The effect of background color on asymmetries in color search.

Many previous studies have shown that background color affects the discriminability and appearance of color stimuli. However, research on visual search has not typically considered the role that the background may play. Rosenholtz (2001a) has suggested that color search asymmetries result from the relationship between the stimuli and the background. Here we test the hypothesis that background color should have an effect on asymmetries in visual search based on color, using searches for color stimuli on different colored backgrounds. Observers searched for a single known target stimulus among homogeneous distractor stimuli. The target stimulus differed from the distractors only in chromaticity, but targets and distractors both differed from the backgrounds in luminance so that they were easily visible regardless of chromaticity. Target/distractor pairs differed primarily in saturation (Experiments 1, 2, & 3) or in hue (Experiment 4). Each member of each pair of colors served as target and distractor color on both achromatic and red backgrounds. When the stimuli were presented on an achromatic background, response times were shorter when the more saturated member of each pair of colors served as the target color. When the same stimuli were presented on a red background, the asymmetry was either reversed or abolished. When target and distractors differed in hue, there was little asymmetry on the achromatic background but a sizable asymmetry for some color pairs on the red background. On both backgrounds, the magnitude of the asymmetry varied with the difference between the stimulus colors and the background color. Results confirm that asymmetries in color search are dependent on the relationship between the stimulus colors and the background color. Two candidate models are suggested that show promise in predicting these experimental results: Rosenholtz' saliency model (1999, 2001a) and a modification to signal detection theory models in which the observation noise is proportional to the difference between target/distractor color and background color.

[1]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[3]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  R. M. Boynton.  A system of photometry and colorimetry based on cone excitations , 1986 .

[6]  P. Lennie,et al.  Mechanisms of color vision. , 1988, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[7]  J. Krauskopf,et al.  Color discrimination and adaptation , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Pokorny,et al.  How surrounds affect chromaticity discrimination. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Webster,et al.  The influence of contrast adaptation on color appearance , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  M. D'Zmura,et al.  Contrast gain control: a bilinear model for chromatic selectivity. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  A. Nagy,et al.  Asymmetries in Simple Feature Searches for Color , 1996, Vision Research.

[14]  K. Mullen,et al.  Postreceptoral chromatic detection mechanisms revealed by noise masking in three-dimensional cone contrast space. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  A L Nagy,et al.  Interactions between achromatic and chromatic mechanisms in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  R. Rosenholtz.  A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  A L Nagy,et al.  The achromatic mechanism and mechanisms tuned to chromaticity and luminance in visual search. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  Steven K Shevell,et al.  A central mechanism of chromatic contrast , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  S. Shevell,et al.  Role of perceptual organization in chromatic induction. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  R. Rosenholtz.  Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Wolfe.  Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  R. Rosenholtz.  Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  A. Oliva,et al.  Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks , 2002, Vision Research.

[26]  Qasim Zaidi,et al.  Adaptive orthogonalization of opponent-color signals , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.