The discovery by Hata et al. of “super-long” carbon nanotubes (CNTs) grown by catalyst-driven, water-assisted chemical vapor deposition represented a major synthetic breakthrough for the integration of CNTs into future device architectures, such as chemical and physical sensors, heterogeneous catalyst arrays, or 3D microand nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS and NEMS). Their work was preceded by the development of the HiPCO process by Smalley et al. , which allowed, for the first time, a massive formation of unordered singlewalled CNTs (SWCNTs). This discovery was followed shortly thereafter by the first growth process of long (up to 4 mm) vertically aligned SWCNTs by Muruyama et al. Recently, Hata et al. found that CO2, ethers, ketones, and alcohols are, in the same way as water, advantageous for the growth of arranged “super-long” CNTs. All growth enhancers contain oxygen atoms, and act as weak oxidants, which are able to etch away a growing carbon layer, which deactivates the active catalyst, and thus being detrimental to the growth of “superlong” CNTs. 6] The composition of the active catalyst in the “super-long” growth of CNTs needs further investigation, despite experimental efforts in the field of in situ characterization of CNT growth. Herein we report our findings regarding the nature, role, and mechanism of the catalyst composition in the growth of “super-long” CNTs. Our studies allow an understanding of the morphology and structure of the catalyst nanoparticles by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) tomograms and of their chemical composition by a combination of spectroscopic and diffraction techniques. Besides catalyst dispersion, the properties of the substrate surface (roughness, active area, and electron-transfer ability to the catalyst surface) are critical for a high-yielding efficient CNT growth. Aluminum is known to work as an efficient buffer layer between catalyst and substrate under “super-long” CNT growth conditions. CNT growth starts with deposition of iron metal particles on a thin aluminum metal film deposited onto a Si wafer having a thin native SiO2 layer. [1] We have chosen two different procedures for catalyst sample preparation, which allow direct observation of the catalyst’s structure and morphology and characterization of its chemical composition. The first set of experiments was carried out on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids and the second on a Si wafer substrate. In both cases we deposited a 10 nm-thick aluminum film, followed by a 1 nm-thick layer of iron metal. These deposited films were then heated directly to 750 8C. The resulting catalysts were then tested and found to be active in the water assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth of CNTs in an independent set of experiments (for details and characterization of the CNTs, see the Supporting Information). The chemical composition of the catalyst system was further studied to clarify whether (a) FexAly intermetallic compound formation or (b) Fe–Al particle formation by cluster intermixing of aluminum and iron elements occurs under growth conditions. The latter are typically nonequilibrium structures, and thermal treatment and surrounding conditions may strongly influence their catalytic behavior. To confirm the shape and particle morphology of the Fe–Al nanocatalyst, firstly high-angle annular dark-field STEM images were recorded (Figure 1 A). The particles exhibit a core–shell contrast with facets. Their size ranges from a few nanometers up to 50 nm and the particles show sharp corners and edges with flat surface structures. Lattice fringes are observed, offering proof of the crystalline nature of the catalyst particles. High-resolution bright-field tomography of these particles was undertaken to clarify their three-dimensional shape. The tomogram data of the catalyst particles reveal a dome-shaped morphology with a void within the core, hence the donut-like contrast in the projection images. A tomogram slice showing the central void and well-defined facets is shown in Figure 1 B. Spatially resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) was performed in a high-resolution STEM to study the element distribution within the catalyst particles (Figure 1 C). Line profiles of 20 EEL spectra were taken across a number of catalyst particles. The evaluation of core-loss signals in the spectra allows plotting of the intensity of Fe and Al concentrations across the particle’s diameter. As can be seen from Figure 1 C, [a] R. Joshi, Dr. J. Engstler, Prof. Dr. J. J. Schneider Technische Universit t Darmstadt, Fachbereich Chemie Eduard-Zintl-Institut f r Anorganische und Physikalische Chemie Petersenstrasse 18, 64287 Darmstadt (Germany) Fax: (+ 49) 6151-163470 E-mail : joerg.schneider@ac.chemie.tu-darmstadt.de [b] Dr. L. Houben, Dr. M. Bar Sadan Ernst-Ruska-Zentrum f r Elektronenmikroskopie (ER-C) 52425 J lich (Germany) [c] Prof. Dr. A. Weidenkaff, Dr. P. Mandaliev Eidgençssische Material-Pr fungsanstalt, EMPA 8600 D bendorf (Switzerland) [d] Dr. A. Issanin Technische Universit t Darmstadt Fachbereich Materialund Geowissenschaften Fachgebiet Oberfl chenforschung Petersenstrasse 23, 64287 Darmstadt (Germany) Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000037.
