Communication in the Digital Work Environment: Implications for Wellbeing at Work

This article examines digital communication in the workplace and its association with wellbeing at work. The analysis is based mainly on workshop discussions and is complemented with log data (N = 36). Content analysis was applied to the workshop discussions, while the log data were analyzed by quantifying frequencies. Six themes were found to affect wellbeing at work: the volume of digital communication, expectations of constant connectivity, the quality of the messages, adaptation of new tools, technical problems, and flexibility in communication. In relation to wellbeing at work, digital communication was mostly perceived as demanding. However, some of the factors perceived as demanding could also provide flexibility, which was seen as enhancing wellbeing by increasing autonomy and control. Social factors, such as work habits, practices, and conventions in the workplace, seem to play an important role in the manifestation and management of the digital communication-induced load at work.

[1]  Daantje Derks,et al.  New Ways of Working: Impact on Working Conditions, Work–Family Balance, and Well-Being , 2014 .

[2]  Jussi Okkonen,et al.  Developing measures for information ergonomics in knowledge work , 2016, Ergonomics.

[3]  Toon W. Taris,et al.  A Critical Review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for Improving Work and Health , 2014 .

[4]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Technostress: The Dark Side of Technologies , 2014 .

[5]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[6]  Paul Johns,et al.  Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace , 2014, CHI.

[7]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[8]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study , 2004 .

[9]  B. Somekh Action Research: a methodology for change and development , 2005 .

[10]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[11]  J. Wajcman,et al.  Constant Connectivity: Rethinking Interruptions at Work , 2011 .

[12]  Nerina L. Jimmieson,et al.  E-mail in the workplace : the role of stress appraisals and normative response pressure in the relationship between email stressors and employee strain , 2014 .

[13]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  E-mail characteristics, work performance and distress , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  M. Salanova,et al.  The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies. , 2013, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[15]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[16]  P. Hasle,et al.  Employees as Individually and Collectively Acting Subjects—Key Contributions from Nordic Working Life Research , 2013 .

[17]  Gloria Mark,et al.  "A pace not dictated by electrons": an empirical study of work without email , 2012, CHI.

[18]  Dan S. Chiaburu,et al.  Communication Technology: Pros and Cons of Constant Connection to Work , 2011 .

[19]  Alecia M. Santuzzi,et al.  Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. , 2015, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[20]  HimmaKenneth Einar The concept of information overload , 2007 .

[21]  C. Nygård,et al.  A New Approach to Measuring Work-Related Well-Being , 2011, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[22]  A. Day,et al.  Information and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being. , 2010 .

[23]  S ManoRita,et al.  E-mail characteristics, work performance and distress , 2010 .

[24]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Communication chains and multitasking , 2008, CHI.

[25]  Information and Communication Technology and Quality of Working Life: Backgrounds, Facts, and Figures , 2014 .

[26]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[27]  Markku Turunen,et al.  Assessing Information Ergonomics in Work by Logging and Heart Rate Variability , 2017, AHFE.

[28]  C. Cooper,et al.  Information and communication technology demands: outcomes and interventions , 2015 .