Creating Social Change Out of Nothing: The Role of Entrepreneurial Bricolage in Social Entrepreneurs' Catalytic Innovations

Social entrepreneurship is primarily concerned with the development of innovative solutions to society's most challenging problems. Since social entrepreneurship flourishes in resource-constrained environments, social innovation may depend on the extent to which social entrepreneurs can combine and apply the resources at hand in creative and useful ways to solve problems – “bricolage.” Moreover, innovating for social impact relies on a set of institutional and structural supports – “innovation ecology,' which can facilitate or impede innovation. Our research empirically examines these variables as drivers of systemic social change through scaling and replication – “catalytic innovation” (i.e., the development of products and services targeted to unserved markets). Results of a survey conducted with 113 social entrepreneurs indicate that, while innovation ecology is associated with the degree of catalytic innovation, it is mediated by the role and degree of bricolage that social entrepreneurs bring to solving problems. These findings reinforce the role of entrepreneurs as the indispensable agents of social change.

[1]  R. Miettinen,et al.  Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change , 2005 .

[2]  Andrew C. Corbett,et al.  Proclivity for Improvisation as a Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions , 2006 .

[3]  Raymond Dart,et al.  The legitimacy of social enterprise , 2004 .

[4]  M. Bhave A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation , 1994 .

[5]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[6]  T. Baker,et al.  Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage , 2005 .

[7]  J. Mair,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight , 2006 .

[8]  Lisa K. Gundry,et al.  Innovation ecology as a precursor to entrepreneurial growth , 2009 .

[9]  Paul Tracey,et al.  The Dialectic of Social Exchange: Theorizing Corporate—Social Enterprise Collaboration , 2009 .

[10]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  T. Lawrence,et al.  The Impact of Virtual Embeddedness on New Venture Survival: Overcoming the Liabilities of Newness 1 , 2007 .

[12]  Donald O. Neubaum,et al.  A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, search Processes and Ethical Challenges , 2009 .

[13]  Leo A. Aroian,et al.  The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. , 1947 .

[14]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures. , 1995, Multivariate behavioral research.

[15]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[16]  Alex Nicholls,et al.  'We do good things, don't we?': 'Blended Value Accounting' in social entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[17]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[18]  Marialaura Di Domenico,et al.  Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises , 2010 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Devendra Potnis,et al.  Catalytic Innovation in Microfinance for Inclusive Growth: Insights from SKS Microfinance , 2010 .

[21]  W. Wulf Changes in Innovation Ecology , 2007, Science.

[22]  H. Stevenson,et al.  Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? , 2006 .

[23]  Todd W. Moss,et al.  Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities , 2009 .

[24]  S. Sarasvathy Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency , 2001 .

[25]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process , 2003 .

[26]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[28]  C. Ciborra The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .

[29]  Connecting the Dots in Social Entrepreneurship through the Capabilities Approach , 2008 .