A Systemic view of the learning and differentiation of scientific concepts

In learning conceptual knowledge in physics, a common problem is the incompleteness of a learning process, where students’ personal, often undifferentiated concepts take on more scientific and differentiated form. With regard to such concept learning and differentiation, this study proposes a systemic view in which concepts are considered as complex, dynamically evolving structures. The dynamics of the concept learning and differentiation is driven by the competition of model utility in explaining the evidence. Based on the systemic view, we introduce computational model, which represents the essential features of the conceptual system in the form of directed graph (DGM), where concepts are nodes connected to other conceptual elements (nodes) in the graph. The results of a DGM are then compared to the empirical findings to identify differentiation between concepts of electric current and voltage based on a re-analysis of previously published empirical findings on upped secondary school students’ learning paths in the context of DC circuits. The comparison shows that the model predicts and explains many relevant, empirically observed features of the learning paths of concept learning and differentiation, such as: 1) Context-dependent dynamics, 2) the persistence of ontological shift and concept differentiation, and 3) the effects of communication on individual learning paths.  The systemic view and the DGM model based on it make these generic features of interest in concept learning and differentiation understandable and show that these features are associated with the guidance of theoretical knowledge. Finally, we discuss briefly the implications of the results on teaching and instruction.  Normal 0 21 false false false NL-BE JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

[1]  F. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment , 2007 .

[2]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits , 2004 .

[3]  B. Eylon,et al.  Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .

[4]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Contrasting Ohlsson's Resubsumption Theory With Chi's Categorical Shift Theory , 2009 .

[5]  David Danks.  Not different kinds, just special cases. , 2010, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[6]  David Hammer,et al.  Conceptual change in physics , 2013 .

[7]  Bob Rehder,et al.  Categorization as causal reasoning , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  P. Lipton,et al.  Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science , 1993 .

[9]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[10]  Ismo Koponen,et al.  Systemic view of learning scientific concepts: A description in terms of directed graph model , 2014, Complex..

[11]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Deep Learning - How the Mind Overrides Experience , 2011 .

[12]  Ismo T. Koponen,et al.  Concept Development in Learning Physics: The Case of Electric Current and Voltage Revisited , 2013 .

[13]  James D. Slotta,et al.  The Ontological Coherence of Intuitive Physics , 1993 .

[14]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective* , 2010, Philosophy of Science.

[15]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[16]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning , 2007 .

[17]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Resubsumption: A Possible Mechanism for Conceptual Change and Belief Revision , 2009 .

[18]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[19]  Nancy Law,et al.  Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift , 2001 .

[20]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Nomic Concepts, Frames, and Conceptual Change , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[21]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[22]  Dimitris Psillos,et al.  Causal structures and counter-intuitive experiments in electricity , 1997 .

[23]  E. Machery.  Doing without Concepts , 2009 .

[24]  Ayush Gupta,et al.  The Case for Dynamic Models of Learners' Ontologies in Physics , 2010 .

[25]  S. Carey.  The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[26]  M. Chi,et al.  Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions , 2000 .

[27]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Creating Scientific Concepts , 2008 .

[28]  P. Barker.  The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 2006 .

[29]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[30]  David Shipstone,et al.  A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits , 1984 .

[31]  M. Chi.  Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[32]  S. Carey,et al.  On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density , 1985, Cognition.