Factors affecting the quality of laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a cohort study from two randomized controlled trials

Background: Laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection (LND) for gastric cancer has a wide range and high difficulty. In the past, the quality of surgery was often judged by the time of the operation or the amount of blood loss, but the analysis based on surgical video was rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the quality of laparoscopic D2 LND for gastric cancer and postoperative complications. Methods: The surgical video and clinicopathological data of 610 patients in two randomized controlled trials in our center from 2013 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Klass-02-QC LND scale and general error score tool were used to quantitatively evaluate the intraoperative performance of D2 LND. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative complications. Results: The overall incidence of complications (CD classification≥2) was 20.6%; the incidence of surgical complications was 6.9%. According to whether the LND score reached 44, patients were divided into a qualified group (73%) and a not-qualified group (27%). Event score (ES) by quartile was divided into grade 1 (21.7%), grade 2 (26%), grade 3 (28%), and grade 4 (24.3%) from low to high. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that ES greater than or equal to 3, tumor size greater than or equal to 35 mm, and cTNM >II were independent risk factors for not-qualified LND. Male,tumor size greater than or equal to 35 mm and cTNM >II were independent risk factors for grade 4 ES. Not-qualified LND (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.16–3.89, P=0.021), grade 4 ES (OR=3.21, 95% CI: 1.52–3.90, P=0.035), and cTNM >II (OR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.39–7.33, P=0.041) were independent risk factors for postoperative surgical complications. Conclusions: The qualification of LND and intraoperative events based on surgical video are the independent influencing factors of postoperative complications of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Specialist training and teaching based on surgical video may help to improve the surgical skills of specialists and improve the postoperative outcome of patients.

[1]  G. Tiberio,et al.  Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study , 2021, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  F. Pruvot,et al.  Predicting Intraoperative Difficulty of Open Liver Resections , 2021, Annals of surgery.

[3]  Y. K. Park,et al.  Surgeon Quality Control and Standardization of D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (KLASS-02-QC). , 2020, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition) , 2020, Gastric Cancer.

[5]  J. Aronson,et al.  STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. , 2019, International journal of surgery.

[6]  K. Tao,et al.  [Early postoperative complications and risk factors in laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. , 2019, Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery.

[7]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Technical Performance as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[8]  Gang Zhao,et al.  Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA.

[9]  Teruhiko Fukaya Japanese , 2018, Definitions.

[10]  W. Allum,et al.  Do all the European surgeons perform the same D2? The need of D2 audit in Europe , 2018, Updates in Surgery.

[11]  R. Agha,et al.  A protocol for the development of the STROCSS guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery , 2017, International journal of surgery protocols.

[12]  Gang Zhao,et al.  Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Tyler R Grenda,et al.  Using Surgical Video to Improve Technique and Skill. , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Iman Ghaderi,et al.  Technical skills assessment toolbox: a review using the unitary framework of validity. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[15]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery , 2013, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  N. Voirin,et al.  Influence of experience on performance of individual surgeons in thyroid surgery: prospective cross sectional multicentre study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  J. Ji,et al.  Complications after radical gastrectomy following FOLFOX7 neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer , 2011, World journal of surgical oncology.

[18]  Toshiharu Yamaguchi,et al.  Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  I. Choi,et al.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Clinical Staging Assessed by Computed Tomography in Resectable Gastric Cancer Patients: A Viewpoint in the Era of Preoperative Treatment , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Jesper Lagergren,et al.  Surgeon Volume is a Poor Proxy for Skill in Esophageal Cancer Surgery , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[21]  P. Stotland,et al.  Safe implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy in a community-based general surgery practice , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  A. Lefor,et al.  Visceral Obesity Predicts Surgical Outcomes after Laparoscopic Colectomy for Sigmoid Colon Cancer , 2008, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[23]  E. Targarona,et al.  Can We Predict Immediate Outcome After Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery? Multivariate Analysis of Clinical, Anatomic, and Pathologic Features After 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Pelvic Anatomy , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[24]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[25]  Masao Tanaka,et al.  Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution: analysis of the initial 100 procedures. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[27]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[28]  J. Böhnke Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Assessment of the quality of surgery within randomised controlled trials for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal cancer: a systematic review. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[30]  Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) , 2011, Gastric Cancer.

[31]  F. Sansonna,et al.  Total and subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy.

[32]  D. Hinkle,et al.  Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .