The action of selection on codon bias in the human genome is related to frequency, complexity, and chronology of amino acids

BackgroundThe question of whether synonymous codon choice is affected by cellular tRNA abundance has been positively answered in many organisms. In some recent works, concerning the human genome, this relation has been studied, but no conclusive answers have been found. In the human genome, the variation in base composition and the absence of cellular tRNA count data makes the study of the question more complicated. In this work we study the relation between codon choice and tRNA abundance in the human genome by correcting relative codon usage for background base composition and using a measure based on tRNA-gene copy numbers as a rough estimate of tRNA abundance.ResultsWe term major codons to be those codons with a relatively large tRNA-gene copy number for their corresponding amino acid. We use two measures of expression: breadth of expression (the number of tissues in which a gene was expressed) and maximum expression level among tissues (the highest value of expression of a gene among tissues). We show that for half the amino acids in the study (8 of 16) the relative major codon usage rises with breadth of expression. We show that these amino acids are significantly more frequent, are smaller and simpler, and are more ancient than the rest of the amino acids. Similar, although weaker, results were obtained for maximum expression level.ConclusionThere is evidence that codon bias in the human genome is related to selection, although the selection forces acting on codon bias may not be straightforward and may be different for different amino acids. We suggest that, in the first group of amino acids, selection acts to enhance translation efficiency in highly expressed genes by preferring major codons, and acts to reduce translation rate in lowly expressed genes by preferring non-major ones. In the second group of amino acids other selection forces, such as reducing misincorporation rate of expensive amino acids, in terms of their size/complexity, may be in action.The fact that codon usage is more strongly related to breadth of expression than to maximum expression level supports the notion, presented in a recent study, that codon choice may be related to the tRNA abundance in the tissue in which a gene is expressed.

[1]  L. Hurst,et al.  Evidence for purifying selection against synonymous mutations in mammalian exonic splicing enhancers. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  L. Hurst,et al.  Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals , 2005, Genome Biology.

[3]  H. Akashi Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[4]  T. Ikemura Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  H. Akashi,et al.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.

[6]  G Bernardi,et al.  The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. , 1985, Science.

[7]  L. Duret,et al.  tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[8]  D. Graur,et al.  The "inverse relationship between evolutionary rate and age of mammalian genes" is an artifact of increased genetic distance with rate of evolution and time of divergence. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  M. Gouy,et al.  Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Edward N. Trifonov,et al.  The Triplet Code From First Principles , 2004, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[11]  Alexander E Vinogradov,et al.  Isochores and tissue-specificity. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  J. M. Comeron,et al.  Selective and Mutational Patterns Associated With Gene Expression in Humans , 2004, Genetics.

[13]  E. H. Margulies,et al.  Identification and prevention of a GC content bias in SAGE libraries. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  L. Hurst,et al.  The elevated GC content at exonic third sites is not evidence against neutralist models of isochore evolution. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  M J Dufton,et al.  Genetic code synonym quotas and amino acid complexity: cutting the cost of proteins? , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Hiroshi Akashi,et al.  Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. , 2003, Genetics.

[17]  Paul M. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes , 1986, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. , 2003, Genome research.

[19]  Arnold J Levine,et al.  Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  P. Sharp,et al.  Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  M. Bulmer The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[22]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  A unification of mosaic structures in the human genome. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[23]  Dirk Holste,et al.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphism–Based Validation of Exonic Splicing Enhancers , 2004, PLoS biology.

[24]  Shigehiko Kanaya,et al.  Codon Usage and tRNA Genes in Eukaryotes: Correlation of Codon Usage Diversity with Translation Efficiency and with CG-Dinucleotide Usage as Assessed by Multivariate Analysis , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  Yizhar Lavner,et al.  Codon bias as a factor in regulating expression via translation rate in the human genome. , 2005, Gene.

[26]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Synonymous Codon Usage, Accuracy of Translation, and Gene Length in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[27]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  Codon selection in yeast. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  T. Ikemura Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Jacek Majewski,et al.  Evidence for codon bias selection at the pre-mRNA level in eukaryotes. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[30]  L. Hurst,et al.  Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[31]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection. , 2001, Genetics.

[32]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Translational selection on codon usage in Xenopus laevis. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  J. Elf,et al.  Selective Charging of tRNA Isoacceptors Explains Patterns of Codon Usage , 2003, Science.

[34]  L. Hurst,et al.  Biased codon usage near intron-exon junctions: selection on splicing enhancers, splice-site recognition or something else? , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  Laurent Duret,et al.  No evidence for tissue-specific adaptation of synonymous codon usage in humans. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  Etsuko N. Moriyama,et al.  Codon Usage Bias and tRNA Abundance in Drosophila , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.