Invasion dynamics of Ponto‐Caspian amphipods leads to changes in invertebrate community structure and function

[1]  A. Laini,et al.  Among demons and killers: current and future potential distribution of two hyper successful invasive gammarids , 2023, Biological Invasions.

[2]  Longzhu Q. Shen,et al.  Tracking a killer shrimp: Dikerogammarus villosus invasion dynamics across Europe , 2022, Diversity and Distributions.

[3]  Ross N. Cuthbert,et al.  Advancing biological invasion hypothesis testing using functional diversity indices. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  D. Copilaș‐Ciocianu,et al.  Global distribution and diversity of alien Ponto-Caspian amphipods , 2021, bioRxiv.

[5]  A. Laini,et al.  Multiple co-occurrent alien invaders constrain aquatic biodiversity in rivers. , 2021, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  A. Laini,et al.  Invasive species influence macroinvertebrate biomonitoring tools and functional diversity in British rivers , 2020 .

[7]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050 , 2020, Global change biology.

[8]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  River Networks as Ecological Corridors , 2020 .

[9]  Ross N. Cuthbert,et al.  Salinity tolerance and geographical origin predict global alien amphipod invasions , 2020, Biology Letters.

[10]  J. Heino,et al.  Invasive crayfish alter the long‐term functional biodiversity of lotic macroinvertebrate communities , 2020, Functional Ecology.

[11]  B. Erisman,et al.  Does functional redundancy affect ecological stability and resilience? A review and meta‐analysis , 2020, Ecosphere.

[12]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Scientists' warning on invasive alien species , 2020, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  J. Trexler,et al.  Invasion impacts on functions and services of aquatic ecosystems , 2020, Hydrobiologia.

[14]  J. Olden,et al.  Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan , 2020, Bioscience.

[15]  D. Strayer,et al.  Need for routine tracking of biological invasions , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  J. Thioulouse Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data with ade4 , 2018 .

[17]  G. Grenouillet,et al.  Non-native species led to marked shifts in functional diversity of the world freshwater fish faunas. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[18]  S. Villéger,et al.  Functional diversity measures revealed impacts of non-native species and habitat degradation on species-poor freshwater fish assemblages. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  S. Lek,et al.  Biological invasions undermine the functional diversity of fish community in a large subtropical river , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[20]  P. Wood,et al.  Substrate preferences of coexisting invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus and Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, under field and laboratory conditions , 2018, Biological Invasions.

[21]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Depletion of Heterogeneous Source Species Pools Predicts Future Invasion Rates , 2017 .

[22]  Mike S. Fowler,et al.  Boom-bust dynamics in biological invasions: towards an improved application of the concept. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[23]  L. Gallien,et al.  The community ecology of invasive species: where are we and what's next? , 2017 .

[24]  W. Graf,et al.  Current velocity shapes co-existence patterns among invasive Dikerogammarus species , 2017 .

[25]  T. Kakareko,et al.  Zebra mussel beds: an effective feeding ground for Ponto-Caspian gobies or suitable shelter for their prey? , 2016, PeerJ.

[26]  J. Olden,et al.  Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities , 2016, Nature Communications.

[27]  J. Kobak,et al.  Conquerors or exiles? Impact of interference competition among invasive Ponto-Caspian gammarideans on their dispersal rates , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[28]  R. Gergs,et al.  Is Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea, Gammaridae) a ‘killer shrimp’ in the River Rhine system? , 2016, Hydrobiologia.

[29]  Ł. Jermacz,et al.  Substratum preferences of the invasive killer shrimp Dikerogammarus villosus , 2015 .

[30]  T. Kakareko,et al.  The art of choice: predation risk changes interspecific competition between freshwater amphipods , 2015 .

[31]  B. Gallardo,et al.  Is Great Britain heading for a Ponto–Caspian invasional meltdown? , 2015 .

[32]  Helene C. Bovy,et al.  Predicting the predatory impacts of the “demon shrimp” Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, on native and previously introduced species , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[33]  T. Rewicz,et al.  The profile of a 'perfect' invader - the case of killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus , 2014 .

[34]  J. Dick,et al.  Physicochemical tolerance, habitat use and predation are drivers of patterns of coexistence and exclusion among invasive and resident amphipods. , 2014 .

[35]  Leandro da Silva Duarte,et al.  Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities , 2013 .

[36]  M. Jackson,et al.  Accelerating rates of freshwater invasions in the catchment of the River Thames , 2013, Biological Invasions.

[37]  T. Kakareko,et al.  The impact of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) periostracum and biofilm cues on habitat selection by a Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus haemobaphes , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  Miquel De Cáceres,et al.  Using species combinations in indicator value analyses , 2012 .

[39]  Kelly A. Carscadden,et al.  Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services , 2011 .

[40]  F. Gherardi,et al.  Invasive alien Crustacea: dispersal, establishment, impact and control , 2011, BioControl.

[41]  J. Dick,et al.  The Ponto-Caspian ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), invades the British Isles , 2010 .

[42]  M. Polačik,et al.  Invasive gobies in the Danube: invasion success facilitated by availability and selection of superior food resources , 2009 .

[43]  M. Pöckl Success of the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus by life history traits and reproductive capacity , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[44]  J. Dick,et al.  Invader–invader interactions in relation to environmental heterogeneity leads to zonation of two invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky) and Gammarus tigrinus Sexton: amphipod pilot species project (AMPIS) report 6 , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[45]  G. Velde,et al.  Interference competition between alien invasive gammaridean species , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[46]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[47]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[48]  M. Grabowski,et al.  How to be an invasive gammarid (Amphipoda: Gammaroidea)–comparison of life history traits , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[49]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? , 2006, Ecology letters.

[50]  M. V. Vander Zanden,et al.  Do Reservoirs Facilitate Invasions into Landscapes? , 2005 .

[51]  G. Maier,et al.  An example of niche partitioning between Dikerogammarus villosus and other invasive and native gammarids: a field study , 2005 .

[52]  M. Loreau Does functional redundancy exist , 2004 .

[53]  B. Statzner,et al.  Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of alternative metrics , 2003 .

[54]  A. Stoeckmann Physiological energetics of Lake Erie dreissenid mussels: a basis for the displacement of Dreissena polymorpha by Dreissena bugensis , 2003 .

[55]  J. Dick,et al.  Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea : Amphipoda) , 2002 .

[56]  A. Ricciardi Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an "invasional meltdown" occurring in the Great Lakes? , 2001 .

[57]  J. Dick,et al.  Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown? , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[59]  R. Elwood,et al.  THE TROPHIC ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER GAMMARUS SPP. (CRUSTACEA:AMPHIPODA): PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES CONCERNING THE FUNCTIONAL FEEDING GROUP CONCEPT , 1997 .

[60]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[61]  Daniel Chessel,et al.  A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data , 1994 .

[62]  T. Johns,et al.  What drives non-native amphipod distributions in the River Thames? The role of habitat and human activity on species abundance , 2017 .

[63]  P. Goethals,et al.  Potential effects of the invasive 'killer shrimp' (Dikerogammarus villosus) on macroinvertebrate assemblages and biomonitoring indices , 2013 .

[64]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[65]  V. Hermoso,et al.  Reservoirs promote the taxonomic homogenization of fish communities within river basins , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[66]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Now you See them, Now you don't! – Population Crashes of Established Introduced Species , 2004, Biological Invasions.