An examination of the ‘rule of law’ and ‘justice’ implications in Online Dispute Resolution in construction projects

This paper examines the ‘rule of law’ and ‘justice’ implications of using Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms as technology-mediated interfaces for small claim dispute resolution in construction projects. Data is obtained from a questionnaire survey of construction stakeholders, administered using direct non-random sampling of professional contacts with the authors. Data is analysed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) on a Windows 7 platform. Surprisingly, study findings do not suggest any ‘rule of law’ and ‘justice’ implications for small claim ODR. Tentatively, this conclusion supports wider use of ODR. The originality of the study is that although there is considerable academic and practitioner interest in various alternative forms of dispute resolution (ADR), both practitioner use and academic study of ODR remain sparse. Thus, this study serves as a foundation for further empirical exploration of ODR as a nascent component of ADR.

[1]  José Neves,et al.  Using Case-Based Reasoning and Principled Negotiation to provide decision support for dispute resolution , 2012, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[2]  Leo Marx,et al.  Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept , 2010 .

[3]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA) , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology‐mediated customer service experience , 2004 .

[5]  J. Thomas,et al.  Dancing in the white spaces: Exploring gendered assumptions in successful project managers’ discourse about their work☆ , 2007 .

[6]  David R Schaefer,et al.  Conflict and Fairness in Social Exchange , 2006 .

[7]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Rule of law and the international diffusion of e-commerce , 2005, CACM.

[8]  G. O'donnell.  The Quality of Democracy: Why the Rule of Law Matters , 2004 .

[9]  Faisal Kutty.  The Shari'a Factor in International Commercial Arbitration , 2005 .

[10]  Michael G. Harvey,et al.  Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice , 2006 .

[11]  Tak Wing Yiu,et al.  How Do Personality Traits Affect Construction Dispute Negotiation? Study of Big Five Personality Model , 2011 .

[12]  Jonathan R. Crawshaw,et al.  Organizational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics , 2013 .

[13]  R. Wolff.  A Refutation of Rawls' Theorem on Justice , 1966 .

[14]  Deborah H. Stevenson,et al.  PM critical competency index: IT execs prefer soft skills , 2010 .

[15]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM , 1998 .

[16]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view , 2015, Information Systems Frontiers.

[17]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field , 1987 .

[18]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Modeling Consumers’ Adoption Intentions of Remote Mobile Payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with Innovativeness, Risk, and Trust , 2015 .

[19]  A. Gale.  Women in Non-traditional Occupations: The Construction Industry , 1994 .

[20]  J. Botero,et al.  Measuring the Rule of Law , 2011 .

[21]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Role of construction in economic development: Review of key concepts in the past 40 years , 2011 .

[22]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Emotions in ODR , 2007 .

[23]  Shuibo Zhang,et al.  Influence of Trust and Contract on Dispute Negotiation Behavioral Strategy in Construction Subcontracting , 2016 .

[24]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet , 2009 .

[25]  M. Zelditch,,et al.  Some Methodological Problems of Field Studies , 1962, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  L. Hoffman.  Access to Information, Access to Justice: The Role of Presuit Investigatory Discovery , 2006 .

[27]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Selection and use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in construction projects — Past and future research , 2016 .

[28]  P. Ortolani.  Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons from Bitcoin , 2016 .

[29]  M. Scott Donahey,et al.  Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace , 1998, Journal of International Arbitration.

[30]  J. Meredith,et al.  Alternative research paradigms in operations , 1989 .

[31]  Faisal Kutty.  The Shari'A Law Factor in International Commercial Arbitration , 2006 .

[32]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Dennis M. Murphy.  The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom , 2012 .

[34]  S. Voigt,et al.  The rule of law and constitutionalism in Muslim countries , 2014 .

[35]  Ralph Katz.  The human side of managing technological innovation : a collection of readings , 2004 .

[36]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world , 2015 .

[37]  U. Ojiako,et al.  Exploring the impact of cultural values on project performance: The effects of cultural values, age and gender on the perceived importance of project success/failure factors , 2014 .

[38]  Ivan P. L. Png,et al.  Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement, and Trial , 1983 .

[39]  M. Richard,et al.  A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions , 2017 .

[40]  Marly Monteiro de Carvalho,et al.  Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills , 2015 .

[41]  Harshi Madhuka Jayasinghe,et al.  Adjudication Practice and Its Enforceability in the Sri Lankan Construction Industry , 2016 .

[42]  Rebecca Brennan,et al.  MISMATCH.COM: ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DIVORCE , 2012 .

[43]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  An Empirical Validation of , 1987 .

[44]  Peter H. Schuck.  Why Don't Law Professors Do More Empirical Research?. , 1989 .

