Decision under Multiple Estimates for the Importance Coefficients of Criteria and Probabilities of Values of Uncertain Factors in the Aim Function

Papers on the construction of preference relations by an additive aim function having multiple inexact (interval) estimates for its coefficients are briefly reviewed. Conditions for the nondominance and potential optimality of variants are stated. New results on the relations between two basic definitions of preference relations and qualitative criteria are given.

[1]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  Decision Analysis with Incomplete Utility and Probability Information , 1993, Oper. Res..

[2]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Decision making under partial probability information using pair-wise comparisons , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  C. Kirkwood,et al.  The Effectiveness of Partial Information about Attribute Weights for Ranking Alternatives in Multiattribute Decision Making , 1993 .

[4]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application , 1985, Oper. Res..

[5]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information , 1997 .

[6]  F. Fernández,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients , 1995 .

[7]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory , 1986, Oper. Res..

[9]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  An elementary proof of Paelinck's theorem on the convex hull of ranked criterion weights , 1991 .

[10]  Simon French,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN DISCRETE MULTI OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING , 1991 .

[11]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Decision theory and strict ranking of probabilities , 1982 .

[12]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Obtaining Nondominated Priority Vectors for Multiple Objective Decisionmaking Problems with Different Combinations of Cardinal and Ordinal Information , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Conflict resolution : the analytic hierarchy approach , 1989 .

[14]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Decision And Value Theory , 1965 .

[15]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Evaluating Suppliers of Complex Systems: A Multiple Criteria Approach , 1992 .

[16]  A. M. Mármol,et al.  Decision criteria with partial information , 2000 .

[17]  Martin Weber.  Decision Making with Incomplete Information , 1987 .

[18]  M. P. Biswal,et al.  Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments , 1997 .

[19]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information , 1997 .

[20]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  A penalty function approach to alternative pairwise comparisons in ISMAUT , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  P. Fishburn.  Analysis of Decisions with Incomplete Knowledge of Probabilities , 1965 .

[22]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Decision making under partial probability information , 1994 .

[23]  W. Cook,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data , 1991 .

[24]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.