Bioactive Conformational Biasing: A New Method for Focusing Conformational Ensembles on Bioactive-Like Conformers

Computational approaches that rely on ligand-based information for lead discovery and optimization are often required to spend considerable resources analyzing compounds with large conformational ensembles. In order to reduce such efforts, we have developed a new filtration tool which reduces the total number of ligand conformations while retaining in the final set a reasonable number of conformations that are similar (rmsd < or = 1 A) to those observed in ligand-protein cocrystals (bioactive-like conformations). Our tool consists of the following steps: (1) Prefiltration aimed at removing ligands for which the probability of finding bioactive-like conformations is low. (2) Filtration based on a unique combination of two-/three-dimensional ligand properties. Within this paradigm, a filtration model is defined by its workflow and by the identity of the specific descriptors used for filtration. Thus, we developed multiple models based on a training set of 47 drug compounds and tested their performance on an independent test set of 24 drug compounds. For test set compounds after prefiltration, our best models have a success rate of approximately 80% and were able to reduce the total number of conformations by 36% while maintaining a sufficiently large number of bioactive-like conformations and slightly increasing their proportion in the filtered ensemble. We were also able to reduce by 39% the number of conformations that are remote (rmsd > 2.5 A) from the bioactive conformer (nonbioactive conformations). In accord with previous reports, prefiltration is shown to have a major effect on model performance. The role and performance of specific descriptors as filters is discussed in some detail, and future directions are proposed.

[1]  A. Good,et al.  Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[2]  Kenneth M. Merz,et al.  Can we separate active from inactive conformations? , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  Christian Senger,et al.  Representation of target-bound drugs by computed conformers: implications for conformational libraries , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  P. Charifson,et al.  Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Jacques Chomilier,et al.  Frog: a FRee Online druG 3D conformation generator , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Eric J. Martin,et al.  Conformational Sampling of Bioactive Molecules: A Comparative Study , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  J. Thornton,et al.  Conformational diversity of ligands bound to proteins. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Christof H. Schwab,et al.  Conformational Analysis and Searching , 2008 .

[10]  Osman F Güner,et al.  History and evolution of the pharmacophore concept in computer-aided drug design. , 2002, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Anshuman Dixit,et al.  Computer-Aided Drug Design: Integration of Structure-Based and Ligand-Based Approaches in Drug Design , 2007 .

[12]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Detailed analysis of grid‐based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm‐based MD docking algorithm , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Thierry Langer,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Protein‐Bound Ligand Conformations with Respect to Catalyst′s Conformational Space Subsampling Algorithms. , 2005 .

[14]  Dimitris K. Agrafiotis,et al.  A distance geometry heuristic for expanding the range of geometries sampled during conformational search , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  G. Oliva,et al.  Virtual screening and its integration with modern drug design technologies. , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Natasja Brooijmans,et al.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[17]  Evan Bolton,et al.  Assessment of Conformational Ensemble Sizes Necessary for Specific Resolutions of Coverage of Conformational Space , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[19]  Mathias Dunkel,et al.  SuperLigands – a database of ligand structures derived from the Protein Data Bank , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Paul D Lyne,et al.  Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[21]  A E Howard,et al.  An analysis of current methodologies for conformational searching of complex molecules. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Hugues-Olivier Bertrand,et al.  Are You Sure You Have a Good Model , 2006 .

[23]  Andrew Smellie,et al.  Poling: Promoting conformational variation , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[24]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[25]  Max Dobler,et al.  5D-QSAR: the key for simulating induced fit? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  Nicolas Foloppe,et al.  Conformational Sampling of Druglike Molecules with MOE and Catalyst: Implications for Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: A critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[28]  G. Chang,et al.  Macromodel—an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanics , 1990 .

[29]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.

[30]  M Rarey,et al.  Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  G. Chang,et al.  An internal-coordinate Monte Carlo method for searching conformational space , 1989 .

[32]  A. Leach A Survey of Methods for Searching the Conformational Space of Small and Medium‐Sized Molecules , 1992 .