An attempt to close the Gap: Recommending Learning Activities in PLEs

The term personal learning environment (PLE) is very broad and entails high demands. Compared to known learning management environments (LMEs) PLEs seem as of yet not to have been implemented. Especially from the pedagogical point of view, PLEs hardly seem to make up for the individual learning promise. One solution to close the gap is to concentrate on elementary aspects of PLEs. Recommendations seem to help a lost user in need to find appropriate learning materials as well as tools. But simple recommendations cannot make up for the decisions in a complex learning process. Identifying coherent streams of micro-activities on a log-file level that match concepts of psychological models on a more abstracted level is a fruitful as well as difficult task. Two ways to find such a path are sketched in this paper.

[1]  H. Gerard,et al.  Attributed intentions and informational selectivity , 1974 .

[2]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Personal Learning Environment - a Conceptual Study , 2010, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[3]  Erik Duval,et al.  Tracking Actual Usage: the Attention Metadata Approach , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  Katja Niemann,et al.  Contextualized attention metadata , 2011 .

[5]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  A Framework for the Domain-Independent Collection of Attention Metadata , 2010, EC-TEL.

[6]  Arnon Hershkovitz,et al.  A Case Study of Using Visualization for Understanding the Behavior of the Online Learner , 2007 .

[7]  Austen Clark,et al.  Perception, Philosophical Issues about , 2006 .

[8]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  Self-monitoring for Computer Users , 2009, GI Jahrestagung.

[9]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  Analysing Contextualized Attention Metadata for Self-regulated Learning - A Supporting Framework for Self-Monitoring and Self-Reflection , 2010, CSEDU.

[10]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  CAMera for PLE , 2009, EC-TEL.

[11]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  Analyzing Contextualized Attention Metadata with Rough Set Methodologies to Support Self-regulated Learning , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[12]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  B. Malle,et al.  The Folk Concept of Intentionality , 1997 .

[14]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Discerning intentions in dynamic human action , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[17]  Nick Cramer,et al.  Automatic Keyword Extraction from Individual Documents , 2010 .

[18]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Fourteen-through 18-month-old infants di eren-tially imitate intentional and accidental actions , 1998 .

[19]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  Erik Duval,et al.  Attention metadata: collection and management , 2006 .

[21]  Leon Urbas,et al.  Multitasking-Strategien in der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion , 2006, MMI Interakt..

[22]  M. van Harmelen Personal Learning Environments , 2006 .