Shock interactions with heavy gaseous elliptic cylinders: Two leeward-side shock competition modes and a heuristic model for interfacial circulation deposition at early times

We identify two different modes, types I and II, of the interaction for planar shocks accelerating heavy prolate gaseous ellipses. These modes arise from different interactions of the incident shock (IS) and transmitted shock (TS) on the leeward side of the ellipse. A time ratio t_T/t_I(M,η,λ,γ_0,γ_b), which characterizes the mode of interaction, is derived heuristically. Here, the principal parameters governing the interaction are the Mach number of the shock (M), the ratio of the density of the ellipse to the ambient gas density, (η>1), γ_0, γ_b (the ratios of specific heats of the two gases), λ (the aspect ratio). Salient events in shock–ellipse interactions are identified and correlated with their signatures in circulation budgets and on-axis space–time pressure diagrams. The two modes yield different mechanisms of the baroclinic vorticity generation. We present a heuristic model for the net baroclinic circulation generated on the interface at the end of the early-time phase by both the IS and TS and validate the model via numerical simulations of the Euler equations. In the range 1.2⩽M⩽3.5, 1.54⩽η⩽5.04, and λ=1.5 and 3.0, our model predicts the baroclinic circulation on the interface within a band of ±10% in comparison to converged numerical simulations.

[1]  J. Stone,et al.  The hydrodynamics of shock-cloud interactions in three dimensions , 1995 .

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  On the hydrodynamic interaction of shock waves with interstellar clouds. 1: Nonradiative shocks in small clouds , 1994 .

[3]  Ravi Samtaney,et al.  Circulation deposition on shock-accelerated planar and curved density-stratified interfaces: models and scaling laws , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  J. Ray Baroclinic Circulation Generation on Shock Accelerated Slow/fast Gas Interfaces , 1998 .

[5]  Ravi Samtaney,et al.  Hypervelocity Richtmyer–Meshkov instability , 1997 .

[6]  I-Liang Chern,et al.  Vorticity generation and evolution in shock‐accelerated density‐stratified interfaces , 1992 .

[7]  Zabusky,et al.  Vortex paradigm for shock-accelerated density-stratified interfaces. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[8]  Ravi Samtaney,et al.  On initial‐value and self‐similar solutions of the compressible Euler equations , 1996 .

[9]  J. Haas,et al.  Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  D. Pullin,et al.  Direct simulation methods for compressible inviscid ideal-gas flow , 1980 .

[11]  N. Zabusky,et al.  Shock cavity implosion morphologies and vortical projectile generation in axisymmetric shock–spherical fast/slow bubble interactions , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Norman J. Zabusky,et al.  VORTEX PARADIGM FOR ACCELERATED INHOMOGENEOUS FLOWS: Visiometrics for the Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov Environments , 1999 .

[13]  James J. Quirk,et al.  On the dynamics of a shock–bubble interaction , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.