Pregnancy Does Not Adversely Affect Postoperative Pain and Function in Women With Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Age at time of THA, mean (SD), y 35 (7.9) 40.7 (4.3) 37.3 (4.3) <0.001 Time fromTHA to survey response,mean (SD),mo 36.5 (27.3) 34.9 (11.7) 39.5 (15.6) 0.24 Preoperative bodymass index, mean (SD), kg/m 25.6 (5.9) 25.4 (4.9) 23.6 (2.0) Race, n (%) 0.35 White 63 (81) 69 (85) 9 (90) Hispanic 12 (16) 6 (8) 1 (10) 0.29 Education level, n (%) 0.83 High school 4 (6) 4 (6) 2 (20) College graduate/advanced degree 50 (63) 53 (65) 5 (50) Reason for THA surgery, n (%) 0.17 Inflammatory arthritis 24 (30) 12 (15) 4 (40) Osteoarthritis 18 (23) 24 (30) 3 (30) Fracture 4 (5) 4 (5) 1 (10) Congenital hip dysplasia 21 (27) 25 (31) 2 (20) Osteonecrosis 10 (13) 16 (20) 0 Other 2 (2) 0 0 Primary THA, n (%) 67 (85) 77 (96) 10 (100) 0.31 Deyo comorbidity 0.69 0 61 (78) 66 (84) 5 (83) >1 17 (22) 13 (16) 1 (17) WOMAC pain Pre-THA, mean (SD) 50.5 (20.2) 50.4 (18.0) 60.0 (15.8) 0.61 Post-THA, mean (SD) 85.2 (18.8) 84.9 (15.8) 92.5 (5.9) 0.4 WOMAC function Pre-THA, mean (SD) 48.9 (20.3) 51.7 (18.3) 54.7 (15.8) 0.63 Post-THA, mean (SD) 87.6 (22.1) 91.1 (15.3) 93.5 (6.4) 0.39 Expectation score, mean (SD) 81.1 (14.7) 86.5 (12.9) 86.8 (12.8) 0.13 Overall THA satisfaction 0.62 Very satisfied, n (%) 40 (87) 70 (86) 9 (90) Very dissatisfied, n (%) 0 1 (1) 0 Improvement in quality of life post-THA 0.68 Great improvement, n (%) 42 (53.1) 42 (51.2) 6 (60) C hanging indications and utilization patterns have resulted in shifting demographics of patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) to include younger patients, including women of childbearing potential. There have been concerns that pregnancy following THA could result in prosthetic loosening, dislocation, pain, or functional impairment. While several case series report successful pregnancies following THA, less is known about the effects of pregnancy on pain or function associated with the maternal hip prosthesis. Using a well-characterized cohort from a THA registry at a single highvolume specialty hospital, we compared preoperative and postoperative measures of pain and function in 3 groups of women: those with only pre-THA pregnancies, those with pregnancy post-THA, and those without any pregnancy. Our primary objective was to compare postoperative pain and function in women with different pregnancy histories. Women aged 18 to 45 years enrolled in an institutional THA registry from 2007 to 2011 were identified. Subjects had preoperative pain and function data collected as part of the registry. For this study, subjects received a questionnaire eliciting pregnancy history (defined as gestation lasting >30 weeks) with additional questions about postarthroplasty pain and function. The primary outcomes of interest were postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster UniversitiesOsteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function scores (0–100, with higher scores indicating better function and less pain). Secondary objectives included pregnancy outcomes, comparing those who had pre-THA pregnancy to those who had postTHA pregnancy. Of 325 eligible women undergoing THA in the study period, 171 women (52.6%) responded to the pregnancyfocused questionnaire. Comparing responders to nonresponders, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of demographics or preoperative baselineWOMAC pain and function scores. Of the responders, 79 women (46.2%) reported being nulliparous, 82

[1]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Has Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 30 Years or Younger Improved? A Systematic Review , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Danica Marinac-Dabic,et al.  Sex and risk of hip implant failure: assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  Robin L Bliss,et al.  Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[4]  H. Huhtala,et al.  Increasing incidence of hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in 30- to 59-year-old patients , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[5]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030 , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  F. Traina,et al.  Safety of pregnancy and delivery after total hip arthroplasty. , 2007, Journal of women's health.

[7]  J. Pijnenborg,et al.  Pregnancy and childbirth after total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  W. Capello,et al.  Clinical outcome and incidence of pregnancy after bipolar and total hip arthroplasty in young women. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Pregnancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  N. Bellamy Instruments to assess osteoarthritis--current status and future needs. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  E. Salvati,et al.  Pregnancy outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study and review of the literature. , 2003, Orthopedics.