Mapping Mineral Prospectivity via Semi-supervised Random Forest

The majority of machine learning algorithms that have been applied in data-driven predictive mapping of mineral prospectivity require a sufficient number of training samples (known mineral deposits) to obtain results with high performance and reliability. Semi-supervised learning can take advantage of the huge amount of unlabeled data to benefit the supervised learning tasks and hence provide a suitable scheme for mapping mineral prospectivity in cases where only few known mineral deposits are available. Semi-supervised random forest was used in this study to map mineral prospectivity in the southwestern Fujian metallogenic belt of China, where there is still excellent potential for mineral exploration due to the large proportion of areas covered by forest. The findings obtained from the current study include: (1) semi-supervised learning can make use of both the labeled and unlabeled samples to help improve the performance of mapping mineral prospectivity; (2) multi-dimensional scaling can be used to explore the clustering structure within the samples, which provides a tool to validate the usability of semi-supervised learning algorithms. In addition, the prospectivity map obtained in this study can be used to guide further mineral exploration in the southwestern Fujian of China.

[1]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  Semi-supervised classification of hyperspectral image using random forest algorithm , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[2]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Manifold Regularization: A Geometric Framework for Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Examples , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  J. Caers.  Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences: Caers/Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences , 2011 .

[4]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Semi-Supervised Graph-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Qiuming Cheng,et al.  BoostWofE: A New Sequential Weights of Evidence Model Reducing the Effect of Conditional Dependency , 2015, Mathematical Geosciences.

[6]  Yang Zu.  SHRIMP zircon U-Pb dating of quartz porphyry from Zhongjia tin-polymetallic deposit in Longyan area, Fujian Province, and its geological significance , 2008 .

[7]  Jef Caers,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences , 2011 .

[8]  David I. Groves,et al.  Combined conceptual/empirical prospectivity mapping for orogenic gold in the northern Fennoscandian Shield, Finland , 2008 .

[9]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[10]  Eldad Haber,et al.  Data mining for real mining: A robust algorithm for prospectivity mapping with uncertainties , 2015, SDM.

[11]  Mahyar Yousefi,et al.  Fuzzification of continuous-value spatial evidence for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  Q. Cheng,et al.  Integrated Spatial and Spectrum Method for Geochemical Anomaly Separation , 2000 .

[13]  R. Zuo,et al.  Big Data Analytics of Identifying Geochemical Anomalies Supported by Machine Learning Methods , 2017, Natural Resources Research.

[14]  E. Carranza,et al.  Data-Driven Predictive Modeling of Mineral Prospectivity Using Random Forests: A Case Study in Catanduanes Island (Philippines) , 2016, Natural Resources Research.

[15]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[16]  Q. Cheng,et al.  Characterization and origin of granites from the Luoyang Fe deposit, southwestern Fujian Province, South China , 2018 .

[17]  Qiuming Cheng,et al.  Spatial characteristics of geochemical patterns related to Fe mineralization in the southwestern Fujian province (China) , 2015 .

[18]  F. Agterberg,et al.  Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential , 1990 .

[19]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Semi-Supervised Random Forests , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[20]  Tom Gedeon,et al.  Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2000 .

[21]  Q. Cheng.  Mapping singularities with stream sediment geochemical data for prediction of undiscovered mineral deposits in Gejiu, Yunnan Province, China , 2007 .

[22]  K. Rose.  Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[23]  Qiuming Cheng,et al.  Singularity theory and methods for mapping geochemical anomalies caused by buried sources and for predicting undiscovered mineral deposits in covered areas , 2012 .

[24]  Abbas Bahroudi,et al.  Support vector machine for multi-classification of mineral prospectivity areas , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Natural Resources Research Publications on Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Potential Mapping, and Introduction to the Special Issue of Papers in These Fields , 2017, Natural Resources Research.

[26]  G. Bonham-Carter.  Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS , 1995 .

[27]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  GIS-based rare events logistic regression for mineral prospectivity mapping , 2018, Comput. Geosci..

[28]  T. McCuaig,et al.  Translating the mineral systems approach into an effective exploration targeting system , 2010 .

[29]  V. Rodriguez-Galiano,et al.  Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines , 2015 .

[30]  Mao Jian.  The Mesozoic rock-forming and ore-forming processes and tectonic environment evolution in Shanghang-Datian region, Fujian. , 2004 .

[31]  Maysam Abedi,et al.  Clustering of mineral prospectivity area as an unsupervised classification approach to explore copper deposit , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[32]  F. Agterberg.  Computer programs for mineral exploration. , 1989, Science.

[33]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  Support vector machine: A tool for mapping mineral prospectivity , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[34]  Alexander Zien,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning , 2006 .

[35]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  Mapping geochemical anomalies related to Fe–polymetallic mineralization using the maximum margin metric learning method , 2019, Ore Geology Reviews.

[36]  Shinichi Nakajima,et al.  Porosity estimation by semi-supervised learning with sparsely available labeled samples , 2017, Comput. Geosci..

[37]  E. Carranza,et al.  Geologically Constrained Fuzzy Mapping of Gold Mineralization Potential, Baguio District, Philippines , 2001 .

[38]  R. Zuo,et al.  A comparative study of fuzzy weights of evidence and random forests for mapping mineral prospectivity for skarn-type Fe deposits in the southwestern Fujian metallogenic belt, China , 2016, Science China Earth Sciences.

[39]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  The effect of unlabeled samples in reducing the small sample size problem and mitigating the Hughes phenomenon , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[40]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Introduction to Semi-Supervised Learning , 2009, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

[41]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  Sr–Nd–Pb isotope systematics of magnetite: Implications for the genesis of Makeng Fe deposit, southern China , 2014 .

