A model of consumer information search and online network externalities

This article looks at a consumer who faces a choice between two sources of information: conventional and online. The online source is different from the conventional one because consumers care about how many people are using it along with them. Generally, the more users the better (positive network externality), but, on the other hand, the presence of more users implies a reduction of available capacity, about which consumers also care. We assume that consumers maximize their utility, which is modeled as a function of all other consumption, knowledge, and network externalities. Knowledge is conceptualized as a function of the amount of information spent both on the online network and on conventional sources. Since consumer information searches may differ according to demographic differences, this may result in consumers’ differences in their usage of online networks and conventional sources. We include these externalities in our model to better understand consumer choice behavior for the online network. The consumer utility function is estimated by using the model estimation method developed in this article, since the interactions implied by the consumer utility function are more complex than one could hope to estimate econometrically. We use survey data to regress the demand for online information depending on income, education, the number of users, and remaining capacity. We introduce a methodology to simulate how consumers’ representative utilities will behave in different network environments and derive implications for online network suppliers.

[1]  B. Ratchford,et al.  Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis , 1997 .

[2]  N. Economides The economics of networks , 1996 .

[3]  J. Westland Congestion and network externalities in the short run pricing of information system services , 1992 .

[4]  Julio J. Rotemberg,et al.  Overt Interfunctional Conflict (and Its Reduction through Business Strategy) , 1995 .

[5]  G. Urban,et al.  You have printed the following article : Modeling Multiattribute Utility , Risk , and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice , 2007 .

[6]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[7]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[8]  C. Antonelli The Economics of Information Networks , 1992 .

[9]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[10]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Special issue on network economics: Business conduct and market structure , 1996 .

[11]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[12]  N. Economides,et al.  COMPETITION AND INTEGRATION AMONG COMPLEMENTS, AND NETWORK MARKET STRUCTURE* , 1992 .

[13]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[14]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[15]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Product Introduction with Network Externalities , 1992 .

[16]  Garth Saloner,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Adoption of Technologies Uith Network Effects: an Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines , 2022 .

[17]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach , 1990 .

[18]  G. Becker A Treatise on the Family , 1982 .