Algebraic Multigrid Methods (AMG) for the Efficient Solution of Fully Implicit Formulations in Reservoir Simulation

A primary challenge for a new generation of reservoir simulators is the accurate description of multiphase flow in highly heterogeneous media and very complex geometries. However, many initiatives in this direction have encountered difficulties in that current solver technology is still insufficient to account for the increasing complexity of coupled linear systems arising in fully implicit formulations. In this respect, a few works have made particular progress in partially exploiting the physics of the problem in the form of two-stage preconditioners. Two-stage preconditioners are based on the idea that coupled system solutions are mainly determined by the solution of their elliptic components (i.e., pressure). Thus, the procedure consists of extracting and accurately solving pressure subsystems. Residuals associated with this solution are corrected with an additional preconditioning step that recovers part of the global information contained in the original system. Optimized and highly complex hierarchical methods such as algebraic multigrid (AMG) offer an efficient alternative for solving linear systems that show a "discretely elliptic" nature. When applicable, the major advantage of AMG is its numerical scalability; that is, the numerical work required to solve a given type of matrix problem grows only linearly with the number of variables. Consequently, interest in incorporating AMG methods as basic linear solvers in industrial oil reservoir simulation codes has been steadily increasing for the solution of pressure blocks. Generally, however, the preconditioner influences the properties of the pressure block to some extent by performing certain algebraic manipulations. Often, the modified pressure blocks are “less favorable” for an efficient treatment by AMG. In this work, we discuss strategies for solving the fully implicit systems that preserve (or generate) the desired ellipticity property required by AMG methods. Additionally, we introduce an iterative coupling scheme as an alternative to fully implicit formulations that is faster and also amenable for AMG implementations. Hence, we demonstrate that our AMG implementation can be applied to efficiently deal with the mixed elliptic-hyperbolic character of these problems. Numerical experiments reveal that the proposed methodology is promising for solving large-scale, complex reservoir problems.

[1]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Parallel Scalable Unstructured CPR-Type Linear Solver for Reservoir Simulation , 2005 .

[2]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  An Extensible Architecture for Next Generation Scalable Parallel Reservoir Simulation , 2005 .

[3]  Klaus Stüben,et al.  Algebraic Multigrid for Industrial Semiconductor Device Simulation , 2003 .

[4]  Wei-Pai Tang,et al.  Performance Issues for Iterative Solvers in Device Simulation , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  R.D. Falgout,et al.  An Introduction to Algebraic Multigrid Computing , 2006, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[6]  A. Firoozabadi,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Water Injection in Disconnected and Connected Fractured Media Using Jacobian-free Fully Implicit Control Volume Method , 2004 .

[7]  W. M. Coughran,et al.  The alternate-block-factorization procedure for systems of partial differential equations , 1989 .

[8]  Rainer Helmig,et al.  Efficient fully-coupled solution techniques for two-phase flow in porous media: Parallel multigrid solution and large scale computations , 1999 .

[9]  K. Stüben A review of algebraic multigrid , 2001 .

[10]  Robert W. Dutton,et al.  An approach to construct pre-conditioning matrices for block iteration of linear equations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[11]  Hector Manuel Klie Krylov-Secant methods for solving large-scale systems of coupled nonlinear parabolic equations , 1997 .

[12]  Stephen F. McCormick,et al.  Multigrid Methods for Three-Dimensional Petroleum Reservoir Simulation , 1989 .

[13]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: a comparison of upscaling techniques , 2001 .

[14]  Robert Scheichl,et al.  Decoupling and Block Preconditioning for Sedimentary Basin Simulations , 2003 .

[15]  Jun Liu,et al.  Next Generation Parallel Computing for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation , 2005 .

[16]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  A parallel, implicit, cell‐centered method for two‐phase flow with a preconditioned Newton–Krylov solver , 1997 .

[17]  StübenKlaus Algebraic multigrid (AMG) , 1983 .

[18]  K. Chen,et al.  Matrix preconditioning techniques and applications , 2005 .

[19]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Iterative Solution Methods for Modeling Multiphase Flow in Porous Media Fully Implicitly , 2003, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  O. Axelsson Iterative solution methods , 1995 .

[21]  R. P. Kendall,et al.  Constrained Residual Acceleration of Conjugate Residual Methods , 1985 .

[22]  Klaus Stüben,et al.  Algebraic Multigrid for Selected PDE Systems , 2002 .

[23]  Howard C. Elman,et al.  Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics , 2014 .

[24]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  Incomplete Factorization Methods for Fully Implicit Simulation of Enhanced Oil Recovery , 1984 .

[25]  Bret L. Beckner,et al.  Next Generation Reservoir Simulation Using Russian Linear Solvers , 2006 .

[26]  Tanja Clees,et al.  AMG Strategies for PDE Systems with Applications in Industrial Semiconductor Simulation , 2005 .

[27]  P.K.W. Vinsome,et al.  Block iterative methods for fully implicit reservoir simulation , 1982 .

[28]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Multilevel ILU decomposition , 1999, Numerische Mathematik.