On the Performance of Geometric Charts with Estimated Control Limits

The control chart based on the geometric distribution (geometric chart) has been shown to be competitive with p- or np-charts for monitoring the proportion nonconforming, especially for applications in high quality manufacturing environments. However, implementing a geometric chart is often based on the assumption that the in-control proportion nonconforming is known or accurately estimated. For a high quality process, an accurate parameter estimate may require a very large sample size that is seldom available. In this paper we investigate the sample size effect when the proportion nonconforming is estimated. An analytical approximation is derived to compute shift detection probabilities and run length distributions. It is found that the effect on the alarm probability can be significant even with sample sizes as large as 10,000. However, the average run length is only affected mildly unless the sample size is small and there is a large process improvement. In practice, the quantitative results of the paper can be used to determine the minimum number of items required for estimating the control limits of a geometric chart so that certain average run length requirements are met.

[1]  Trevor A Spedding,et al.  A Synthetic Control Chart for Detecting Fraction Nonconforming Increases , 2001 .

[2]  Lloyd S. Nelson,et al.  Column: Technical Aids: The Shewhart Control Chart--Tests for Special Causes , 1984 .

[3]  Kai Lai Chung,et al.  A Course in Probability Theory , 1949 .

[4]  Charles P. Quesenberry,et al.  Geometric Q Charts for High Quality Processes , 1995 .

[5]  Zhang Wu,et al.  Implementing Synthetic Control Charts for Attributes , 2001 .

[6]  W. John Braun.  Run length distributions for estimated attributes charts , 1999 .

[7]  J C Benneyan,et al.  Number-Between g-Type Statistical Quality Control Charts for Monitoring Adverse Events , 2001, Health care management science.

[8]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  X-Bar- and R-Chart Control Limits Based on A Small Number of Subgroups , 1969 .

[9]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  The use of probability limits for process control based on geometric distribution , 1997 .

[10]  Charles P. Quesenberry,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on Estimated Limits for and X Control Charts , 1993 .

[11]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Control Charts Based on Attribute Data: Bibliography and Review , 1997 .

[12]  Gemai Chen,et al.  THE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE RUN LENGTH DISTRIBUTION OF X̄ CHARTS WHEN CONTROL LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED Gemai Chen , 2003 .

[13]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Some procedures for decision making in controlling high yield processes , 1992 .

[14]  Eli A. Glushkovsky.  ‘On-line’ G-control chart for attribute data , 1994 .

[15]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Research Issues and Ideas in Statistical Process Control , 1999 .

[16]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  New approach to quality in a near-zero defect environment , 1994 .

[17]  Gemai Chen,et al.  The run length distributions of the R, s and s2 control charts when is estimated , 1998 .

[18]  Trevor A Spedding,et al.  A Synthetic Control Chart for Detecting Small Shifts in the Process Mean , 2000 .

[19]  Charles P. Quesenberry,et al.  DPV Q charts for start-up processes and short or long runs , 1991 .

[20]  James C. Benneyan,et al.  Statistical Control Charts Based on a Geometric Distribution , 1992 .

[21]  Trevor A Spedding,et al.  Implementing Synthetic Control Charts , 2000 .

[22]  Roger M. Sauter,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[23]  Lloyd S. Nelson,et al.  A Control Chart for Parts-Per-Million Nonconforming Items , 1994 .