Prioritizing clinical preventive services: a review and framework with implications for community preventive services.

Setting priorities on the basis of factors such as health impact and economic value is the key first step to ensure that the most important services receive the most attention. Few prioritization efforts have been published that produce either rankings or information that can guide decision making. We propose a framework to help decision makers and clinicians balance short-term demands against long-term objectives. This framework provides guidance for decisions about scope, prioritization criteria, evidence review methods, evaluation of criteria fit, and presentation of results. The framework is the result of our experience setting priorities among clinical preventive services. It has not been tested in prioritizing community interventions and other health care services but should provide a useful starting point for designing priority-setting efforts in those areas.

[1]  L. Segal,et al.  Time to give nutrition interventions a higher profile: cost-effectiveness of 10 nutrition interventions. , 2007, Health promotion international.

[2]  T. Vos,et al.  A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project , 2006, International Journal of Obesity.

[3]  Michael J Goodman,et al.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: methods. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Michael J Goodman,et al.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  D. Mortimer,et al.  Economic evaluation of interventions for problem drinking and alcohol dependence: cost per QALY estimates. , 2005, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[6]  A. Thrift,et al.  Development and application of Model of Resource Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes for Stroke (MORUCOS): An Australian economic model for stroke , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[7]  R. Badgett,et al.  Number needed to treat: a descriptor for weighing therapeutic options. , 2005, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[8]  T. Vos,et al.  Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Mental Health: Helping Policy-Makers Prioritize and Plan Health Services , 2005 .

[9]  L. Seeff,et al.  Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[10]  L. Seeff,et al.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[11]  K. Thorpe,et al.  Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending? , 2004, Health affairs.

[12]  S. Bryan,et al.  Physical Activity and Obesity in Canadian Women , 2004, BMC women's health.

[13]  Rob Carter,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Major Depression in Children and Adolescents , 2004, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[14]  A. Thrift,et al.  Trial Application of a Model of Resource Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes for Stroke (MORUCOS) to Assist Priority Setting in Stroke , 2004, Stroke.

[15]  J. Gerberding,et al.  Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. , 2004, JAMA.

[16]  Harold Alan Pincus,et al.  The most expensive medical conditions in America. , 2002, Health affairs.

[17]  Jeffrey R. Harris,et al.  Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  Jeffrey R. Harris,et al.  Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Using cost-effectiveness league tables to compare interventions to prevent sexual transmission of HIV. , 2001, AIDS.

[20]  D. Gyrd-Hansen,et al.  The relative economics of screening for colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[21]  S. Vernon,et al.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  C Ham,et al.  Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience. , 1997, Health policy.

[23]  Cindy Farquhar,et al.  3 The Cochrane Library , 1996 .

[24]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[25]  McGinnis Jm,et al.  Actual causes of death in the United States. , 1993 .

[26]  D. Jamison,et al.  Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries , 1993 .

[27]  Dean T. Jamison,et al.  World development report 1993 : investing in health , 1993 .

[28]  S. Wilson Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[29]  A D Mickalide,et al.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 1986, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[30]  G. O. Lignac [Actual causes of death]. , 1951, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[31]  D. Jamison Investing in Health , 2006 .

[32]  Stuart Peacock,et al.  Trial of Program Budgetting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) to assist cancer control planning in Australia , 2000 .

[33]  Anne C. Haddix,et al.  Prevention effectiveness : a guide to decision analysis and economic evaluation , 1996 .

[34]  A. Cairncross The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development , 1959 .