Do Takeover Targets Overinvest

I examine the capital expenditures of a sample of 700 takeover targets and firms that went private over the period 1972-1987. For the complete sample, I do not find evidence that takeover targets increase their capital expenditures over the four-year period before the acquisition or that they overinvest in capital expenditures relative to several benchmarks. Subsample results provide some evidence of overinvestment in oil and gas firms and large firms. There is no evidence of overinvestment, however, for firms acquired in a hostile takeover or firms that went private. In general, these results are not consistent with the conjecture that takeovers are motivated by the need to reduce excess investment in capital expenditures in target firms. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.

[1]  David J. Denis Corporate Investment Decisions and Corporate Control: Evidence from Going-Private Transactions , 1992 .

[2]  Yen-Sheng Huang,et al.  Target Abnormal Returns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payment, Acquisition Form, and Managerial Resistance , 1987 .

[3]  Steven N. Kaplan,et al.  The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value , 1989 .

[4]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The R&D Master File Documentation , 1988 .

[5]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Hostile Takeovers in the 1980s: The Return to Corporate Specialization , 1990 .

[6]  John Mcconnell,et al.  Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm , 1985 .

[7]  James L. Medoff,et al.  The Impact of Firm Acquisitions on Labor , 1987 .

[8]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies , 1990 .

[9]  Abbie J. Smith Corporate ownership structure and performance *1: The case of management buyouts , 1990 .

[10]  J. Rosett Do Union Wealth Concessions Explain Takeover Premiums? The Evidence on Contract Wages , 1989 .

[11]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[12]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Do Bad Bidders Become Good Targets , 1990 .

[13]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers , 1989 .

[14]  N Girard,et al.  The barbarians are at the gate. , 1994, Seminars in perioperative nursing.

[15]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers? , 1990 .

[16]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups , 1991 .

[17]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  TOBIN'S MARGINAL q AND AVERAGE q: A NEOCLASSICAL INTERPRETATION , 1982 .

[18]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions? , 1989 .

[19]  E. Jacobs The agency cost of corporate control : the petroleum industry , 1986 .

[20]  E. Lindenberg,et al.  Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization , 1981 .

[21]  Michael Bradley,et al.  Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms , 1988 .

[22]  Kenneth J. Martin,et al.  Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeovers, and Management Turnover , 1991 .

[23]  René M. Stulz,et al.  A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: The Case of Bidder Returns , 1991 .

[24]  H. Servaes Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers , 1991 .

[25]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Bank Monitoring and Investment: Evidence from the Changing Structure of Japanese Corporate Banking Relationships , 1989 .

[26]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Business Behavior, Value, and Growth , 1960 .

[27]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Characteristics of Targets of Hostile and Friendly Takeovers , 1988 .

[28]  Characteristics of Hostile and Friendly Takeover Targets , 1987 .

[29]  Vojislav Maksimovic,et al.  Consistent Estimation of Cross-Sectional Models in Event Studies , 1990 .