Constructing a Broader and More Inclusive Value System in Science

ABSTRACT A scientific culture that welcomes a diversity of participants and addresses a broad range of questions is critical to the success of the scientific enterprise and essential for engaging the public in science. By favoring behaviors and practices that result in a narrow set of outcomes, our current scientific culture may lower the diversity of the scientific workforce, limit the range and relevance of scientific pursuits, and restrict the scope of interdisciplinary collaboration and public engagement. The scientific community will reach its full intellectual potential and secure public support through thorough, multitiered initiatives that aim to change individual and institutional behaviors, shift current reward structures to reflect a wider set of values, and explicitly consider societal benefits in the establishment of research agendas. We discuss some shortcomings and costs of the current value system and provide some guidelines for the development of initiatives that transcend such limitations.

[1]  Lotte Bailyn,et al.  A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT , 1999 .

[2]  Kelly Ward,et al.  Addressing Academic Culture: Service Learning, Organizations, and Faculty Work , 1998 .

[3]  Castl Survey.  The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching , 1910, Nature.

[4]  Barbara A. Holland,et al.  Analyzing Institutional Commitment to Service: A Model of Key Organizational Factors , 1997 .

[5]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[6]  Linda Serra Hagedorn,et al.  Women's Perceptions of a "Chilly Climate" and Their Cognitive Outcomes during the First Year of College , 1997 .

[7]  Benjamin R. Barber.  The Civic Mission of the University , 1989 .

[8]  J. King.  Benefits of Women in Science , 2005, Science.

[9]  E. Brody.  Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .

[10]  Stephanie Pfirman,et al.  Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences , 2007 .

[11]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[12]  Ellen Galinsky,et al.  The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce , 1998 .

[13]  Muriel Niederle,et al.  Do Women shy away from Competition , 2004 .

[14]  D. Rhoten,et al.  Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path , 2004, Science.

[15]  David Grimm.  Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published , 2005, Science.

[16]  K. O’Meara,et al.  Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does It Make a Difference? , 2005 .

[17]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[18]  R. M. Hall,et al.  The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?. , 1982 .

[19]  Angela B. Ginorio.  Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science. , 1995 .

[20]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Visibility matters: increasing knowledge of women's contributions to ecology , 2005 .

[21]  Virginia Valian.  Why so slow? : the advancement of women , 1998 .

[22]  Yu Xie,et al.  Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes , 2003 .

[23]  J. Mervis.  NSF Begins a Push to Measure Societal Impacts of Research , 2006, Science.

[24]  B. Checkoway.  Renewing the Civic Mission of the American Research University , 2001 .

[25]  Geoffrey V. Sutton.  Science For A Polite Society: Gender, Culture, And The Demonstration Of Enlightenment , 1995 .

[26]  Marcia Barinaga.  Is There a `Female Style' in Science? , 1993, Science.

[27]  null null,et al.  Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge In Science, Engineering, And Technology , 2001 .

[28]  E. Campbell.  Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion , 2002 .

[29]  Nancy Hopkins,et al.  A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT , 2002 .

[30]  J. Koricheva,et al.  What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .