NMR analysis of protein interactions.

[1]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Various strategies of using residual dipolar couplings in NMR‐driven protein docking: Application to Lys48‐linked di‐ubiquitin and validation against 15N‐relaxation data , 2005, Proteins.

[2]  G Marius Clore,et al.  Solution NMR Structure of the 48-kDa IIAMannose-HPr Complex of the Escherichia coli Mannose Phosphotransferase System* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  M. Ubbink,et al.  Structure of the Complex between Plastocyanin and Cytochrome f from the Cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. PCC 7119 as Determined by Paramagnetic NMR , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  M. Daugherty,et al.  A single intermolecular contact mediates intramolecular stabilization of both RNA and protein. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  C. Dominguez,et al.  The RNA recognition motif, a plastic RNA‐binding platform to regulate post‐transcriptional gene expression , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[6]  Andres Ramos,et al.  The double‐stranded RNA‐binding motif, a versatile macromolecular docking platform , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[7]  Gary W. Daughdrill,et al.  NMR chemical shift and relaxation measurements provide evidence for the coupled folding and binding of the p53 transactivation domain , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  C. M. Dupureur NMR studies of restriction enzyme-DNA interactions: role of conformation in sequence specificity. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[9]  I. Shimada,et al.  An NMR method for the determination of protein-binding interfaces using dioxygen-induced spin-lattice relaxation enhancement. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  W. Chazin,et al.  Insights into hRPA32 C-terminal domain–mediated assembly of the simian virus 40 replisome , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  M. Blackledge Recent progress in the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics in solution from residual dipolar couplings , 2005 .

[12]  J. Qin,et al.  Structure of an ultraweak protein-protein complex and its crucial role in regulation of cell morphology and motility. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[13]  Composition and sequence-dependent binding of RNA to the nucleocapsid protein of Moloney murine leukemia virus. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[14]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Solution structure of the CD3εδ ectodomain and comparison with CD3εγ as a basis for modeling T cell receptor topology and signaling , 2004 .

[15]  J. Prestegard,et al.  Rapid analysis of large protein-protein complexes using NMR-derived orientational constraints: the 95 kDa complex of LpxA with acyl carrier protein. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  M. Ubbink,et al.  Transient complexes of redox proteins: structural and dynamic details from NMR studies , 2004, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[17]  G. Clore,et al.  Characterization of nonspecific protein-DNA interactions by 1H paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Versatility of the carboxy‐terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase in transcriptional activation: use of the DNA contact site as a protein contact site for MarA , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  M. Summers,et al.  Structural basis for packaging the dimeric genome of Moloney murine leukaemia virus , 2004, Nature.

[20]  S. Becker,et al.  Structure and DNA‐binding properties of the cytolysin regulator CylR2 from Enterococcus faecalis , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Hugo O Villar,et al.  Using NMR for ligand discovery and optimization. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[22]  D. Fushman,et al.  Determining domain orientation in macromolecules by using spin-relaxation and residual dipolar coupling measurements , 2004 .

[23]  A. LiWang,et al.  Structure of the C-terminal domain of the clock protein KaiA in complex with a KaiC-derived peptide: implications for KaiC regulation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Kaptein,et al.  Structure and Flexibility Adaptation in Nonspecific and Specific Protein-DNA Complexes , 2004, Science.

[25]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Model building of a protein-protein complexed structure using saturation transfer and residual dipolar coupling without paired intermolecular NOE , 2004, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[26]  W. Chazin,et al.  Physical Interaction between Replication Protein A and Rad51 Promotes Exchange on Single-stranded DNA* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Michael Sattler,et al.  Nucleic acid 3′-end recognition by the Argonaute2 PAZ domain , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[28]  Anthony Henras,et al.  Structural basis for recognition of the AGNN tetraloop RNA fold by the double-stranded RNA-binding domain of Rnt1p RNase III. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Theobald,et al.  Structural basis for telomeric single-stranded DNA recognition by yeast Cdc13. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Charles D Schwieters,et al.  Ensemble approach for NMR structure refinement against (1)H paramagnetic relaxation enhancement data arising from a flexible paramagnetic group attached to a macromolecule. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Scott D Emr,et al.  Ubiquitin interactions of NZF zinc fingers , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[32]  Soyoun Kim,et al.  Solution structure of the complex formed by the two N-terminal RNA-binding domains of nucleolin and a pre-rRNA target. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  A docking approach to the study of copper trafficking proteins; interaction between metallochaperones and soluble domains of copper ATPases. , 2004, Structure.

[34]  Rolf Boelens,et al.  Structural model of the UbcH5B/CNOT4 complex revealed by combining NMR, mutagenesis, and docking approaches. , 2004, Structure.