[45]  Adam R. Tanielian.  Arbitration Still Best Road to Binding Dispute Resolution , 2013 .

[46]  Peerasit Patanakul,et al.  Gender Biases in Hiring Project Managers: Perceptions of Trust and Likeability , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[47]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[48]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  The unsettling of “settled science:” The past and future of the management of projects , 2016 .

[49]  Austin D. Sarat.  Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in a Small Claims Court , 1976 .

[50]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[51]  Karolina Mania,et al.  Online dispute resolution: The future of justice , 2015 .

[52]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Anatomy of Construction Disputes , 2013 .

[53]  Jacqueline H. Watts,et al.  Porn, pride and pessimism: experiences of women working in professional construction roles , 2007 .

[54]  박흥식.  Public Administration Review 편집팀, 어떻게 구성되는가? , 2014 .

[55]  M. Radin.  ON LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP , 1937 .

[56]  Harry Boer,et al.  Operations and supply chain management : the role of academics and practitioners in the development of research and practice , 2016 .

[57]  Dan W. Brockt,et al.  The Theory of Justice , 2017 .

[58]  E. Rasmusen,et al.  Comparative Litigation Rates , 2010 .

[59]  E. Schatzberg.  Technik Comes to America: Changing Meanings of Technology before 1930 , 2006 .

[60]  L. Tetrick,et al.  The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  J. Concato,et al.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[62]  MAppSc Valerie Francis Be,et al.  Exploring Vocational Guidance and Gender in Construction , 2014 .

[63]  Kathleen M. J. Harmon,et al.  Resolution of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies , 2003 .

[64]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[65]  S. Boehme.  Sceptics of the Screen: Irish Perceptions of Online Dispute Resolution , 2015 .

[66]  Mark Winter,et al.  Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network , 2006 .

[67]  BlankeGordon,et al.  Construction disputes under UAE law: some initial considerations , 2015 .

[68]  Michael R. Heise.  The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism , 2002 .

[69]  Soo Young Rieh.  On the Web at home: Information seeking and Web searching in the home environment , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[70]  Ali Haghani,et al.  Inter-phase feedbacks in construction projects , 2015 .

[71]  Julia Ho¨rnle.  Online Dispute Resolution: The Emperor's New Clothes? , 2003 .

[72]  John Seidler,et al.  On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis , 1974 .

[73]  Janet K. Martinez,et al.  An Analytic Framework for Dispute Systems Design , 2009 .

[74]  C. Sunstein,et al.  The New Legal Realism , 2007 .

[75]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  An Investigation of Justice in supply chain relationships and their performance impact , 2013 .

[76]  Brian Pappas.  Med-Arb and the Legalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution , 2015 .

[77]  Eilionóir Flynn,et al.  Assistive technology as support for the exercise of legal capacity , 2015 .

[78]  Deborah L. Kellogg,et al.  HOW PROFESSORS OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT VIEW SERVICE OPERATIONS? , 1999 .

[79]  R. Cotterrell.  Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory , 2013 .

[80]  Colin Rule,et al.  Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value - High Volume Claims - OAS Developments , 2010 .

[81]  Peerasit Patanakul,et al.  “The aura of capability”: Gender bias in selection for a project manager job , 2017 .

[82]  Donelda S. McKechnie,et al.  The United Arab Emirates: The twenty‐first century beckons , 2007 .

[83]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[84]  Kris R. Nielsen,et al.  Call for Papers: Special Issue on Alternative Dispute Resolution for the Engineering and Construction Industry , 2011 .

[85]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[86]  H. Gadlin.  The Ombudsman: What's in a Name? , 2000 .

[87]  Yung Shin Van Der Sype,et al.  Online dispute resolution: Settling data protection disputes in a digital world of customers , 2016, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[88]  David Lyons.  Formal Justice, Moral Commitment, and Judicial Precedent , 1984 .

[89]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Trustworthiness of digital government services: deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling , 2018, Digital Government and Public Management.

[90]  Cecilia M. Plaza,et al.  Best Practices for Survey Research Reports Revisited: Implications of Target Population, Probability Sampling, and Response Rate , 2009, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[91]  Paula Gerber,et al.  Dispute Avoidance Procedures ('DAPs') - The Changing Face of Construction Dispute Management , 2013 .

[92]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: Toward developing a unified view , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[93]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Examining the role of three sets of innovation attributes for determining adoption of the interbank mobile payment service , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[94]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Effects of national culture on e-government diffusion - A global study of 55 countries , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[95]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[96]  Ian Hurd.  The International Rule of Law: Law and the Limit of Politics , 2014, Ethics & International Affairs.

