Personality and Persuasion : Need for Cognition Moderates the Persistence and Resistance of Attitude Changes

Hypotheses about the persistence and resistance of attitudes and beliefs formed by individuals scoring high or low in Need for Cognition (NC; Cacioppo & Petty, 1982) were derived from the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). In Study 1, both high-NC and low-NC individuals formed evaluatively similar attitudes toward an unfamiliar attitude object (a new product) after exposure to a persuasive message (an advertisement). The newly formed attitudes of high-NC individuals decayed less than the newly formed attitudes of low-NC individuals over a 2-day period. In Study 2, both high-NC and low-NC individuals were persuaded by an initial message that a food additive was unsafe. However, when immediately exposed to a second countermessage arguing that the product was safe, the initial experimentally created beliefs of high-NC individuals were shown to be more resistant to change than the experimentally created beliefs of low-NC individuals.

[1]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. , 1987 .

[2]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[3]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Width of the latitude of acceptance as a determinant of attitude change. , 1972 .

[4]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Michael Ross,et al.  Bolstering Attitudes by Autobiographical Recall , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[7]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[9]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[10]  G. Lassiter,et al.  Need for Cognition and the Perception of Ongoing Behavior , 1991 .

[11]  I. Janis Personality correlates of susceptibility to persuasion. , 1954, Journal of personality.

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[13]  C. Haugtvedt,et al.  Situational Product Relevance and Attitude Persistence , 1990 .

[14]  D. Mackie,et al.  On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[16]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[17]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[18]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[19]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[20]  Discovery of Reliable Attitude Change Persistence Resulting from a Transmitter Tuning Set , 1990 .

[21]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes , 1985 .

[22]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[23]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Personality and Persuasibility , 1982 .

[24]  Alan G. Sawyer The Effects of Repetition of Refutational and Supportive Advertising Appeals , 1973 .

[25]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[26]  I. Janis,et al.  Sex differences and personality factors related to persuasibility. , 1959 .

[27]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. , 1985 .

[28]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience With the Attitude Object , 2004 .

[29]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Recipient characteristics as determinants of responses to persuasion , 1981 .

[30]  R. Batra,et al.  The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness , 1990 .

[31]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[32]  H. Lefcourt,et al.  Recent developments in the study of locus of control. , 1972, Progress in experimental personality research.

[33]  R. Carlson What's social about social psychology? Where's the person in personality research? , 1984 .

[34]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[35]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[36]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[37]  Kenneth G. DeBono Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. , 1987 .

[38]  H. H. Johnson,et al.  Relationship between authoritarianism and attitude change as a function of source credibility and type of communication. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception. , 1992 .

[40]  I. Janis,et al.  Persuasibility and emotional disorder. , 1959 .

[41]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[42]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[43]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[44]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  A cognitive response analysis of the temporal persistence of attitude changes induced by persuasive communications , 1977 .