What determines the ultimate resolution? The critical relationship between exposure tools and photoresists
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yasuhiro Kishikawa | Yuichi Iwasaki | Miyoko Kawashima | Akinori Ohkubo | Minoru Yoshii | Tokuyuki Honda
[1] Roger H. French,et al. Imaging of 32-nm 1:1 lines and spaces using 193-nm immersion interference lithography with second-generation immersion fluids to achieve a numerical aperture of 1.5 and a k[sub 1] of 0.25 , 2005 .
[2] Vivek M. Prabhu,et al. Resolution limitations in chemically amplified photoresist systems , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[3] Augustus J. E. M. Janssen,et al. Determination of resist parameters using the extended Nijboer-Zernike theory , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[4] J A Hoffnagle,et al. Method of measuring the spatial resolution of a photoresist. , 2002, Optics letters.
[5] Andreas Grassmann,et al. Contrast transfer function measurements of deep ultraviolet steppers , 1992 .
[6] Hiroshi Ito,et al. Chemical amplification resists: History and development within IBM , 1997, IBM J. Res. Dev..
[7] Carlos Fonseca,et al. Impact of resist blur on MEF, OPC, and CD control , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[8] Costas J. Spanos,et al. Resist-based measurement of the contrast transfer function in a 0.3-NA EUV microfield optic , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[9] Yong Wang,et al. Material design for immersion lithography with high refractive index fluid (HIF) , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.