Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and non-adopters

Although mobile learning systems offer several benefits for students, academic staff and universities, from easily access and learning anywhere and anytime, the use and acceptance of this new technology in Jordan still very low. However, acceptance of mobile learning by students is crucial to the success of mobile learning. The factors that affect the use and user acceptance of mobile learning are still controversial. Thus, this study mainly proposes an integrated model, with the aim of identifying the most influential factors that may encourage or impede students and universities in Jordan in moving towards acceptance and adoption of mobile learning applications. The proposed model was evaluated empirically with 1200 students from both two groups of universities that already used the mobile learning technology and non-adopters universities in Jordan. The model aims to examine the impact of 11 factors on the adoption of mobile learning applications that were categorised based on four fundamental constructs are: (i) technological factors (security, privacy, compatibility, relative advantage and trust), (ii) organizational factors (resistance to change and technology readiness), (iii) cultural factors and (iv) quality factors (quality of system, quality of content and quality of service). The key findings include: (1) resistance to change, security and privacy concerns still limit mobile learning acceptance and adoption in Jordanian universities; (2) some factors like compatibility, technology readiness, and culture were found to have a negative effect on the intention to use of the mobile learning; (3) five factors (relative advantage, trust, quality of system, quality of content and quality of service) were found to have a positive effect on the intention to use of the mobile learning; and (4) our research also found that the effect of these factors differed in universities that already used the mobile learning and non-adopters. Finally, it is expected that the findings of this research can assist university decision makers, mobile learning application providers and the research community in introducing better strategies for encouraging adoption and acceptance of this technology.

[1]  Ahmad Althunibat,et al.  Determining the factors influencing students' intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Eunil Park,et al.  An Integrated Adoption Model of Mobile Cloud Services: Exploration of Key Determinants and Extension of Technology Acceptance Model , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[3]  C.-H. Cheng,et al.  A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Shu-Chu Chen,et al.  A Study of EFL College Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning , 2015 .

[5]  Maro Vlachopoulou,et al.  Modeling users’ acceptance of mobile services , 2012, Electronic Commerce Research.

[6]  Jung-Wen Hsia,et al.  The effects of locus of control on university students’ mobile learning adoption , 2016, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[7]  Nor Azan Mat Zin,et al.  The success of learning management system among distance learners in Malaysian universities , 2010 .

[8]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[9]  Yongqiang Sun,et al.  The dark side of elderly acceptance of preventive mobile health services in China , 2013, Electron. Mark..

[10]  Tao Zhou.  Examining continuance usage of mobile Internet services from the perspective of resistance to change , 2014 .

[11]  Vimala Balakrishnan,et al.  Students' learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[12]  Bülent Güven,et al.  Evaluating Students' Beliefs in Problem Solving Process: A Case Study. , 2016 .

[13]  Mohamed Sarrab,et al.  Exploring Major Challenges and Benefits of M-learning Adoption , 2013 .

[14]  Florence Martin,et al.  Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[15]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Empirical investigation to explore factors that achieve high quality of mobile learning system based on students’ perspectives , 2016 .

[17]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[18]  FurnellSteven,et al.  Information security policy compliance model in organizations , 2016 .

[19]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study , 2018, Education and Information Technologies.

[20]  Tze Wei Liew,et al.  Exploring the effects of a non-interactive talking avatar on social presence, credibility, trust, and patronage intention in an e-commerce website , 2017, Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences.

[21]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  T. Thomas,et al.  The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana , 2013 .

[23]  Carlos Delgado,et al.  Factors Influencing the Use of Mobile Technologies in a University Environment: A Case from Latin America , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[24]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  South Korean university students’ mobile learning acceptance and experience based on the perceived attributes, system quality and resistance , 2018 .

[25]  Mohammed-Issa Riad Mousa Jaradat.  Understanding individuals' perceptions, determinants and the moderating effects of age and gender on the adoption of mobile learning: developing country perspective , 2014, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[26]  Hossein Mohammadi,et al.  Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  Patient Rambe,et al.  An empirical analysis of the determinants of mobile instant messaging appropriation in university learning , 2016, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[30]  Mohammed Al-Owain,et al.  ILDR1: Novel mutation and a rare cause of congenital deafness in the Saudi Arabian population. , 2014, European journal of medical genetics.

[31]  Peter B. Obiria,et al.  A location-based privacy-preserving m-learning model to enhance distance education in Kenya , 2017, Journal of Computers in Education.

