Peer Group Affiliation of Children: The Role of Perceived Popularity, Likeability, and Behavioral Similarity in Bullying

To understand children's peer group affiliation, this study examined to what extent children in naturally occurring groups resemble each other on bullying, likeability, and perceived popularity. Participants were fourth‐ to sixth‐grade pupils (N = 461). Peer groups were identified using the social cognitive map procedure. Resemblance on bullying, likeability, and perceived popularity was evaluated by means of variance components models. Resemblance in peer groups was strongest for perceived popularity, followed by bullying and likeability. Moreover, resemblance on bullying could for a large part be attributed to the high‐perceived popularity of the group, and to a lesser extent, to the low likeability of the group. It is concluded that children showing bullying seem to affiliate with each other most of all to attain or maintain their position in a perceived popular peer group. Results stress the importance of considering the functionality of bullying from a group perspective.

[1]  R. Fabes,et al.  Exposure to Externalizing Peers in Early Childhood: Homophily and Peer Contagion Processes , 2005, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[2]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school , 2002 .

[3]  J. Hektner,et al.  Patterns and Temporal Changes in Peer Affiliation Among Aggressive and Nonaggressive Children Participating in a Summer School Program , 2000, Journal of clinical child psychology.

[4]  F. Goossens,et al.  Bullying and the Need to Belong: Early Adolescents' Bullying‐Related Behavior and the Acceptance they Desire and Receive from Particular Classmates , 2007 .

[5]  T. Farmer,et al.  Bullies and victims in rural African American youth: behavioral characteristics and social network placement. , 2007, Aggressive behavior.

[6]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: a multiinformant approach. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  J. Axelrod,et al.  Children's Social Constructions of Popularity , 2002 .

[8]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[9]  Donna Eder,et al.  CHILDREN'S PEER CULTURES , 1990 .

[10]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Identifying Children's Peer Social Networks in School Classrooms: Links Between Peer Reports and Observed Interactions , 2003 .

[11]  Marion K. Underwood,et al.  Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? , 2001 .

[12]  T. Farmer,et al.  Deviant or Diverse Peer Groups? The Peer Affiliations of Aggressive Elementary Students. , 2002 .

[13]  T. Dishion,et al.  Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. , 1995, Child development.

[14]  D. Olweus.  Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. , 1994, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[15]  T. Farmer,et al.  Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[16]  G. Maassen,et al.  Two-Dimensional Sociometric Status Determination with Rating Scales , 1996 .

[17]  J. Kupersmidt,et al.  Similarity as the Basis for Children's Friendships: The Roles of Sociometric Status, Aggressive and Withdrawn Behavior, Academic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics , 1995 .

[18]  D. Pepler,et al.  Observations of Bullying in the Classroom , 1998 .

[19]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? , 1988 .

[20]  S. Graham,et al.  Chapter 10 – Research-Based Interventions on Bullying , 2004 .

[21]  Amanda J. Rose,et al.  Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[22]  C. Bagwell,et al.  Peer Clique Participation and Social Status in Preadolescence. , 2000 .

[23]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. , 1995, Child development.

[24]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. , 1999 .

[25]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[26]  Thomas A. Kindermann,et al.  Natural Peer Groups as Contexts for Individual Development: The Case of Children's Motivation in School. , 1993 .

[27]  T. Farmer,et al.  Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural african american early adolescents. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[28]  W. Hartup,et al.  Similarities between Friends and Nonfriends in Middle Childhood , 1998 .

[29]  Pete Smith,et al.  Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? , 1999 .

[30]  P. Hawley.  Prosocial and Coercive Configurations of Resource Control in Early Adolescence: A Case for the Well-Adapted Machiavellian , 2003 .

[31]  D. Arnold,et al.  Relational Aggression, Relational Victimization, and Language Development in Preschoolers , 2003 .

[32]  T. Dishion,et al.  Peer Adaptations in the Development of Antisocial Behavior , 1994 .

[33]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. , 2004, Child development.

[34]  Patricia H. Hawley,et al.  The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance: A Strategy-Based Evolutionary Perspective , 1999 .

[35]  D. Espelage,et al.  Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. , 2003, Child development.

[36]  Kyongboon Kwon,et al.  Clique Membership and Social Adjustment in Children's Same-Gender Cliques: The Contribution of the Type of Clique to Children's Self-Reported Adjustment , 2007 .

[37]  K. Dodge,et al.  Group social context and children's aggressive behavior. , 1994, Child development.

[38]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Peer networks and bullying in schools , 1997 .

[39]  E. V. Hodges,et al.  Bullies and Victims in the Peer Ecology: Four Questions for Psychologists and School Professionals , 2003 .

[40]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[41]  R. Cairns,et al.  Aggressive Behaviors in Social Interaction and Developmental Adaptation: A Narrative Analysis of Interpersonal Conflicts During Early Adolescence , 2002 .

[42]  S. Perren,et al.  Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully-victims, and bullies in kindergarten. , 2006, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[43]  D. J. Young,et al.  Test for equality of intraclass correlation coefficients under unequal family sizes. , 1998, Biometrics.

[44]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Is Indirect Aggression Typical of Females? Gender Differences in Aggressiveness in 11- to 12-Year-Old Children , 1988 .

[45]  F. Goossens,et al.  New Participant Role Scales: comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity , 2006 .