Exploring Gender Biases with Virtual Patients for High Stakes Interpersonal Skills Training

The use of virtual characters in a variety of research areas is widespread. One such area is healthcare. The study presented in this paper leveraged virtual patients to examine whether virtual patients are more likely to be correctly diagnosed due to gender and skin tone. Medical students at the University of Florida College of Medicine interacted with six virtual patients across two sessions. The six virtual patients comprised various combinations of gender and skin tone. Each virtual patient presented with a different cranial nerve injury. The results indicate a significant difference in correct diagnosis according to patient gender for one of the cases. In that case, female patients were correctly diagnosed more frequently than their male counterpart. The description of that case required that the virtual patient present with a visible bruise on the forehead. We hypothesize the results obtained could be due to a transfer of a real world gender bias.

[1]  Brent Rossen,et al.  Virtual Humans Elicit Skin-Tone Bias Consistent with Real-World Skin-Tone Biases , 2008, IVA.

[2]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Virtual environment cultural training for operational readiness (VECTOR) , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[3]  Howard Waitzkin,et al.  Differences in clinical communication by gender , 1999, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  H. Waitzkin.  Information giving in medical care. , 1985, Journal of health and social behavior.

[5]  D. Tashkin,et al.  Gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD. , 2001, Chest.

[6]  M. van Ryn,et al.  Research on the Provider Contribution to Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Medical Care , 2002, Medical care.

[7]  Thomas S Inui,et al.  The associations of clinicians' implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[8]  Anton Leuski,et al.  Virtual Patients for Clinical Therapist Skills Training , 2007, IVA.

[9]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[10]  Steven Z. George,et al.  Pain assessment and treatment disparities: A virtual human technology investigation , 2009, Pain.

[11]  Jason G. Craggs,et al.  Virtual human technology: patient demographics and healthcare training factors in pain observation and treatment recommendations , 2010, Journal of pain research.

[12]  Adeline M. Deladisma,et al.  A pilot study to integrate an immersive virtual patient with a breast complaint and breast examination simulator into a surgery clerkship. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[13]  Kyle Johnsen,et al.  The validity of a virtual human experience for interpersonal skills education , 2007, CHI.

[14]  Etienne de Sevin,et al.  A Model of Personality and Emotional Traits , 2009, IVA.

[15]  Chris Barker,et al.  An Experimental Study on Fear of Public Speaking Using a Virtual Environment , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  Marianne S Matthias,et al.  The influence of patient sex, provider sex, and sexist attitudes on pain treatment decisions. , 2014, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[17]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Association of unconscious race and social class bias with vignette-based clinical assessments by medical students. , 2011, JAMA.

[18]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain , 2000 .

[19]  Max M. North,et al.  Brief Virtual Reality Therapy for Public Speaking Anxiety , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Can Immersive Virtual Humans Teach Social Conversational Protocols? , 2007, 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[21]  Himalaya Patel,et al.  Gender Differences in the Impact of Presentational Factors in Human Character Animation on Decisions in Ethical Dilemmas , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[22]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Xueni Pan,et al.  Socially Anxious and Confident Men Interact with a Forward Virtual Woman: An Experimental Study , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  M. Robinson,et al.  Virtual human technology: Capturing sex, race, and age influences in individual pain decision policies , 2008, PAIN.

[25]  Frederick P Rivara,et al.  Physician Implicit Attitudes and Stereotypes About Race and Quality of Medical Care , 2008, Medical care.

[26]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Can a virtual cat persuade you?: the role of gender and realism in speaker persuasiveness , 2006, CHI.