The role of surrogate models in combined aeroelastic and structural optimization of cable-stayed bridges with single box deck

The aeroelastic phenomena represent a crucial issue in the design of long span bridges and their relevance grows as the length of the spans is increased, which is the current trend in these mega-structures. The search for the best performing deck cross-section, as well as the search of the most economic bridge design, are two of the most relevant goals for bridge designers. Hence, the pursuit of good aerodynamic performance of the bridge deck cross-section and the structural optimization of the bridge are destined to converge in a unified process to achieve more efficient bridge designs, given their interdependence. This paper presents an integrated methodology based on a surrogate-based optimization process to obtain an optimum bridge design considering structural and aeroelastic constraints. The deck cross-section used in this work is the well-known G1 section, in which two deck shape variables are considered. The aerodynamic behavior of the cross sections analyzed by the optimization algorithm is given by a surrogate model trained with a set of designs calculated with CFD techniques. The structural performance is analyzed by means of finite element analysis. The areas and prestressing forces of the stays and the deck shape and plate thickness are considered as design variables, and the optimization of the bridge is carried out by a gradient-based optimization algorithm.

[1]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  On Flutter and Buffeting Mechanisms in Long-Span Bridges , 1988 .

[2]  Noureddine Bouhaddi,et al.  Multi-objective optimization in dynamics of the structures with nonlinear behavior: Contributions of the metamodels , 2009 .

[3]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  AIR FOIL AND BRIDGE DECK FLUTTER DERIVATIVES , 1971 .

[4]  A. Baldomir,et al.  Cable optimization of a long span cable stayed bridge in La Coruña (Spain) , 2010, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[5]  Santiago Hernández,et al.  Efficient methodologies for reliability-based design optimization of composite panels , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[6]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[7]  Massimiliano Lazzari,et al.  Time domain modelling of aeroelastic bridge decks: a comparative study and an application , 2005 .

[8]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[9]  Santiago Hernández,et al.  Optimum design of long-span suspension bridges considering aeroelastic and kinematic constraints , 2009 .

[10]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[11]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization of civil structures: A CFD-enabled Kriging-based approach , 2015 .

[12]  D. Krige A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, by D.G. Krige, published in the Journal, December 1951 : introduction by the author , 1951 .

[13]  Katja Gruenewald,et al.  Practical Applications Of Design Optimization , 2016 .

[14]  Allan Larsen,et al.  Shaping of bridge box girders to avoid vortex shedding response , 2012 .

[15]  Yukio Tamura,et al.  Development of CFD and applications: Monologue by a non-CFD-expert , 2015 .

[16]  Sophia Lefantzi,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. , 2011 .

[17]  F. Nieto,et al.  Bridge deck flutter derivatives: Efficient numerical evaluation exploiting their interdependence , 2015 .

[18]  José Ángel,et al.  Bridge aeroelasticity : sensitivity analysis and optimal design , 2011 .