Compressive sampling based approach for identification of moving loads distribution on cable-stayed bridges

A moving loads distribution identification method for cable-stayed bridges based on compressive sampling (CS) technique is proposed. CS is a technique for obtaining sparse signal representations to underdetermined linear measurement equations. In this paper, CS is employed to localize moving loads of cable-stayed bridges by limit cable force measurements. First, a vehicle-bridge model for cable-stayed bridges is presented. Then the relationship between the cable force and moving loads is constructed based on the influence lines. With the hypothesis of sparsity distribution of vehicles on bridge deck (which is practical for long-span bridges), the moving loads are identified by minimizing the ‘l2-norm of the difference between the observed and simulated cable forces caused by moving vehicles penalized by the ‘l1-norm’ of the moving load vector. The resultant minimization problem is convex and can be solved efficiently. A numerical example of a real cable-stayed bridge is carried out to verify the proposed method. The robustness and accuracy of the identification approach with limit cable force measurement for multi-vehicle spatial localization are validated.

[1]  Lu Deng,et al.  Identification of parameters of vehicles moving on bridges , 2009 .

[2]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  X. Zhu,et al.  Vehicle Condition Surveillance on Continuous Bridges Based on Response Sensitivity , 2006 .

[4]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Compressed Sensing with Coherent and Redundant Dictionaries , 2010, ArXiv.

[5]  Y. K. Cheung,et al.  Identification of vehicles moving on continuous bridges with rough surface , 2004 .

[6]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Moving force identification: A time domain method , 1997 .

[7]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Recent research on identification of moving loads on bridges , 2007 .

[8]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[9]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[11]  Richard G Baraniuk,et al.  More Is Less: Signal Processing and the Data Deluge , 2011, Science.

[12]  James L Beck,et al.  Compressive sampling for accelerometer signals in structural health monitoring , 2011 .

[13]  Alan J. Miller Subset Selection in Regression , 1992 .

[14]  S. S. Law,et al.  Innovative Bridge Condition Assessment from Dynamic Response of a Passing Vehicle , 2006 .

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Y. K. Cheung,et al.  Parameter identification of vehicles moving on continuous bridges , 2004 .

[17]  P. Shearer,et al.  Compressive sensing of the Tohoku‐Oki Mw 9.0 earthquake: Frequency‐dependent rupture modes , 2011 .