Improving cerebellar segmentation with statistical fusion

The cerebellum is a somatotopically organized central component of the central nervous system well known to be involved with motor coordination and increasingly recognized roles in cognition and planning. Recent work in multiatlas labeling has created methods that offer the potential for fully automated 3-D parcellation of the cerebellar lobules and vermis (which are organizationally equivalent to cortical gray matter areas). This work explores the trade offs of using different statistical fusion techniques and post hoc optimizations in two datasets with distinct imaging protocols. We offer a novel fusion technique by extending the ideas of the Selective and Iterative Method for Performance Level Estimation (SIMPLE) to a patch-based performance model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm, Non- Local SIMPLE, for segmentation of a mixed population of healthy subjects and patients with severe cerebellar anatomy. Under the first imaging protocol, we show that Non-Local SIMPLE outperforms previous gold-standard segmentation techniques. In the second imaging protocol, we show that Non-Local SIMPLE outperforms previous gold standard techniques but is outperformed by a non-locally weighted vote with the deeper population of atlases available. This work advances the state of the art in open source cerebellar segmentation algorithms and offers the opportunity for routinely including cerebellar segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging studies that acquire whole brain T1-weighted volumes with approximately 1 mm isotropic resolution.

[1]  Emile A. Hendriks,et al.  Local SIMPLE multi-atlas-based segmentation applied to lung lobe detection on chest CT , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Label Fusion in Atlas-Based Segmentation Using a Selective and Iterative Method for Performance Level Estimation (SIMPLE) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: Consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  Irene Daum,et al.  Cerebellar contributions to cognitive functions: A progress report after two decades of research , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[7]  P. Strick,et al.  Cerebellum and nonmotor function. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  Stephanie Powell,et al.  Registration and machine learning-based automated segmentation of subcortical and cerebellar brain structures , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Cerebellum segmentation in MRI using atlas registration and local multi-scale image descriptors , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  E. Fine,et al.  The history of the development of the cerebellar examination. , 2002, Seminars in neurology.

[12]  B. Puri,et al.  Cerebellum segmentation employing texture properties and knowledge based image processing: applied to normal adult controls and patients. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Bennett A. Landman,et al.  SIMPLE Is a Good Idea (and Better with Context Learning) , 2014, MICCAI.

[15]  Aaron Carass,et al.  Automated Cerebellar Lobule Segmentation using Graph Cuts , 2014 .

[16]  N Ramnani,et al.  A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum , 2009, NeuroImage.