADED WOODPECKERS , 2002 .

[2]  L. Fahrig.  How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[3]  A. Fielding,et al.  Testing the Generality of Bird‐Habitat Models , 1995 .

[4]  William L. Baker,et al.  Evaluation of resource selection methods with different definitions of availability , 1998 .

[5]  J. Illera.  Habitat selection by the Canary Islands stonechat (Saxicola dacotiae) (Meade-Waldo, 1889) in Fuerteventura Island: a two-tier habitat approach with implications for its conservation , 2001 .

[6]  N. Collar,et al.  Threatened birds of the Americas , 1992 .

[7]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[8]  P. Cale,et al.  The influence of social behaviour, dispersal and landscape fragmentation on population structure in a sedentary bird , 2003 .

[9]  G. Luck.  The habitat requirements of the rufous treecreeper (Climacteris rufa). 1. Preferential habitat use demonstrated at multiple spatial scales , 2002 .

[10]  M. Morrison.  Influence of Sample Size and Sampling Design on Analysis of Avian Foraging Behavior , 1984 .

[11]  T. E. Martin.  ARE MICROHABITAT PREFERENCES OF COEXISTING SPECIES UNDER SELECTION AND ADAPTIVE , 1998 .

[12]  S. Robinson.  Threatened Birds of the Americas.N. J. Collar , L. P. Gonzaga , N. Krabbe , A. Madrono Nieto , L. G. Naranjo , T. A. Parker III , D. C. Wege , 1994 .

[13]  M. Cody.  Habitat Selection and Interspecific Territoriality among the Sylviid Warblers of England and Sweden , 1978 .

[14]  M. Morrison,et al.  Temporal Variation in Resource Use by Black-Throated Gray Warblers , 1999 .

[15]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis , 1992 .

[16]  R. Langston,et al.  Territory selection by the Dartford warbler (Sylvia undata) in Dorset, England: the role of vegetation type, habitat fragmentation and population size , 2001 .

[17]  T. E. Martin.  Fitness costs of resource overlap among coexisting bird species , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Zwischen Naturschutz und Theoretischer Ökologie : Modelle zur Habitateignung und räumlichen Populationsdynamik für Heuschrecken im Niedermoor , 2000 .

[19]  The effects of visibility bias on time-budget estimates of niche breadth and overlap , 1985 .

[20]  David L. Verbyla,et al.  Resampling methods for evaluating classification accuracy of wildlife habitat models , 1989 .

[21]  J. Roper,et al.  Nest Predation and Nest-Site Selection of a Western Population of the Hermit Thrush , 1988 .

[22]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[23]  P. Donald,et al.  Local extinction of British farmland birds and the prediction of further loss , 2000 .

[24]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[25]  T. E. Martin,et al.  Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  K. Burnham,et al.  Model selection: An integral part of inference , 1997 .

[27]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  The role of habitat in avian community composition: physiognomy or floristics? , 1985, Oecologia.

[28]  Robin J. Pakeman,et al.  Grazing of lowland heath in England: Management methods and their effects on healthland vegetation , 1997 .

[29]  Des B. A. Thompson,et al.  Predicting the spatial distribution of buzzard Buteo buteo nesting areas using a geographical information system and remote sensing , 1996 .

[30]  James F. Wittenberger,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales in Habitat Selection , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[31]  J. Rappole,et al.  Periodic Migration and Lowland Forest Refugia in a “Sedentary” Neotropical Bird, Wetmore’s Bush‐Tanager , 1997 .

[32]  G. Orians,et al.  Interspecific Territories of Birds , 1964 .

[33]  J. V. Remsen,et al.  Distribution patterns of Buarremon Brush-finches (Emberizinae) and interspecific competition in Andean birds , 1995 .

[34]  Jason Jones,et al.  Habitat Selection Studies in Avian Ecology: A Critical Review , 2001 .

[35]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Habitat Associations and Community Structure of Birds in Shrubsteppe Environments , 1981 .

[36]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reserves , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  J. Terborgh,et al.  The Role of Competition in the Distribution of Andean Birds , 1975 .

[38]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[39]  R. Paynter.  Biology and evolution of the avian genus Atlapetes (Emberizinae) , 1978 .

[40]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[41]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[42]  J. V. Remsen,et al.  Distribution patterns and zoogeography of Atlapetes Brush-finches (Emberizinae) of the Andes , 1995 .

[43]  J. Rice.  Ecological Relationships of Two Interspecifically Territorial Vireos , 1978 .

[44]  F. Cisneros,et al.  Zonificacion agroecologica del Austro Ecuatoriano , 1998 .

[45]  T. E. Martin,et al.  Avian Life History Evolution in Relation to Nest Sites, Nest Predation, and Food , 1995 .

[46]  N. Krabbe,et al.  Pale-headed Brush-finch Atlapetes pallidiceps is not extinct , 1999 .

[47]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[48]  Boris Schr.  Computer-intensive methods in the analysis of species-habitat relationships , 2003 .

[49]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Threatened Birds of the World , 2001 .

[50]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  R. Holmes,et al.  Tree species preferences of foraging insectivorous birds in a northern hardwoods forest , 1981, Oecologia.