[42]  Forrest W. Young.  Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory, and Applications , 1987 .

[43]  E. Carranza.  Weights of Evidence Modeling of Mineral Potential: A Case Study Using Small Number of Prospects, Abra, Philippines , 2004 .

[44]  Q. Cheng,et al.  The use of evidential belief functions for mineral potential mapping in the Nanling belt, South China , 2015, Frontiers of Earth Science.

[45]  Horst Bischof,et al.  SERBoost: Semi-supervised Boosting with Expectation Regularization , 2008, ECCV.

[46]  Jian Wang,et al.  Deep learning and its application in geochemical mapping , 2019, Earth-Science Reviews.

[47]  Qiuming Cheng,et al.  The mineralization age of the Makeng Fe deposit, South China: implications from U–Pb and Sm–Nd geochronology , 2015, International Journal of Earth Sciences.

[48]  Yue Liu,et al.  Mineral prospectivity mapping integrating multi-source geology spatial data sets and logistic regression modelling , 2011, Proceedings 2011 IEEE International Conference on Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services.

[49]  Zhang Cheng.  Zircon U-Pb age and Nd-Sr-Pb isotopic characteristics of Dayang-Juzhou granite in Longyan,Fujian Province and its geological significanc , 2012 .

[50]  M. Yousefi,et al.  Data-driven logistic-based weighting of geochemical and geological evidence layers in mineral prospectivity mapping , 2016 .

[51]  E. Carranza,et al.  Data-driven predictive mapping of gold prospectivity, Baguio district, Philippines: Application of Random Forests algorithm , 2015 .

[52]  Radford M. Neal.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[53]  R. Zuo,et al.  Effects of misclassification costs on mapping mineral prospectivity , 2017 .

[54]  Q. Cheng,et al.  Fuzzy Weights of Evidence Method and Its Application in Mineral Potential Mapping , 1999 .

[55]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Data-Driven Index Overlay and Boolean Logic Mineral Prospectivity Modeling in Greenfields Exploration , 2016, Natural Resources Research.

[56]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[57]  J. Chen,et al.  Geology and fluid inclusion geochemistry of the Zijinshan high-sulfidation epithermal Cu-Au deposit, Fujian Province, SE China: Implication for deep exploration targeting , 2018 .

[58]  Hooshang H. Asadi,et al.  Application of semi-supervised fuzzy c-means method in clustering multivariate geochemical data, a case study from the Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit in central Iran , 2017 .

[59]  Na Ren,et al.  An improved logistic regression model based on a spatially weighted technique (ILRBSWT v1.0) and its application to mineral prospectivity mapping , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[60]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  Mapping Geochemical Anomalies Through Integrating Random Forest and Metric Learning Methods , 2019, Natural Resources Research.

[61]  R. Zuo,et al.  Recognizing geochemical anomalies via stochastic simulation-based local singularity analysis , 2019, Journal of Geochemical Exploration.

[62]  Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2003 .

[63]  C. H. James.  Geochemical mapping , 1979, Nature.

[64]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Random forest predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity with small number of prospects and data with missing values in Abra (Philippines) , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[65]  E. Carranza,et al.  Evaluation of uncertainty in mineral prospectivity mapping due to missing evidence: A case study with skarn-type Fe deposits in Southwestern Fujian Province, China , 2015 .

[66]  E. Carranza,et al.  Weighted drainage catchment basin mapping of geochemical anomalies using stream sediment data for mineral potential modeling , 2013 .

[67]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Transductive Inference for Text Classification using Support Vector Machines , 1999, ICML.

[68]  M. Fatehi,et al.  Data integration modeling applied to drill hole planning through semi-supervised learning: A case study from the Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit in the central Iran , 2017 .

[69]  J. Harris,et al.  Comparison of the Data-Driven Random Forests Model and a Knowledge-Driven Method for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping: A Case Study for Gold Deposits Around the Huritz Group and Nueltin Suite, Nunavut, Canada , 2016, Natural Resources Research.

[70]  E. Carranza,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: GIS-based mineral potential modelling and geological data analyses for mineral exploration , 2015 .

[71]  E. Carranza,et al.  A Hybrid Fuzzy Weights-of-Evidence Model for Mineral Potential Mapping , 2006 .

[72]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  A comparative study of trend surface analysis and spectrum–area multifractal model to identify geochemical anomalies , 2015 .

[73]  Xie Xuejing,et al.  Geochemical mapping in China , 1997 .

[74]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Semi-supervised Learning by Entropy Minimization , 2004, CAP.

[75]  Renguang Zuo,et al.  Recognition of geochemical anomalies using a deep autoencoder network , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[76]  Mahyar Yousefi,et al.  Prediction-area (P-A) plot and C-A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[77]  David Yarowsky,et al.  Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation Rivaling Supervised Methods , 1995, ACL.

[78]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Data using Graph Mincuts , 2001, ICML.

[79]  E. Carranza.  Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in Gis , 2012 .

[80]  E. Carranza,et al.  Evidential belief functions for data-driven geologically constrained mapping of gold potential, Baguio district, Philippines , 2003 .

[81]  Avrim Blum,et al.  The Bottleneck , 2021, Monopsony Capitalism.

[82]  R. Zuo,et al.  Mapping mineral prospectivity for Cu polymetallic mineralization in southwest Fujian Province, China , 2016 .

[83]  Michel Faure,et al.  Geochronological and geochemical features of the Cathaysia block (South China): New evidence for the Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia , 2011 .

[84]  M. Hale,et al.  Bayesian network classifiers for mineral potential mapping , 2006, Comput. Geosci..