Performance of masonry enclosure walls: lessons learned from recent earthquakes

This paper discusses the issue of performance requirements and construction criteria for masonry enclosure and infill walls. Vertical building enclosures in European countries are very often constituted by non-load-bearing masonry walls, using horizontally perforated clay bricks. These walls are generally supported and confined by a reinforced concrete frame structure of columns and beams/slabs. Since these walls are commonly considered to be nonstructural elements and their influence on the structural response is ignored, their consideration in the design of structures as well as their connection to the adjacent structural elements is frequently negligent or insufficiently detailed. As a consequence, nonstructural elements, as for wall enclosures, are relatively sensitive to drift and acceleration demands when buildings are subjected to seismic actions. Many international standards and technical documents stress the need for design acceptability criteria for nonstructural elements, however they do not specifically indicate how to prevent collapse and severe cracking, and how to enhance the overall stability in the case of moderate to high seismic loading. Furthermore, a review of appropriate measures to improve enclosure wall performance and both in-plane and out-of-plane integrity under seismic actions is addressed.

[1]  D. K. Bell,et al.  Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels , 2001 .

[2]  Sigmund A. Freeman Racking Tests of High-Rise Building Partitions , 1977 .

[3]  Adem Doǧangün,et al.  Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey , 2004 .

[4]  Amorim Varum Humberto Seismic Assessment, Strengthening and Repair of Existing Buildings , 2003 .

[5]  J. A. R. Mendes da Silva,et al.  Defects of non-loadbearing masonry walls due to partial basal supports , 2007 .

[6]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Evaluation of Strengthening Techniques of Traditional Masonry Buildings: Case Study of a Four-Building Aggregate , 2011 .

[7]  Arnold W. Hendry,et al.  Design of Masonry Structures , 2003 .

[8]  D. Sc,et al.  DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUCTURES Third edition of Load Bearing Brickwork Design , 2004 .

[9]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey , 2003 .

[10]  Qu Zhe,et al.  Analysis on Building Seismic Damage in the Wenchuan Earthquake , 2008 .

[11]  Athol,et al.  ANALYTICAL MODELLING OF INFILLED FRAME STRUCTURES-A GENERAL REVIEW Francisco , 2009 .

[12]  Tiziana Rossetto,et al.  The L’Aquila (Italy) Earthquake of 6th April 2009: A Preliminary Report by EEFIT , 2009 .

[13]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  Analytical modelling of infilled frame structures , 2000 .

[14]  Arnold W. Hendry,et al.  Load Bearing Brickwork Design , 1987 .

[15]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Seismic response of gravity-load designed frame systems with masonry infills , 2004 .

[16]  Dina D'Ayala,et al.  Definition of Collapse Mechanisms and Seismic Vulnerability of Historic Masonry Buildings , 2003 .

[17]  Aníbal Costa,et al.  Simplified Macro-Model for Infill Masonry Panels , 2010 .