Technical analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (drones) for agricultural applications

Constant technological developments of remote sensing techniques utilizing drones (specifically of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, UAV) are increasing spatial and temporal resolution of data available for land and crop management. However, despite the promising potential, actual implementation of UAVs continues to be quite limited. Low costs and maintenance of the vehicles are advantageous in exploring agricultural applications, however, inadequate performances are still limiting their full capability. Three main categories of unmanned aerial vehicles are determined as: fixed wing, helicopters and multicopters. The performance and applicability of such systems depend on multiple factors such as the aircraft mass, payload capacity, average dimensions, flying range, average speed, expenses, etc. The present paper proposes a technical analysis on unmanned aerial vehicles’ performances in order to understand their actual applicability to agricultural operations. In order to achieve this, the technical sheets of over 250 models available on the market have been analyzed and summarized. The aim of the paper is to synthesize specific information in order to acquire a better understanding of effective applicability to the agricultural field.

[1]  Ricardo Valerdi Cost Metrics for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2005 .

[2]  SOIL COLOUR SPECTRAL ANALYSIS , 2013 .

[3]  D. Mulla Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps , 2013 .

[4]  Ke Li,et al.  Open-pit mining geomorphic feature characterisation , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[5]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones , 2015, Nature.

[6]  F. Marinello,et al.  Using SALUS Model for Medium and Long Term Simulations of Energy Efficiency in Different Tillage Systems , 2014 .

[7]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[8]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Environmental and economic benefits of variable rate nitrogen fertilization in a nitrate vulnerable zone. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Jānis Vība,et al.  SYNTHESIS OF A ROBOT FISH PROTOTYPE , 2011 .

[10]  M. Meron,et al.  Crop water status estimation using thermography: multi-year model development using ground-based thermal images , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[11]  F. Marinello,et al.  Application of the Kinect sensor for dynamic soil surface characterization , 2015, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  INVESTIGATION OF FLIGHT OF MICRO AERIAL VEHICLE WITH FLAPPING WINGS , 2014 .

[13]  P. Tarolli,et al.  Metrics for quantifying anthropogenic impacts on geomorphology: road networks , 2016 .

[14]  M. A. Moreno,et al.  Applications of georeferenced high-resolution images obtained with unmanned aerial vehicles. Part I: Description of image acquisition and processing , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  S. Carmignato,et al.  Critical Factors in Cantilever Near-Field Scanning Optical Microscopy , 2014, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[16]  Aleksis Liekna,et al.  TOWARDS PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF SWARM ROBOTICS: OVERVIEW OF SWARM TASKS , 2014 .