Surface Resistance of Crop Canopies

Three analytic and two emperic methods are described to calculate the surface resistance rs of crops transpiring at a measured rate. The profile method is applicable when detailed temperature, humidity, and wind profiles are measured; for the residual method, measurements of surface temperature, wind, and humidity are enough; for the heat balance method, the calculation is based on the ratio of potential to actual evaporation. For rough estimates, an empiric equation of Monteith or a relation between leaf area and surface resistance can be used. In southern England and in California all three analytic methods agree closely. Hourly values of rs in California demonstrate the effect of water stress on an irrigated grass canopy by midday, whereas in England the rs of a barley crop is maintained constant for almost the whole day. From Aslyng's measurements of evaporation, the relation of rs to soil-water potential is calculated and used to show how relative rates of transpiration and photosynthesis may change in response to water stress. For an equatorial rain forest in Kenya, mean monthly rs varied systematically with soil moisture deficit, ranging between 0.3 and 1.1, sec cm−1.

[1]  G. Szeicz,et al.  Aerodynamic and surface factors in evaporation , 1969 .

[2]  C. T. Youngberg,et al.  Photosynthesis and transpiration of monterey pine seedlings as a function of soil water suction and soil temperature. , 1968, Plant physiology.

[3]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Evaporation from unsaturated surfaces: A generalized combination method , 1968 .

[4]  W. Ehrler,et al.  Leaf diffusion resistance, illuminance, and transpiration. , 1968, Plant physiology.

[5]  S. L. Rawlins,et al.  In Situ Measurement of Soil and Plant Leaf Water Potential1 , 1968 .

[6]  C. H. M. van Bavel,et al.  Water Loss from a Sorghum Field and Stomatal Control1 , 1968 .

[7]  C. H. M. van Bavel,et al.  Changes in canopy resistance to water loss from alfalfa induced by soil water depletion , 1967 .

[8]  J. Philip Plant Water Relations: Some Physical Aspects , 1966 .

[9]  John L. Monteith,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL OF STOMATAL RESISTANCE IN THE FIELD , 1965 .

[10]  R. Slatyer,et al.  An Apparatus for the Continuous and Simultaneous Measurement of Photosynthesis and Transpiration under Controlled Environmental Conditions , 1965 .

[11]  T. V. Crawford,et al.  Radiation and Energy Balance Changes During the Eclipse of 20 July 1963 , 1965 .

[12]  J. Monteith Light and crop production , 1965 .

[13]  F. Kenneth Hare,et al.  The Loss of Water to the Air , 1965 .

[14]  V. Mason,et al.  Studies on the quantitative incorporation of sulphate sulphur into methionine, cystine and taurine in the hen. , 1965 .

[15]  H. C. Aslyng Evaporation, Evapotranspiration and Water Balance Investigations at Copenhagen 1955–64 , 1965 .

[16]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[17]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  The influence of soil water on transpiration by plants , 1963 .

[18]  J. Monteith CHAPTER 7 – Gas Exchange in Plant Communities , 1963 .

[19]  R. H. Shaw,et al.  Availability of Soil Water to Plants as Affected by Soil Moisture Content and Meteorological Conditions1 , 1962 .

[20]  I. F. Long,et al.  Weather in wheat , 1961 .

[21]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Potential evapotranspiration estimates by the approximate energy balance method of Penman , 1960 .

[22]  I. F. Long,et al.  Weather in wheat : An essay in micro-meteorology , 1960 .

[23]  P. Gaastra,et al.  Photosynthesis of crop plants as influenced by light, carbon dioxide, temperature, and stomatal diffusion resistance , 1959 .

[24]  H. L. Penman Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.