Effects of a commercial fermentation byproduct or urea on milk production, rumen metabolism, and omasal flow of nutrients in lactating dairy cattle.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a fermentation byproduct on rumen fermentation and microbial yield in high producing lactating dairy cattle. Eight ruminally cannulated multiparous Holstein cows averaging (mean ± standard deviation) 60 ± 10 d in milk and 637 ± 38 kg of body weight were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment sequences in a switchback design. Treatment diets contained (dry matter basis) 44% corn silage, 13% alfalfa silage, 12% ground corn, and 31% premix containing either a control mix of urea and wheat middlings (CON) or a commercial fermentation byproduct meal (Fermenten, Arm and Hammer Animal Nutrition, Princeton, NJ) at 3% diet inclusion rate (EXP). Diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and isocaloric, with similar levels of neutral detergent fiber and starch. The trial consisted of three 28-d experimental periods, where each period consisted of 21 d of diet adaptation and 7 d of data and sample collection. Omasal nutrient flows were determined using a triple-marker technique and double-labeled 15N15N-urea. The EXP diet provided 18 g/d more nonammonia N versus the CON diet, representing 3.0% of total N intake. Energy-corrected milk yield (41.7 and 43.1 kg/d for CON and EXP, respectively), milk fat, and protein yield and content did not differ between treatments. Total dry matter intake was similar between treatments (25.5 and 26.4 kg/d for CON and EXP, respectively). Ammonia N concentration and pool size in the rumen was greater in cows fed the EXP diet. No differences were observed in rumen or total-tract dry matter, organic matter, or neutral detergent fiber digestibility. Ruminal degradation of feed N was 15% lower in cows fed EXP diets, resulting in differences in omasal N flows. Results demonstrated the fermentation byproduct meal had a sparing effect on degradable feed protein, but did not increase microbial N flow from the rumen.

[1]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro , 2021, British Journal of Nutrition.

[2]  A. Foskolos,et al.  Rumen digestion kinetics, microbial yield, and omasal flows of nonmicrobial, bacterial, and protozoal amino acids in lactating dairy cattle fed fermentation by-products or urea as a soluble nitrogen source. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  D. Ross,et al.  Development of an in vitro method to determine rumen undigested aNDFom for use in feed evaluation. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  W. Burhans Updates to the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System Implications of Changes in Version 6 . 5-6 . 55 for Diet Formulation and Evaluation , 2018 .

[5]  M. V. Amburgh,et al.  Characterization of Non-Nutritive Factors of Feeds for Model Development , 2016 .

[6]  L. Chase,et al.  Updating the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System feed library and analyzing model sensitivity to feed inputs. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  A. Foskolos,et al.  The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  D. Ross,et al.  Urea-N recycling in lactating dairy cows fed diets with 2 different levels of dietary crude protein and starch with or without monensin. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Jorge Alberto Elizondo-Salazar,et al.  Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche. , 2014 .

[10]  G. Broderick,et al.  Quantifying ruminal nitrogen metabolism using the omasal sampling technique in cattle--a meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  G. Broderick,et al.  Quantifying ruminal digestion of organic matter and neutral detergent fiber using the omasal sampling technique in cattle--a meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  A. Hristov,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of dietary protein concentration and degradability on milk protein yield and milk N efficiency in dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  L. Guan,et al.  Effects of feeding Fermenten on ruminal fermentation in lactating Holstein cows fed two dietary sugar concentrations. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  G. Holtrop,et al.  Distribution of 15N in amino acids during 15N-leucine infusion: impact on the estimation of endogenous flows in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  M. E. Van Amburgh,et al.  Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle , 2008 .

[16]  Richard A. Anderson,et al.  development in vitro , 2008 .

[17]  L. Chase,et al.  Updates to the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System v6.1 and implications for ration formulation , 2008 .

[18]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effects of different protein supplements on omasal nutrient flow and microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on omasal flow and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effect of dietary level of rumen-degraded protein on production and nitrogen metabolism in lactating dairy cows. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  C. Bearzi,et al.  Comparison of four markers for quantifying microbial protein flow from the rumen of lactating dairy cows. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  A. Rabiee,et al.  Effects of BioChlor and Fermenten on microbial protein synthesis in continuous culture fermenters. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  T. Nagaraja,et al.  Effects of type of supplemental carbohydrate and source of supplemental rumen degradable protein on low quality forage utilization by beef steers , 2004 .

[25]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effect of feeding protein supplements of differing degradability on omasal flow of microbial and undegraded protein. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  J. Marini,et al.  Nitrogen metabolism and recycling in Holstein heifers. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[27]  M. Ikeda Amino acid production processes. , 2003, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[28]  D. Mertens Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.

[29]  C.-M.J. Yang Response of forage fiber degradation by ruminal microorganisms to branched-chain volatile fatty acids, amino acids, and dipeptides. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  R. Wallace,et al.  Incorporation of [15N]Ammonia by the Cellulolytic Ruminal Bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenesBL2, Ruminococcus albus SY3, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17 , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  G. Broderick,et al.  Potential of fermentation byproducts as nitrogen supplements for lactating dairy cows. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  Rychlik,et al.  Mathematical estimations of hyper-ammonia producing ruminal bacteria and evidence for bacterial antagonism that decreases ruminal ammonia production(1). , 2000, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[33]  P. Huhtanen,et al.  Determination of reticulo-rumen and whole-stomach digestion in lactating cows by omasal canal or duodenal sampling , 2000, British Journal of Nutrition.

[34]  J. Firkins Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[35]  P. H. Robinson Modifying duodenal flow of amino acids by manipulation of dietary protein sources , 1997 .

[36]  P. Huhtanen,et al.  Omasal sampling technique for assessing fermentative digestion in the forestomach of dairy cows. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[37]  M. Stern,et al.  In vitro and in vivo comparisons of diaminopimelic acid and purines for estimating protein synthesis in the rumen , 1994 .

[38]  W. Chesbro,et al.  Improved techniques for dissociating particle-associated mixed ruminal microorganisms from ruminal digesta solids. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[39]  P. V. Soest,et al.  A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[40]  G. Broderick,et al.  Markers for quantifying microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[41]  R. Wallace,et al.  Metabolism of small peptides in rumen fluid. Accumulation of intermediates during hydrolysis of alanine oligomers, and comparison of peptidolytic activities of bacteria and protozoa , 1990 .

[42]  Kenneth Helrick,et al.  Official methods of analysis , 1990 .

[43]  G. Broderick,et al.  Metabolism of peptides and amino acids during in vitro protein degradation by mixed rumen organisms. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[44]  J. Russell,et al.  Enrichment and isolation of a ruminal bacterium with a very high specific activity of ammonia production , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[45]  R. Siddons Determination of digesta flow by continuous market infusion , 1986 .

[46]  D. Beever,et al.  Ytterbium acetate as a particulate-phase digesta-flow marker , 1985, British Journal of Nutrition.

[47]  M. Cotta,et al.  Effect of Peptides and Amino Acids on Efficiency of Rumen Bacterial Protein Synthesis in Continuous Culture , 1982 .

[48]  P. V. Van Soest,et al.  Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. , 1980, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[49]  W. Horwitz Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[50]  L. Satter,et al.  Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro , 1974, British Journal of Nutrition.

[51]  A. L. Chaney,et al.  Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. , 1962, Clinical chemistry.

[52]  J. Clegg,et al.  Gravimetric Determination of Amylase-Treated Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds with Refluxing in Beakers or Crucibles : Collaborative Study , 2022 .