[35]  Mingjie Zhang,et al.  The tetrameric L27 domain complex as an organization platform for supramolecular assemblies , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[36]  Michael Sattler,et al.  Structural basis of single-stranded RNA recognition. , 2004, Accounts of chemical research.

[37]  H. Dyson,et al.  Recognition of the mRNA AU-rich element by the zinc finger domain of TIS11d , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[38]  V. Gaponenko,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of NMR Structures of Large Proteins Using Pseudocontact Shifts as Long-Range Restraints , 2004, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[39]  Ernest D Laue,et al.  Structural basis of HP1/PXVXL motif peptide interactions and HP1 localisation to heterochromatin , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[40]  P. Hajduk,et al.  SOS-NMR: a saturation transfer NMR-based method for determining the structures of protein-ligand complexes. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Interaction of the TAZ1 Domain of the CREB-Binding Protein with the Activation Domain of CITED2 , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  G. Marius Clore,et al.  Molecular Basis for Synergistic Transcriptional Activation by Oct1 and Sox2 Revealed from the Solution Structure of the 42-kDa Oct1·Sox2·Hoxb1-DNA Ternary Transcription Factor Complex* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Solution structure of the CD3epsilondelta ectodomain and comparison with CD3epsilongamma as a basis for modeling T cell receptor topology and signaling. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  G. Wagner,et al.  Ribosome Loading onto the mRNA Cap Is Driven by Conformational Coupling between eIF4G and eIF4E , 2003, Cell.

[45]  Aaron Klug,et al.  Crystal structure of a zinc-finger–RNA complex reveals two modes of molecular recognition , 2003, Nature.

[46]  V. Dötsch,et al.  Fast mapping of protein-protein interfaces by NMR spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  Angela M Gronenborn,et al.  Filtering and selection of structural models: Combining docking and NMR , 2003, Proteins.

[48]  J. Feigon,et al.  Structural determinants for the binding of ubiquitin‐like domains to the proteasome , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[49]  W. Chazin,et al.  NMR study on the interaction between RPA and DNA decamer containing cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in the presence of XPA: implication for damage verification and strand-specific dual incision in nucleotide excision repair. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[50]  C. Arrowsmith,et al.  Chemical shift changes provide evidence for overlapping single-stranded DNA- and XPA-binding sites on the 70 kDa subunit of human replication protein A. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  S. V. Van Doren,et al.  Global orientation of bound MMP-3 and N-TIMP-1 in solution via residual dipolar couplings. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[52]  G. Clore,et al.  Solution Structure of the Phosphoryl Transfer Complex between the Signal-transducing Protein IIAGlucose and the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Glucose Transporter IICBGlucose of the Escherichia coli Glucose Phosphotransferase System* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  M. Bottomley,et al.  Crystal structure and nuclear magnetic resonance analyses of the SAND domain from glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein-1 reveals deoxyribonucleic acid and zinc binding regions. , 2003, Molecular endocrinology.

[54]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Structural basis for negative regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α by CITED2 , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[55]  W. Salerno,et al.  Solution Structure of a CUE-Ubiquitin Complex Reveals a Conserved Mode of Ubiquitin Binding , 2003, Cell.

[56]  Primoz Pristovsek,et al.  Structural Analysis of the DNA-binding Domain of theErwinia amylovora RcsB Protein and Its Interaction with the RcsAB Box* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  Charles D Schwieters,et al.  Docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of highly ambiguous intermolecular distance restraints derived from 1H/15N chemical shift mapping and backbone 15N-1H residual dipolar couplings using conjoined rigid body/torsion angle dynamics. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[59]  D. Wyss,et al.  Structures of protein-protein complexes are docked using only NMR restraints from residual dipolar coupling and chemical shift perturbations. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[60]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  TreeDock: a tool for protein docking based on minimizing van der Waals energies. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[61]  D. Case,et al.  Automated prediction of 15N, 13Cα, 13Cβ and 13C′ chemical shifts in proteins using a density functional database , 2001, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[62]  Ana C. Messias,et al.  Structural Basis for Recognition of the Intron Branch Site RNA by Splicing Factor 1 , 2001, Science.

[63]  J H Prestegard,et al.  Partial alignment of biomolecules: an aid to NMR characterization. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[64]  Françoise Guerlesquin,et al.  A novel approach for assesing macromolecular complexes combining soft‐docking calculations with NMR data , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[65]  H. Kessler,et al.  Applications of NMR in drug discovery. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[66]  F. Allain,et al.  Molecular basis of sequence‐specific recognition of pre‐ribosomal RNA by nucleolin , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[67]  G M Clore,et al.  Accurate and rapid docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of intermolecular nuclear overhauser enhancement data and dipolar couplings by rigid body minimization. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Hideo Takahashi,et al.  A novel NMR method for determining the interfaces of large protein–protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[69]  R. Riek,et al.  Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.