Contribution of global and local biological motion information to speed perception and discrimination.

To respond to movements of others and understand the intention of others' actions, it is important to accurately extract motion information from body movements. Here, using original and spatially scrambled point-light biological motions in upright and inverted orientations, we investigated the effect of global and local biological motion information on speed perception and sensitivity. The speed discrimination task revealed that speed sensitivity was higher for the original than for scrambled stimuli (Experiment 1) and higher for upright than for inverted stimuli (Experiment 2). Perceived motion speed was slower for the original than for scrambled stimuli (Experiment 2), but regardless of the orientation of the display (Experiment 1). A subsequent experiment comparing different scrambled stimuli of the same actions showed that the higher speed discrimination sensitivity to upright stimuli was preserved even in the scrambled biological motions (Experiment 3). Taken together, our findings suggest that perception of the speed of biological movements emanates from both global and local biological motion signals.

[1]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Translation and articulation in biological motion perception. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[2]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perceiving the Direction of Articulatory Motion in Point-Light Actions , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Gideon Paul Caplovitz,et al.  The global slowdown effect: Why does perceptual grouping reduce perceived speed? , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Sheng He,et al.  Searching for Life Motion Signals , 2010, Psychological science.

[7]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Characterizing global and local mechanisms in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[8]  P. Tse,et al.  The whole moves less than the spin of its parts , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror neuron system. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[10]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  Eric Hiris,et al.  Detection of biological and nonbiological motion. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[13]  A. Atkinson,et al.  Evidence for distinct contributions of form and motion information to the recognition of emotions from body gestures , 2007, Cognition.

[14]  M. Giese,et al.  Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[15]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[16]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[17]  N. Troje,et al.  Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Antonino Casile,et al.  Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[19]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[21]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[22]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[24]  Vic Braden,et al.  Recognising the Style of Spatially Exaggerated Tennis Serves , 2001, Perception.

[25]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Morphable Models for the Analysis and Synthesis of Complex Motion Patterns , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[28]  F. Pollick,et al.  Exaggerating Temporal Differences Enhances Recognition of Individuals from Point Light Displays , 2000, Psychological science.

[29]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[30]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[31]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[32]  S. Lea,et al.  Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance , 1996, Perception.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[36]  W. Dittrich.  Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[37]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.

[38]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  S. Ullman.  The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[40]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[42]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[43]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[44]  N. F. Troje,et al.  2.13 – Biological Motion Perception , 2008 .

[45]  Tido Röder,et al.  Documentation Mocap Database HDM05 , 2007 .

[46]  N. Troje.  A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns , 2002 .

[47]  J. Pinto,et al.  Subcon ® gurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays , 1999 .

[48]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[49]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[50]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Biological Motion Perception: an fMRI Study , 2022 .