Exploiting Semantics for Constructing and Comparing Occupational and Educational-driven Qualifications: the TIPTOE Project

In recent years, mobility of students and workers started to be consid- ered as a way for answering skill shortages in the European labor world. However, in order to implement effective mobility practices, suitable instruments supporting trans- parency and readability of the outcomes of learning processes as well as of the needs of companies and employers in general have to be developed. In fact, though some instru- ments have been introduced (like, for instance, the European Qualification Framework, EQF, the European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training, ECVET, etc.), they are often seen as theoretical tools rather than a practical help for involved stakeholders. In this work, the results of the TIPTOE project, a transnational ini- tiative funded by the European Commission under the Lifelong Learning Programme are illustrated. In particular, the semantic-based methodology for the construction of a European-wide profile mixing education and labor worlds perspectives in the trade sector is discussed. Furthermore, a number of tools allowing end-users to compare owned qualifications to the reference one and supporting stakeholders in the reading of national educational and occupational profiles in the EQF dimension are presented.

[1]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Ontology-based concept map for planning personalized learning path , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems.

[2]  Fabrizio Lamberti,et al.  An Automatic Tool Supporting Life-long Learning Based on a Semantic-Oriented Approach for Comparing Qualifications , 2009 .

[3]  Richard Hackelbusch Handling Heterogeneous Academic Curricula , 2006, 17th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'06).

[4]  G. Nemirovskij,et al.  SWAPS: Semantic Web Approach for Personalisation of Study , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[5]  J. Puustjarvi,et al.  CUBER: a personalised curriculum builder , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[6]  Joseph Sant,et al.  Curriculum Management and Review: an ontology-based solution. , 2007 .

[7]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  M. Hoffmann,et al.  Using Bloom’s Taxonomy of learning to make engineering courses comparable , 2008, 2008 19th EAEEIE Annual Conference.

[10]  Juha Puustjärvi,et al.  The role of metadata in the CUBER system , 2002 .

[11]  Tommaso Di Noia,et al.  A Semantic Web Enabled System for Résumé Composition and Publication , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[12]  Adelina Tang An ontological approach to curriculum development , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED).

[13]  Hilary Dexter,et al.  An Ontology-Based Curriculum Knowledgebase for Managing Complexity and Change , 2009, 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[14]  J.C. Ferreira,et al.  Academic Ontology to support the Bologna Mobility Process , 2009, 2009 2nd International Conference on Adaptive Science & Technology (ICAST).

[15]  Barbara Pernici,et al.  The eCCO System: An eCompetence Management Tool Based on Semantic Networks , 2006, OTM Workshops.