GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis

BackgroundDespite the recent success of genome-wide association studies in identifying novel loci contributing effects to complex human traits, such as type 2 diabetes and obesity, much of the genetic component of variation in these phenotypes remains unexplained. One way to improving power to detect further novel loci is through meta-analysis of studies from the same population, increasing the sample size over any individual study. Although statistical software analysis packages incorporate routines for meta-analysis, they are ill equipped to meet the challenges of the scale and complexity of data generated in genome-wide association studies.ResultsWe have developed flexible, open-source software for the meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. The software incorporates a variety of error trapping facilities, and provides a range of meta-analysis summary statistics. The software is distributed with scripts that allow simple formatting of files containing the results of each association study and generate graphical summaries of genome-wide meta-analysis results.ConclusionsThe GWAMA (Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis) software has been developed to perform meta-analysis of summary statistics generated from genome-wide association studies of dichotomous phenotypes or quantitative traits. Software with source files, documentation and example data files are freely available online at http://www.well.ox.ac.uk/GWAMA.

[1]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  Practical aspects of imputation-driven meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[2]  Inês Barroso,et al.  Variants in MTNR1B influence fasting glucose levels , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Laura J. Scott,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Genome-wide association scan meta-analysis identifies three loci influencing adiposity and fat distribution , 2022 .

[4]  Zhaohui S. Qin,et al.  A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs , 2007, Nature.

[5]  B. Browning,et al.  Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[7]  Tania B. Huedo-Medina,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? , 2006, Psychological methods.

[8]  Evangelos Evangelou,et al.  Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Investigations , 2007, PloS one.

[9]  P. Donnelly,et al.  A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Christian Gieger,et al.  Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls , 2007, Nature.

[12]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[14]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[15]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[16]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.