Determining linkage and mode of inheritance: Mod scores and other methods

The lod score method remains a popular approach for detecting linkage and estimating the recombination fraction θ between a marker locus and a trait locus. However, its implementation requires knowledge of all parameters of the genetic mechanism, including the number of loci involved and the genotype specific penetrance, which could depend on factors such as age. When some of the penetrance parameters ϕ are unknown, several methods are available, and have been reviewed by Hodge and Elston [(1994) Genet Epidemiol 11:329–342]. These include the “wrod score” (lod score maximized over θ under a wrong value of ϕ) and “mod score” (lod score maximized over both θ and ϕ) methods for inference on θ. It has further been proposed that the mod score also be used for estimating ϕ. In this paper, we review and assess the adequacy of these two methods for inferences on both ϕ and θ. In particular, all of the methods can be seen as variations on likelihood inference, using the information in the conditional likelihood for the marker data, given the trait data. The loss of efficiency of the mod is compared to that of the full likelihood, which utilizes all information available in the trait data. We also propose an alternative, based on the pseudo‐likelihood, where ϕ is estimated via the trait information and plugged into the conditional likelihood. This method is compared to the mod score method, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are elucidated. In particular, it is seen that the pseudo‐likelihood method can be more efficient than the mod score method if the ascertainment scheme can be modeled. As examples, both a random sample and a multiplex ascertainment scheme are considered. In addition, the pseudo‐likelihood method leads to likelihood ratio tests for detecting linkage with a simple, known asymptotic reference distribution, a feature not shared by the mod score. Finally, we discuss the advantages of using the pseudo‐likelihood method over the full likelihood method, both of which are valid when the ascertainment scheme is known. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.