Creating and Capturing Value in Repeated Exchange Relationships: Managing a Second Paradox of Embeddedness

Prior empirical studies suggest repeated exchange develops increasing value in buyer-supplier relationships. A first order implication of this finding is that buyers will focus exchange to generate maximum value in relationships. However, buyers are equally concerned with value capture. By distributing rather than focusing exchange, buyers may position themselves to capture more of the value created, leaving buyers potentially conflicted concerning the choice. We label this dynamic the second paradox of embeddedness, distinguishing it from Uzzi’s (1997) paradox driven by technological uncertainty. By examining the procurement activities of a large, diversified manufacturing company, we then test for supplier and buyer behavior consistent with the conditions that enable and behaviors that result from this second paradox.

[1]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[2]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[3]  S. Lippman,et al.  A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[4]  Matthew J. Higgins,et al.  The Intra-Alliance Division of Value Created through Collaboration , 2011 .

[5]  W. MacLeod,et al.  Reputations, Relationships, and Contract Enforcement , 2007 .

[6]  J. H. Dyer Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[7]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[8]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Firms, contracts, and financial structure , 1995 .

[9]  M. Fratianni The Gravity Equation in International Trade , 2009 .

[10]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Orthogonality Conditions for Tobit Models with Fixed Effects , 1993 .

[11]  R. Dore Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism , 1983 .

[12]  Dovev Lavie Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[13]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Dealing with the Paradox of Embeddedness: The Role of Contracts and Trust in Facilitating Movement Out of Committed Relationships , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  Value creation and value capture under moral hazard: Exploring the micro‐foundations of buyer– supplier relationships , 2015 .

[15]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  Value Creation and Value Capture with Frictions , 2011 .

[16]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Francis L. Jeffries,et al.  Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting , 2000 .

[18]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  Value Creation and Value Capture under Moral Hazard: Exploring the Micro-Foundations of Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 2012 .

[19]  Victor Manuel Bennett,et al.  Organization and Bargaining: Sales Process Choice at Auto Dealerships , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Simon Board Relational Contracts and the Value of Loyalty , 2011 .

[21]  Bart S. Vanneste,et al.  Trust and Governance: Untangling a Tangled Web , 2008 .

[22]  R. Gulati,et al.  Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust , 2008 .

[23]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  What is a Relationship Worth? Repeated Exchange and the Development and Deployment of Relational Capital , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Matthew Grennan,et al.  Bargaining Ability and Competitive Advantage: Empirical Evidence from Medical Devices , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea , 2003 .

[26]  Benjamin Klein,et al.  Why 'Hold-Ups' Occur: The Self-Enforcing Range of Contractual Relationships , 1996 .

[27]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Bart S. Vanneste,et al.  Trust Over Time in Exchange Relationships: Meta-Analysis and Theory , 2013 .

[29]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[30]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Duynamics of Interorganizational Attachments: Auditor-Client Relationships , 1988 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[34]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Brokers and Competitive Advantage , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[35]  H. Stuart Value Gaps and Profitability , 2016 .

[36]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[37]  Gérard Roland,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies , 2016 .

[38]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm , 1997 .

[39]  Anjan V. Thakor,et al.  Firms, Contracts and Financial Structures. , 1996 .

[40]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[41]  J. Bergstrand The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence , 1985 .

[42]  Arvind Parkhe Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation , 1993 .

[43]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[44]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  A "Signal-Jamming" Theory of Predation , 1986 .

[45]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Biform Games , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[47]  Jeffrey L. Bradach,et al.  Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms , 1989 .

[48]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  The Dark Side of Close Relationships , 2013 .

[49]  Sylvain Chassang Building Routines: Learning, Cooperation, and the Dynamics of Incomplete Relational Contracts , 2010 .

[50]  C. Searle A common language , 1983 .

[51]  M. Nowak,et al.  Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. , 2000, Science.

[52]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  The Horizontal Scope of the Firm: Organizational Tradeoffs vs. Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Jeremy C. Stein,et al.  Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior , 1989 .

[54]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Value-based Business Strategy , 2005 .

[55]  Michael D. Ryall,et al.  How Do Value Creation and Competition Determine Whether a Firm Appropriates Value? , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[56]  K. Tan,et al.  Buyer‐supplier relationships: The impact of supplier selection and buyer‐supplier engagement on relationship and firm performance , 2006 .

[57]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Relational Contracts and Organizational Capabilities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[58]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[59]  Terry L. Boles,et al.  Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[60]  Bart S. Vanneste,et al.  Trust Over Time in Exchange Relationships: Meta-Analysis and Theory , 2013 .

[61]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Interorganizational Trust, Governance Choice, and Exchange Performance , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[62]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth , 1979 .

[63]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[64]  Amydee M. Fawcett,et al.  Trust and relational embeddedness: Exploring a paradox of trust pattern development in key supplier relationships , 2013 .

[65]  Ricard Gil,et al.  Self-Enforcing Agreements and Relational Contracting: Evidence from California Highway Procurement , 2013 .

[66]  Jeffrey H. Dyer EFFECTIVE INTERFIRM COLLABORATION : HOW FIRMS MINIMIZE TRANSACTION COSTS AND MAXIMIZE TRANSACTION VALUE r , 1998 .

[67]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[68]  Olivier Chatain,et al.  Value Creation, Competition and Performance in Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 2011 .

[69]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .