Procurement decision making mechanism of divisible goods based on multi-attribute auction

Multi-attribute auction enables negotiation on several attributes in addition to the price such as quality, quantity, time of delivery and service levels. Most of the existing multi-attribute auction mechanisms are designed by considering a unique good or indivisible multiple goods. This paper focuses on designing a multi-attribute auction mechanism for addressing the decision making problem of multi-attribute and multi-source procurement of a kind of homogeneous continuous divisible goods (such as coal, oil, electricity and gas). The suppliers' optimal bidding strategies are discussed, and a bidding method named the minimum bid increment method is proposed to simulate the overall process of suppliers' multiple rounds of bidding. Theoretical analysis shows that our auction mechanism is an efficient mechanism, and satisfies the incentive compatibility conditions and the individual rationality conditions. Moreover, a multi-attribute auction example about the steam coal procurement is given to show how to implement our multi-attribute auction mechanism.

[1]  Giovanni Perrone,et al.  Designing multi-attribute auctions for engineering services procurement in new product development in the automotive context , 2010 .

[2]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  An Inverse-Optimization-Based Auction Mechanism to Support a Multiattribute RFQ Process , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Yeon-Koo Che Design competition through multidimensional auctions , 1993 .

[4]  Wang Ming-xi,et al.  Multi-Attribute Procurement Auction Theory and Application:A Review with Comments , 2009 .

[5]  G. B. Sheble,et al.  Interior-point linear programming algorithm for auction methods , 2000 .

[6]  Debasis Mishra,et al.  A multi-attribute reverse auction for outsourcing , 2002, Proceedings. 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[7]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Bidding in sealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Mamata Jenamani,et al.  An efficient reverse auction mechanism for limited supplier base , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[9]  Congjun Rao,et al.  Asymmetric Nash equilibrium in emission rights auctions , 2012 .

[10]  Stefan Strecker,et al.  Information revelation in multiattribute English auctions: A laboratory study , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Jun Li,et al.  Multi-attribute procurement auctions with risk averse suppliers , 2012 .

[12]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design and implementation of a brokerage service for electronic procurement , 1999, Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99.

[13]  Martin Bichler,et al.  An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Fabio Sciancalepore,et al.  Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Stuart E. Thiel,et al.  Some Evidence of the Winner's Curse , 1988 .

[16]  F. Branco The Design of Multidimensional Auctions , 1997 .

[17]  MingYan,et al.  A Multi-attribute Reverse Auction Decision Making Model Based on Linear Programming , 2012 .

[18]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Models for Iterative Multiattribute Procurement Auctions , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Murat Köksalan,et al.  An interactive approach for multi-attribute auctions , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Optimal Multi-Attribute Auctions for Divisible Goods , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..