How Psychology and Cognition Can Inform the Creation of Ontologies in Semantic Technologies

This paper demonstrates how cognitive psychology can contribute to the development of ontologies for semantic technologies and the semantic web. Specifically, the way in which the human cognitive system structures and processes conceptual information can act as a model for structuring formal ontologies, and can guide knowledge elicitation and the use of controlled natural languages. One conclusion is that during knowledge elicitation the dynamic nature of human information retrieval needs to be taken into account to obtain an ontology that is appropriate for its context of use. A further practical implication is that ontology developers need to be more specific and explicit about what they mean by the term ontology (e.g. does an ontology describe typical concept attributes or attributes that are true of most instances?) when explaining the use of concepts in ontologies to domain experts. Crown Copyright 2008

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[4]  P. Pollard,et al.  On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  The effect of context on the structure of categories , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[8]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[9]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[10]  S. Sloman.  Categorical Inference Is Not a Tree: The Myth of Inheritance Hierarchies , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  G. Murphy,et al.  Thematic relations in adults' concepts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[13]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Web ontology segmentation: analysis, classification and use , 2006, WWW '06.

[15]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  Knowledge Elicitation Plug-In for Protégé: Card Sorting and Laddering , 2006, ASWC.

[16]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Do ducks lay eggs? How people interpret generic assertions , 2007 .

[17]  Thomas Andreas Meyer,et al.  Sydney OWL Syntax - towards a Controlled Natural Language Syntax for OWL 1.1 , 2007, OWLED.

[18]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  Comparison and the development of knowledge , 2007, Cognition.

[19]  Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.  Verbalizing OWL in Attempto Controlled English , 2007, OWLED.

[20]  Catherine Dolbear,et al.  Lege Feliciter: Using Structured English to represent a Topographic Hydrology Ontology , 2007, OWLED.