BRCA1 controls the cell division axis and governs ploidy and phenotype in human mammary cells

BRCA1 deficiency may perturb the differentiation hierarchy present in the normal mammary gland and is associated with the genesis of breast cancers that are genomically unstable and typically display a basal-like transcriptome. Oriented cell division is a mechanism known to regulate cell fates and to restrict tumor formation. We now show that the cell division axis is altered following shRNA-mediated BRCA1 depletion in immortalized but non-tumorigenic, or freshly isolated normal human mammary cells with graded consequences in progeny cells that include aneuploidy, perturbation of cell polarity in spheroid cultures, and a selective loss of cells with luminal features. BRCA1 depletion stabilizes HMMR abundance and disrupts cortical asymmetry of NUMA-dynein complexes in dividing cells such that polarity cues provided by cell-matrix adhesions were not able to orient division. We also show that immortalized mammary cells carrying a mutant BRCA1 allele (BRCA1 185delAG/+) reproduce many of these effects but in this model, oriented divisions were maintained through cues provided by CDH1+ cell-cell junctions. These findings reveal a previously unknown effect of BRCA1 suppression on mechanisms that regulate the cell division axis in proliferating, non-transformed human mammary epithelial cells and consequent downstream effects on the mitotic integrity and phenotype control of their progeny.

[1]  L. Salmena,et al.  Plasma osteoprotegerin and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers , 2016, Oncotarget.

[2]  P. Mullan,et al.  The identification of a novel role for BRCA1 in regulating RNA polymerase I transcription , 2016, Oncotarget.

[3]  Pang-Kuo Lo,et al.  Dysregulation of the BRCA1/long non-coding RNA NEAT1 signaling axis contributes to breast tumorigenesis , 2016, Oncotarget.

[4]  A. Giobbie-Hurder,et al.  BRCA1/FANCD2/BRG1-Driven DNA Repair Stabilizes the Differentiation State of Human Mammary Epithelial Cells. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[5]  R. Medema,et al.  Chromosome misalignments induce spindle‐positioning defects , 2016, EMBO reports.

[6]  David K. Lubensky,et al.  Epithelial tricellular junctions act as interphase cell shape sensors to orient mitosis , 2016, Nature.

[7]  G. Terzoudi,et al.  Low concentrations of caffeine induce asymmetric cell division as observed in vitro by means of the CBMN-assay and iFISH. , 2015, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[8]  K. Iwata,et al.  Aneuploidy generates proteotoxic stress and DNA damage concurrently with p53-mediated post-mitotic apoptosis in SAC-impaired cells , 2015, Nature Communications.

[9]  D. Pellman,et al.  Causes and consequences of centrosome abnormalities in cancer , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  C. Maxwell,et al.  Spatial regulation of Aurora A activity during mitotic spindle assembly requires RHAMM to correctly localize TPX2 , 2014, Cell cycle.

[11]  C. Eaves,et al.  Glutathione-dependent and -independent oxidative stress-control mechanisms distinguish normal human mammary epithelial cell subsets , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Humbert,et al.  Huntingtin Regulates Mammary Stem Cell Division and Differentiation , 2014, Stem cell reports.

[13]  E. Fuchs,et al.  Spindle orientation and epidermal morphogenesis , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  D. White,et al.  Aurora A kinase regulates mammary epithelial cell fate by determining mitotic spindle orientation in a Notch-dependent manner. , 2013, Cell reports.

[15]  Hongmin Wang,et al.  BRCA1 downregulates the kinase activity of Polo-like kinase 1 in response to replication stress , 2013, Cell cycle.

[16]  M. Textor,et al.  Effect of Cell Shape and Dimensionality on Spindle Orientation and Mitotic Timing , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  C. Eaves,et al.  The Luminal Progenitor Compartment of the Normal Human Mammary Gland Constitutes a Unique Site of Telomere Dysfunction , 2013, Stem cell reports.

[18]  J. Keats,et al.  Genomic imbalance of HMMR/RHAMM regulates the sensitivity and response of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour cells to aurora kinase inhibition , 2013, Oncotarget.

[19]  L. Schermelleh,et al.  Dynein light chain 1 and a spindle-associated adaptor promote dynein asymmetry and spindle orientation , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Epithelial and Mesenchymal Subpopulations Within Normal Basal Breast Cell Lines Exhibit Distinct Stem Cell/Progenitor Properties , 2012, Stem cells.

[21]  I. Cheeseman,et al.  Chromosome and spindle pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  Marc Vidal,et al.  Interplay between BRCA1 and RHAMM Regulates Epithelial Apicobasal Polarization and May Influence Risk of Breast Cancer , 2011, PLoS biology.

[23]  Hiroyuki Konishi,et al.  Mutation of a single allele of the cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 leads to genomic instability in human breast epithelial cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Taryn E. Gillies,et al.  Cell Division Orientation in Animals , 2011, Current Biology.

[25]  Michel Bornens,et al.  External forces control mitotic spindle positioning , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  Nicolas Minc,et al.  Influence of Cell Geometry on Division-Plane Positioning , 2011, Cell.

[27]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic predisposition directs breast cancer phenotype by dictating progenitor cell fate. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[28]  A. Ashworth,et al.  BRCA1 basal-like breast cancers originate from luminal epithelial progenitors and not from basal stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[29]  S. Fox,et al.  Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[30]  H. Moch,et al.  VHL loss causes spindle misorientation and chromosome instability , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  Debra L Winkeljohn.  Triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[32]  G. Turashvili,et al.  A method for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[33]  K. Gunsalus,et al.  Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. , 2007, Nature genetics.

[34]  David M. Livingston,et al.  The BRCA1/BARD1 Heterodimer Modulates Ran-Dependent Mitotic Spindle Assembly , 2006, Cell.

[35]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  BRCA1-Dependent Ubiquitination of γ-Tubulin Regulates Centrosome Number , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[37]  I. Macara,et al.  A mammalian Partner of inscuteable binds NuMA and regulates mitotic spindle organization , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  X. Wang,et al.  Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[39]  R. White,et al.  BRCA1 is associated with the centrosome during mitosis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J.,et al.  The New England Journal of Medicine , 2012 .

[41]  Joshua E. Elias,et al.  BRCA1-dependent ubiquitination of gamma-tubulin regulates centrosome number. , 2004, Molecular and cellular biology.