[97]  A. Samer Ezeldin,et al.  Dispute Review Boards: Expected Application on Egyptian Large-Scale Construction Projects , 2007 .

[98]  Elisabeth Wilson-Evered,et al.  Predicting uptake of technology innovations in online family dispute resolution services: An application and extension of the UTAUT , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[99]  J. Price,et al.  Research Limitations and the Necessity of Reporting Them , 2004 .

[100]  J. Pinto,et al.  Lessons for an accidental profession , 1995 .

[101]  T. M. F. Smith,et al.  On the validity of interferences from non-random samples , 1983 .

[102]  Antonin Scalia,et al.  The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules , 1989 .

[103]  Hsiu-Mei Huang,et al.  Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[104]  R. Kline.  Construing "Technology" as "Applied Science": Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880-1945 , 1995, Isis.

[105]  Pablo Cortés.  Developing Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the EU: A Proposal for the Regulation of Accredited Providers , 2011, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[106]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  Operations management research: some reflections on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM , 1997 .

[107]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[108]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[109]  Nicholas Chileshe,et al.  Analysis of reverse logistics implementation practices by South Australian construction organisations , 2016 .

[110]  Heather Devine.  Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America , 1997 .

[111]  Scott J. Shackelford,et al.  Building the Virtual Courthouse: Ethical Considerations for Design, Implementation, and Regulation in the World of ODR , 2014 .

[112]  原田 明彦,et al.  Takeda Pharmaceutical's E-Notebook Project Report , 2014 .

[113]  B. S. Sahay,et al.  Supply chain partners' trust building process through risk evaluation: the perspectives of UAE packaged food industry , 2009 .

[114]  Simon A. Roberts.  ‘Listing Concentrates the Mind’: the English Civil Court as an Arena for Structured Negotiation , 2009 .

[115]  Melanie J. Ashleigh,et al.  Heterogeneity and perception congruence of project outcomes , 2015 .

[116]  H. Ahmad.,et al.  Determining Sample Size for Research Activities , 2017 .

[117]  David Gefen,et al.  Exploring the relative impact of biological sex and masculinity–femininity values on information technology use , 2017, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[118]  Hyojoo Son,et al.  Toward an understanding of construction professionals' acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model , 2012 .

[119]  Essam Zaneldin,et al.  Construction claims in United Arab Emirates: Types, causes, and frequency , 2006 .

[120]  A. D'Amato.  On the Connection between Law and Justice , 2011 .

[121]  Debopam Roy,et al.  Impact of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and Recent Amendments on Construction Industry , 2015 .

[122]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Construction Litigation, U.S. General Services Administration, 1980–2004 , 2009 .

[123]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  The Occurrence Likelihood of Construction Disputes , 2014 .

[124]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research , 2007 .

[125]  Melanie J. Ashleigh,et al.  The Criticality of Transferable Skills Development and Virtual Learning Environments Used in the Teaching of Project Management , 2011 .

[126]  Jungkun Park,et al.  Service failures in online double deviation scenarios: justice theory approach , 2010 .

[127]  Mediating in your pajamas: The benefits and challenges for ODR practitioners , 2006 .

[128]  Penny Brooker,et al.  Judging Unreasonable Litigation Behavior at the Interface of Mediation in the English Jurisdiction , 2010 .

[129]  L. Mulcahy.  The Collective Interest in Private Dispute Resolution , 2013 .

[130]  Lisa Blomgren Bingham.  The Next Step: Research on How Dispute System Design Affects Function , 2002 .

[131]  M. Krygier.  Why the rule of law matters , 2017 .

[132]  Tina Nabatchi.  The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Federal Government , 2007 .

[133]  Amartya Sen,et al.  What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice , 2006 .

[134]  Md. Zahidul Islam.  Provision of Alternative Dispute Resolution Process in Islam , 2012 .

[135]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  A grounded theory of women's career under-achievement in large UK construction companies , 2000 .

[136]  B Watkin,et al.  Rule of law. , 1977, Nursing mirror and midwives journal.

[137]  Yadong Luo,et al.  How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance? , 2012 .

[138]  Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley.  Lawyers, Non-Lawyers and Mediation: Rethinking the Professional Monopoly from a Problem-Solving Perspective , 2002 .

[139]  Dispute boards on major infrastructure projects , 2009 .

[140]  Ethan Katsh,et al.  Ten Years Of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Looking At The Past And Constructing The Future , 2006 .

[141]  José Neves,et al.  Online dispute resolution: an artificial intelligence perspective , 2012, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[142]  Joseph Goodman,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Online Dispute Resolution: An Assessment of Cyber-Mediation Websites , 2003 .