[1]
A. Pasquarello,et al.
Carbon diffusion in CVD growth of carbon nanotubes on metal nanoparticles
,
2008
.
[2]
R. L. Wal,et al.
Substrate–support interactions in metal-catalyzed carbon nanofiber growth
,
2001
.
[3]
L. M. Foster,et al.
Reactions Between Aluminum Oxide and Carbon The Al2O3—Al4C3 Phase Diagram
,
1956
.
[4]
O. Kuznetsov,et al.
Thermodynamics behind carbon nanotube growth via endothermic catalytic decomposition reaction.
,
2009,
ACS nano.
[5]
D. Pavlidis,et al.
Patterned growth of ultra long carbon nanotubes. Properties and systematic investigation into their growth process
,
2010
.
[6]
K. Ernst,et al.
XPS study of the a-C:H/Al2O3 interface
,
1994
.
[7]
J. Joubert,et al.
Synthese de nouvelles phases denses d'oxyhydroxydes M3+OOH des metaux de la premiere serie de transition, en milieu hydrothermal à tres haute pression
,
1973
.
[8]
V. Shustov,et al.
CVD growth of carbon nanotube films on nickel substrates
,
2003
.
[9]
M. Roukes,et al.
A self-sustaining ultrahigh-frequency nanoelectromechanical oscillator.
,
2008,
Nature nanotechnology.
[10]
C. Hierold,et al.
Micromachined pressure sensors for electromechanical characterization of carbon nanotubes
,
2006
.
[11]
E. Sacher,et al.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of the evaporated aluminum/corona-treated polyethylene terephthalate interface
,
1998
.
[12]
P. Oelhafen,et al.
The Influence of Catalyst Chemical State and Morphology on Carbon Nanotube Growth
,
2004
.
[13]
G. Duesberg,et al.
Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes at 600 °C and a Simple Growth Model
,
2004
.
[14]
N. S. McIntyre,et al.
Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds
,
2004
.
[15]
J. Robertson,et al.
Diffusion- and reaction-limited growth of carbon nanotube forests.
,
2009,
ACS nano.
[16]
J. Ting,et al.
Growth of CNTs on Fe–Si catalyst prepared on Si and Al coated Si substrates
,
2008,
Nanotechnology.
[17]
Changhong Liu,et al.
Aligned Carbon Nanotube Composite Films for Thermal Management
,
2005
.
[18]
B. M. Dekoven,et al.
XPS studies of metal/polymer interfaces — Thin films of Al on polyacrylic acid and polyethylene
,
1986
.
[19]
C. Domingo,et al.
Strong influence of buffer layer type on carbon nanotube characteristics
,
2004
.
[20]
Shiv N. Khanna,et al.
Complementary Active Sites Cause Size-Selective Reactivity of Aluminum Cluster Anions with Water
,
2009,
Science.
[21]
Alan M. Cassell,et al.
Controlled Chemical Routes to Nanotube Architectures, Physics, and Devices
,
1999
.
[22]
A. Sharma,et al.
Temperature induced structural changes at interfaces and their influence on magnetic and electronic properties of ultrathin Fe/Al structures
,
2006
.
[23]
Masahiro Horibe,et al.
Electrical Properties of Carbon Nanotube Bundles for Future Via Interconnects
,
2005
.
[24]
John Robertson,et al.
State of Transition Metal Catalysts During Carbon Nanotube Growth
,
2009
.
[25]
J. M. Martín,et al.
Chemistry of the interface between aluminium and polyethyleneterephthalate by XPS
,
1991
.
[26]
K. Hata,et al.
Water-Assisted Highly Efficient Synthesis of Impurity-Free Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
,
2004,
Science.
[27]
Kenneth A. Smith,et al.
Gas-phase catalytic growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes from carbon monoxide
,
1999
.
[28]
Cary L. Pint,et al.
Evolution in Catalyst Morphology Leads to Carbon Nanotube Growth Termination
,
2010
.
[29]
Masamichi Kohno,et al.
Low-temperature synthesis of high-purity single-walled carbon nanotubes from alcohol
,
2002
.
[30]
T. Barr.
An ESCA study of the termination of the passivation of elemental metals
,
1978
.
[31]
P. Ajayan,et al.
Substrate effects on the growth of carbon nanotubes by thermal decomposition of methane
,
2003
.
[32]
J. Hazemann,et al.
Rietveld Studies of the Aluminium-Iron Substitution in Synthetic Goethite
,
1991
.
[33]
Takeo Yamada,et al.
Revealing the secret of water-assisted carbon nanotube synthesis by microscopic observation of the interaction of water on the catalysts.
,
2008,
Nano letters.