Evolution of discharge and runner rotation speed along no-load curves of Francis turbines

In hydraulic turbines, no-load operation is among the most damaging conditions since unextracted swirl leads to the creation of highly energetic flow structures causing high pressure and strain fluctuations on the turbine components. To date, experimental and numerical studies typically focus on flow characteristics for a specific no-load condition of a specific turbine. However, for a given turbine, a unique no-load condition exists for every single guide vane opening, forming what is called a no-load curve. Few studies describe the evolution of engineering quantities such as discharge and speed along the no-load curve even if those quantities may highlight trends in no-load behavior that can be used to tailor numerical simulations according to specific flow conditions. This paper presents results from a project underway at Andritz Hydro Canada Inc., in collaboration with Université Laval, to analyze the extensive database of experimental no-load tests performed at model scale in order to identify the evolution of discharge and runner rotation speed following the guide vane opening.

[1]  B. Nennemann,et al.  Numerical study of the flow dynamics at no-load operation for a high head Francis turbine at model scale , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[2]  Chirag Trivedi,et al.  Compressible Large Eddy Simulation of a Francis Turbine During Speed-No-Load: Rotor Stator Interaction and Inception of a Vortical Flow , 2018, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power.

[3]  Guy Dumas,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Origins of Rotating Stall in a Propeller Turbine Runner Operating in No-Load Conditions , 2018, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[4]  S. Houde,et al.  A Hydrodynamic Study of a Propeller Turbine During a Transient Runaway Event Initiated at the Best Efficiency Point , 2018, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[5]  Zhongdong Qian,et al.  Evolutions of Pressure Fluctuations and Runner Loads During Runaway Processes of a Pump-Turbine , 2017 .

[6]  W Weber,et al.  Progress in load prediction for speed-no-load operation in Francis turbines , 2016 .

[7]  J. Morissette,et al.  Simulation of air admission in a propeller hydroturbine during transient events , 2016 .

[8]  J Nicolle,et al.  A look at Francis runner blades response during transients , 2016 .

[9]  Zhengwei Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of unsteady flows in a pump-turbine during start-up transient up to speed no-load condition in generating mode , 2016 .

[10]  Bernd Nennemann,et al.  Challenges in Dynamic Pressure and Stress Predictions at No-Load Operation in Hydraulic Turbines , 2014 .

[11]  J Nicolle,et al.  Transient CFD simulation of a Francis turbine startup , 2012 .

[12]  Peter Dörfler,et al.  Flow-Induced Pulsation and Vibration in Hydroelectric Machinery: Engineer’s Guidebook for Planning, Design and Troubleshooting , 2012 .

[13]  V. A. Skorospelov,et al.  3D numerical simulation of transient processes in hydraulic turbines , 2010 .

[14]  R. Bettocchi,et al.  Analyse expérimentale de l'écoulement dans la zone axiale des canaux adducteurs des turbines-Hélices , 1982 .

[15]  John J. Cassidy,et al.  Observations of unsteady flow arising after vortex breakdown , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  P. Côté Investigation of the self-excited vibrations in a Francis runner in transient conditions of load rejection , 2015 .

[17]  Martin Gagnon,et al.  Transient response and life assessment : Case studies on the load rejection of two hydroelectric turbines , 2013 .

[18]  A. Skoták,et al.  Vortices Rotating in the Vaneless Space of a Kaplan Turbine Operating under Off-Cam High Swirl Flow Conditions , 1996 .