According to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it is clear that the buildings sector presents the biggest potential for deep and fast CO2 emission reductions on a cost-effective basis. Interestingly, this assessment was premised exclusively on technical (engineering) measures, but ignored completely the behavioural and lifestyle dimensions of energy consumption in the buildings sector. Behavioural change in buildings, however, can deliver even faster and zero-cost improvements in energy efficiency and greenhouse gas (ghg) emission reductions. With this in mind, designers are beginning to shift their attention to how they can widen the range of opportunities available in a building to provide comfort for the occupants, both in new-build and retrofit contexts. This in turn has re-awakened an interest in the role of natural ventilation in the provision of comfort. This discussion about adaptive comfort raises several questions, including the following: How can we shift occupants' comfort expectations away from the static indoor climates of the past towards the more variable thermal regimes found in naturally ventilated buildings? Are building occupants ‘addicted’ to static environments, i.e. air-conditioning (AC)? If so, how tolerant or compliant will they be when the thermally constant conditions provided by AC are replaced by the thermally variable conditions that characterize naturally ventilated spaces? Does the frequency of prior exposure to AC bias building occupants' thermal expectations and, if so, what are the implications of this bias for their acceptance of naturally ventilated indoor climates? Does prior exposure to AC lead building occupants to actually prefer AC over natural ventilation? This article addresses these questions in the context of a large field study of building occupants in a hot and humid climate zone in Brazil (Maceio). The temperature preferences registered on 975 questionnaires in naturally ventilated buildings are statistically analysed in relation to occupants' prior exposure to AC in their workplaces.
[1]
Richard de Dear,et al.
The Theory of Thermal Comfort in Naturally Ventilated Indoor Environments - “The Pleasure Principle”
,
2009
.
[2]
Chungyoon Chun,et al.
Thermal diary : Connecting temperature history to indoor comfort
,
2008
.
[3]
Gail Brager,et al.
Air movement preferences observed in office buildings
,
2007,
International journal of biometeorology.
[4]
J. Toftum,et al.
Air movement--good or bad?
,
2004,
Indoor air.
[5]
Gail Brager,et al.
Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55
,
2002
.
[6]
M. Cabanac.
Physiological Role of Pleasure
,
1971,
Science.
[7]
R. Dear,et al.
Air movement acceptability limits and thermal comfort in Brazil's hot humid climate zone
,
2010
.
[8]
Edward Arens,et al.
Indoor Environmental Quality ( IEQ ) Title Are ' Class A ' temperature requirements realistic or desirable ?
,
2009
.
[9]
Pushpam Kumar.
Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
,
2007
.
[10]
A. Auliciems,et al.
Airconditioning in Australia II—User Attitudes
,
1988
.