[32]  Mary T. Moser,et al.  Electronic reading and digital library technologies: understanding learner expectation and usage intent for mobile learning , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[33]  Yung-Ming Cheng,et al.  Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance , 2012, Internet Res..

[34]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Eunil Park,et al.  Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services , 2018, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[36]  C. Gibson,et al.  Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research , 2005 .

[37]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Employees' adherence to information security policies: An exploratory field study , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Vanessa P. Dennen,et al.  Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users , 2016, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[39]  H. Rubin,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data , 1995 .

[40]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Investigating Students' Perceptions on Mobile Learning Services , 2014, Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol..

[41]  Sang-Chul Lee,et al.  Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[43]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[44]  DR. Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  PROPOSING A NEW TECHNICAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE LEARNING APPLICATIONS , 2019 .

[45]  David C. Yen,et al.  An exploratory study to understand the critical factors affecting the decision to adopt cloud computing in Taiwan hospital , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[46]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[47]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems and User Resistance: Theory and Practice , 1988, Comput. J..

[48]  Douglas P. Twitchell,et al.  Employees' Adherence to Information Security Policies: A Partial Replication , 2016, AMCIS.

[49]  Ahmad Abu-Al-Aish,et al.  International of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of M-Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education , 2022 .

[50]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[51]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[52]  M. Kamal,et al.  Factors influencing e‐government adoption in Pakistan , 2012 .

[53]  Nadire Cavus,et al.  Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning , 2011 .

[54]  Won Sug Shin,et al.  The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement , 2015 .

[55]  Xing Zhang,et al.  How Environmental Uncertainty Moderates the Effect of Relative Advantage and Perceived Credibility on the Adoption of Mobile Health Services by Chinese Organizations in the Big Data Era , 2016, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[56]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Jared Keengwe,et al.  Mobile learning and integration of mobile technologies in education , 2013, Education and Information Technologies.

[58]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[59]  Andrew J. Rohm,et al.  Factors influencing Chinese youth consumers' acceptance of mobile marketing , 2010 .

[60]  Sven Laumer,et al.  User personality and resistance to mandatory information systems in organizations: a theoretical model and empirical test of dispositional resistance to change , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[61]  I. Qureshi,et al.  M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country , 2012 .

[62]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Convergence of Structural Equation Modeling and Multilevel Modeling , 2011 .

[63]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance , 2016, Journal of Computers in Education.

[64]  E M Rogers,et al.  Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. , 1995, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[65]  Jin-Hyuk Hong,et al.  Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones , 2012, UbiComp.

[66]  Oded Nov,et al.  Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An integrative model , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[68]  Mohammed Amin Almaiah.  Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system services in University of Jordan , 2018, Education and Information Technologies.

[69]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[70]  Iuliana Dobre,et al.  Learning Management Systems for Higher Education - An Overview of Available Options for Higher Education Organizations , 2015 .

[71]  DR. Mohammed Amin Almaiah,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR DETERMINING THE SUCCESS FACTORS OF E-LEARNING SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION USING DELPHI TECHNIQUE , 2018 .

[72]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Transforming Government : People , Process and Policy , 2017 .

[73]  Nari Kim,et al.  Factors predicting online university students’ use of a mobile learning management system (m-LMS) , 2016, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[74]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[75]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[76]  S. Kong,et al.  RETRACTED: Affordances and constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers' perspectives , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[77]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS) , 2007 .

[78]  D. Mitrany.  Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[79]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Differences between mobile learning environmental preferences of high school teachers and students in Taiwan: a structural equation model analysis , 2016 .

[80]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Work routines as an object of resistance during information systems implementations: theoretical foundation and empirical evidence , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[81]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[82]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  RETRACTED CHAPTER: Affordances and Constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for Learning in Higher Education: Teachers’ Perspectives , 2017 .

[83]  Mike Sharples,et al.  A theory of learning for the mobile age: learning through conversation and exploration across contexts , 2010 .

[84]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption , 2013, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[85]  Jaeki Song,et al.  An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[86]  Steven Furnell,et al.  Information security policy compliance model in organizations , 2016, Comput. Secur..

[87]  Hyeon Woo Lee,et al.  Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University , 2014, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[88]  PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR EXPLORING THE MAJOR PROBLEMS AND ACTIVITIES OF MOBILE LEARNING SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY OF JORDAN , 2016 .