Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners

Combining both interview data and empirical analyses at the patent and firm levels, we explore the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of R&D collaboration resulting in the co-ownership of intellectual property (i.e. co-patents). We make an explicit distinction between three different types of co-patenting partners: intra-industry partners, inter-industry partners, and universities. Our findings indicate that the value-appropriation challenges of IP sharing are clearly evident with intra-industry co-patenting, where partners are more likely to encounter overlapping exploitation domains. Co-patenting with universities is associated with higher market value, since appropriation challenges are unlikely to play a role and collaboration may signal novel technological opportunities. Although we find some evidence that co-patenting corresponds to higher (patent) value, patents co-owned with firms are significantly less likely to receive self-citations, indicating constraints on the future exploitation and development of co-owned technologies.

[1]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[2]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[3]  J. Henkel Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[4]  Paolo Landoni,et al.  Exploring indicators of Open Innovation: the role of co-patents. , 2010 .

[5]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  The Market Valuation of Knowledge Assets in US and European Firms , 2006 .

[6]  Dries Faems,et al.  Building Appropriation Advantage: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Intellectual Property Management , 2013 .

[7]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Offsetting Illegitimacy? How Pressures from Securities Analysts Influence Incumbents in the Face of New Technologies , 2012 .

[8]  B. Tether Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[9]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[10]  P. Ritala,et al.  What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition , 2009 .

[11]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms , 2009 .

[12]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Co‐opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model , 2009 .

[13]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Modelling the Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation , 2011 .

[15]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Ownership and Control Rights in Internet Portal Alliances, 1995-1999 , 2003 .

[16]  K. Arrow,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2020 .

[17]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[18]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[19]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[20]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[21]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[22]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[23]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[24]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[25]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Management Control for Market Transactions: The Relation Between Transaction Characteristics, Incomplete Contract Design, and Subsequent Performance , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[26]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing , 2003 .

[27]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  INFORMATION PROCESSING MODERATORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRUST BASED GOVERNANCE OF INTER-FIRM R & D COLLABORATION , 2002 .

[28]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  The inter-organizational context of open innovation , 2006 .

[29]  Bart van Looy,et al.  The Initiation and Evolution of Interfirm Knowledge Transfer in R&D Relationships , 2007 .

[30]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights , 2003 .

[31]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  C. Bloch THE MARKET VALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE ASSETS , 2008 .

[33]  Cecil D. Quillen,et al.  Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent Office , 2001 .

[34]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[35]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[36]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Exclusivity, Contingent Control Rights, and the Design of Internet Portal Alliances , 2012 .

[37]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[38]  J. Hagedoorn Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. , 2003 .

[39]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[40]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology , 2007, Scientometrics.

[41]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity and R and D at the Firm Level , 1981 .

[42]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[43]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING ON AGGREGATE INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION , 1996 .

[44]  M. Reitzig Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[45]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure† , 2014 .

[46]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[47]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[48]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  Does the Market Value R&D Investment by European Firms? Evidence from a Panel of Manufacturing Firms in France, Germany, and Italy , 2004 .

[49]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[50]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[51]  Joshua Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2011 .

[52]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[53]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[54]  R. Merges,et al.  Co-Ownership of Patents: A Comparative and Economic View , 1990 .

[55]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research , 2003 .

[56]  Rachelle C. Sampson Organizational Choice in R&D Alliances: Knowledge Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives , 2004 .

[57]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Information Processing Moderators of the Effectiveness of Trust-Based Governance in Interfirm R&D Collaboration , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[58]  M. Goossen Sharing Intellectual Property Rights in an Era of Open Innovation , 2013 .

[59]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[60]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[61]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[62]  B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The Cost Factor in Patent Systems , 2006 .

[63]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Managing intellectual property in R&D alliances , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[64]  Stephen J. Carson,et al.  A theoretical and empirical investigation of property rights sharing in outsourced research, development, and engineering relationships , 2013 .

[65]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[66]  Y. Doz The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? , 2007 .

[67]  Sanna Wolk Report Q 194, AIPPI SPECIAL COMMITTEE – The impact of co–ownership of Intellectual Property Rights on their exploitation, , 2009 .

[68]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Joint patenting amongst companies - exploring the effects of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience , 2003 .

[69]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[70]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[71]  J. Nickerson,et al.  Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations , 2004 .

[72]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[73]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[74]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[75]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[76]  Z. Griliches Market Value, R&D, and Patents , 1981 .

[77]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[78]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[79]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[80]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[81]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Contract Law and the Governance of Inter-Firm Technology Partnerships - An Analysis of Different Modes of Partnering and Their Contractual Implications , 2007 .

[82]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[83]  B. Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm , 2010 .

[84]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Are Joint Patents Collusive? Evidence from the US and Europe , 2012 .

[85]  Sharon Belenzon Cumulative Innovation and Market Value: Evidence from Patent Citations , 2012 .

[86]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing , 1983 .