Effective Teachers for At-Risk or Highly Mobile Students: What are the Dispositions and Behaviors of Award-Winning Teachers?

What distinguishes effective teachers of at-risk or highly mobile students was the essential question addressed in this study. We conducted a cross-case analysis of US national or state award-winning teachers who taught in schools with student populations characterized as highly mobile, homeless, and/or high poverty. Six teachers meeting the criteria were selected as participants. Frameworks of effective teaching characteristics were adapted from prior research and from a review of the literature to gather on-site classroom observational and interview data from participating teachers. The data were examined in light of extant research related to teaching at-risk or highly mobile students and yielded information regarding beliefs and practices. Teachers' interview responses focused on 2 main areas of teacher effectiveness: the importance of student–teacher relationships and instructional delivery. These teachers emphasized affective and academic needs in their planning, instruction, and assessment. They had high expectations of students and were committed to ensuring that students had what they needed to succeed. Teachers maintained high student engagement and used a variety of instructional activities and a wide range of cognitive levels in the questions asked during their instruction which was primarily teacher-directed. Additional research into effective teaching and working with at-risk or highly mobile students is recommended.

[1]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Effective Schools and Accomplished Teachers: Lessons about Primary-Grade Reading Instruction in Low-Income Schools , 2000, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[3]  C. Benson,et al.  America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2001. , 2000 .

[4]  J. Hardy.  What the Best College Teachers Do , 2007 .

[5]  Patricia A. Popp,et al.  Students on the Move: Reaching and Teaching Highly Mobile Children and Youth , 2003 .

[6]  Dc Washington.  National Partnership for Teaching in At-Risk Schools. , 2005 .

[7]  T. Weinstein,et al.  Classroom Process Differences in Inner-City Elementary Schools , 1997 .

[8]  Karen B. Givvin,et al.  Mathematics Teaching in the United States Today (and Tomorrow): Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study , 2005 .

[9]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Change in Teacher Efficacy and Student Self-and Task-Related Beliefs in Mathematics During the Transition to Junior High School , 2004 .

[10]  P. Fidler.  The Relationship between Teacher Instructional Techniques and Characteristics and Student Achievement in Reduced Size Classes. , 2002 .

[11]  Gregory J. Palardy,et al.  Teacher Effectiveness in First Grade: The Importance of Background Qualifications, Attitudes, and Instructional Practices for Student Learning , 2008 .

[12]  Harold H. Wenglinsky.  Closing the Racial Achievement Gap:The Role of Reforming Instructional Practices , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Looking in Classrooms , 1973 .

[14]  L. Mcdonnell,et al.  Analysis of the School Preferred Reading Program in Selected Los Angeles Minority Schools. , 1976 .

[15]  N. Kober.  It Takes More Than Testing: Closing the Achievement Gap. A Report of the Center on Education Policy. , 2001 .

[16]  North Carolina.  Closing the Achievement Gap: Views from Nine Schools. , 2000 .

[17]  A. H. Maslow,et al.  Toward a psychology of being, Princeton (D. van Nostrand Company) 1962. , 1962 .

[18]  T. Howard.  Hearing Footsteps in the Dark: African American Students' Descriptions of Effective Teachers , 2002 .

[19]  R. Aronson.  When at-risk students defy the odds , 2001 .

[20]  F. C. Johnson.  Migrant Students at the Secondary Level: Issues and Opportunities for Change. , 1986 .

[21]  Patricia A. Popp.  Reading on the Go! Volume 2: A Handbook of Resources , 2007 .

[22]  C. Midgley,et al.  Change in Teacher Efficacy and Student Self- and Task-Related Beliefs in Mathematics During the Transition to Junior High School , 1989 .

[23]  José Agustín Ruiz-Escalante,et al.  Instructional Strategies for Migrant Students. ERIC Digest. , 1995 .

[24]  Bethann Berliner.  Educating Homeless Students. , 2002 .

[25]  Kati Haycock,et al.  Teaching Inequality: How Poor and Minority Students Are Shortchanged on Teacher Quality: A Report and Recommendations by the Education Trust. , 2006 .

[26]  The Extent and Consequences of Risk in U.S. Education , 2005 .

[27]  L. Hedges,et al.  How Large Are Teacher Effects? , 2004 .

[28]  S. Carter.  No Excuses : Lessons from 21 High-Performing, High-Poverty Schools , 1999 .

[29]  Claire E. Smrekar,et al.  "It's a Way of Life for Us": High Mobility and High Achievement in Department of Defense Schools. , 2003 .

[30]  Ronald F. Ferguson.  What Doesn't Meet the Eye: Understanding and Addressing Racial Disparities in High-Achieving Suburban Schools. , 2002 .

[31]  James H. Stronge,et al.  Qualities of Effective Teachers , 2002 .

[32]  Judy K. Stewart,et al.  All Students Reaching The Top: Strategies for Closing Academic Achievement Gaps. A Report of the National Study Group for the Affirmative Development of Academic Ability. , 2004 .

[33]  Sandra P. Horn,et al.  Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation , 1997 .

[34]  F. Bailey,et al.  To Meet Your Students Where They Are, First You Have To Find Them: Working with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse At-Risk Students. , 2002 .

[35]  Tracy L. Cross,et al.  The differentiated classroom observation scale , 2004 .

[36]  Pamela A. Smith,et al.  Opening Doors: Promising Lessons from Five Texas High Schools. , 2001 .

[37]  F. Campbell,et al.  At-Risk Students' Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness. , 1999 .

[38]  Naomi Goldstein,et al.  America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2005. , 2005 .

[39]  William L. Sanders,et al.  The tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment , 1994 .

[40]  Robert L. Mendro.  Student Achievement and School and Teacher Accountability , 1998 .

[41]  John Snyder,et al.  Urban Educators' Perceptions of Successful Teaching , 1997 .

[42]  A. Maslow.  Toward a Psychology of Being , 1962 .

[43]  Rosa Aronson,et al.  At-Risk Students Defy the Odds: Overcoming Barriers to Educational Success , 2001 .

[44]  M. Pressley,et al.  Providence-St. Mel School: How a School That Works for African American Students Works. , 2004 .

[45]  Judith A. Langer.  Beating the Odds: Teaching Middle and High School Students to Read and Write Well , 2001 .

[46]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Reading Growth in High-Poverty Classrooms , 2003 .

[47]  Karen B Givvin,et al.  Mathematics Teaching in the United States Today (and Tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study , 2006 .

[48]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[49]  B. Wilson,et al.  What Urban Students Say About Good Teaching. , 2002 .

[50]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Reading Growth in High-Poverty Classrooms: The Influence of Teacher Practices That Encourage Cognitive Engagement in Literacy Learning , 2003, The Elementary School Journal.

[51]  Paul E. Barton.  Parsing the Achievement Gap: Baselines for Tracking Progress. Policy Information Report. , 2003 .