Situation Assessment in Disaster Management

We present a framework for decision-making in relation to disaster management with a focus on situation assessment during disaster management monitoring. The use of causality reasoning based on the temporal evolution of a scenario provides a natural way to chain meaningful events and possible states of the system. There are usually different ways to analyse a problem and different strategies to follow as a solution and it is also often the case that information originating in different sources can be inconsistent or unreliable. Therefore we allow the specification of possibly conflicting situations as they are typical elements in disaster management. A decision procedure to decide on those conflicting situations is presented which not only provides a framework for the assistance of one decision-maker but also how to handle opinions from a hierarchy of decision-makers.

[1]  Guillermo R. Simari,et al.  Temporal Defeasible Reasoning , 2001, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[2]  J. Pollock Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person , 1995 .

[3]  Werner Dubitzky,et al.  A flexible and robust similarity measure based on contextual probability , 2005, IJCAI.

[4]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument , 1997 .

[5]  K. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[6]  Rob Sherwood,et al.  An autonomous Earth observing sensorweb , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[7]  Juan Carlos Augusto,et al.  Two Approaches to Event Definition , 2002, DEXA.

[8]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Computing Generalized Specificity , 2003, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[9]  T. Tideman,et al.  Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules , 1987 .

[10]  Juan Carlos Augusto,et al.  Using Ambient Intelligence for Disaster Management , 2006, KES.

[11]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Learning to Order Things , 1997, NIPS.

[12]  James L. Hein,et al.  Discrete structures, logic, and computability , 1994 .

[13]  John Fox,et al.  Safe and sound - artificial intelligence in hazardous applications , 2000 .

[14]  Ana Gabriela Maguitman,et al.  Logical models of argument , 2000, CSUR.

[15]  James F. Allen,et al.  TRIPS: An Integrated Intelligent Problem-Solving Assistant , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  Antony Galton Chapter 2 – Eventualities , 2005 .

[17]  Juan Carlos Augusto,et al.  Ambient Intelligence: The Confluence of Ubiquitous/Pervasive Computing and Artificial Intelligence , 2007 .

[18]  John P. Lewis,et al.  The DEFACTO System: Training Tool for Incident Commanders , 2005, AAAI.